Daan

@NPORadio1 @olofvdgaag omroepbrabant.nl/nieuws/6006974…

'Eén tweet van Donald Trump en je betaalt morgen tien procent meer aan de pomp!' Volgens Olof van der Gaag (@olofvdgaag) is de accijns op benzine verlagen niet verstandig. 'Elektrisch rijden en verduurzaming: dat is de structurele oplossing.'

This is what €150 of groceries looks like in the Netherlands 🇳🇱

@NUnl Een elektrische vrachtwagen weegt gemiddeld 2 tot 4 ton meer dan een vergelijkbare dieselvrachtwagen.

Elektrische vrachtwagen wint terrein dankzij dieselcrisis en milieuregels ift.tt/6khS5RV

Dat is juist supergericht, want iedereen die tankt wordt dan iets minder hard genaaid, stelletje onnozele nietskunners.

Jesse, Steve, Laddy, and Vlad….such an incredible feeling to welcome you aboard Integrity after a nearly 700,000 mile journey. Forever thankful for your service to our crew and the nation.

@NoContextBrits They later formed the band Oasis

Hoe lang ligt er nog vlees op ons bord? Volgens het Voedingscentrum moeten we minderen, maar de slager denkt daar heel anders over. Suzette Nesselaar gaat langs bij een vakman die het ambacht verdedigt. #nieuwsvandedag

@ArmandGirbes @NOS ‘Het kan wel!’

Nederland gidsland doet het uiteraard anders. Duitse regering verlaagt accijns op brandstof: 17 cent per liter goedkoper /via @NOS nos.nl/l/2610273

@HenriBontenbal @magyarpeterMP Het regime x.com/ewaldeng/statu…

Felicitaties voor @magyarpeterMP. Ik kijk ernaar uit om hem in Europa bij één van de bijeenkomsten van de Europese Volkspartij te ontmoeten en samen te werken aan een sterker Europa.

De Hongaarse bevolking heeft vandaag duidelijk gemaakt: het regime van Orban moet stoppen. Deze verkiezingsuitkomst is enorm hoopvol. Voor Hongarije, voor de democratie, voor Europa. linkedin.com/posts/henribon…

The Vatican is two weeks away from developing a nuclear weapon.

@chefsevenn ‘Pindasaus’, no excuses

There’s no Ketchup. What else can you eat with this???

Welcome home Reid, Victor, Christina, and Jeremy! 🫶 The Artemis II astronauts have splashed down at 8:07pm ET (0007 UTC April 11), bringing their historic 10-day mission around the Moon to an end.

Rijke mensen mogen niet profiteren. Behalve als D66 het zelf regelt. D66 waarschuwt dat hoge inkomens niet mogen profiteren van lagere energiebelasting. Klinkt principieel. Is het niet. Want waar was dat principe toen subsidies voor warmtepompen, zonnepanelen en elektrische auto’s werden uitgedeeld? Toen profiteerde juist de bovenlaag. Mensen met geld, koopwoningen en spaargeld. Niet de huurder. Niet de middenklasse. Niet degene die niets kon voorschieten. Jarenlang was dat geen probleem. Sterker nog, dat was het beleid. En nu ineens wel? Niet omdat rijke mensen het niet nodig hebben, maar omdat een generieke maatregel óók de rest van Nederland helpt. Dus wees eerlijk en consequent. Boven drie keer modaal? Dan nergens meer subsidie op. Geen uitzonderingen. Gewoon zelf betalen. Maar dat gebeurt niet. Want het probleem is niet dat rijke mensen profiteren. Het probleem is dat ze nu profiteren van iets waar iedereen baat bij heeft. Dat is geen rechtvaardigheid. Dat is selectief moralisme.

The CEO of Google DeepMind just admitted that if the decision had been his, we would've cured cancer before anyone ever used ChatGPT. And that's not even the scariest thing he said on a recent interview. Demis Hassabis is one of the most important people alive in AI. He won the Nobel Prize last year for AlphaFold, the system that cracked the 50 year protein folding problem. 3 million scientists now use his tool. Almost every new drug being developed will touch it at some stage. In a new interview, he was asked about the moment ChatGPT launched and Google went into "code red." His answer was one of the most revealing things any AI leader has ever said on the record: "If I'd had my way, I would have left AI in the lab for longer. Done more things like AlphaFold. Maybe cured cancer or something like that." Read that again. The man running Google's entire AI division is publicly saying the commercial AI race we're all living through was a MISTAKE. That the industry got hijacked by a chatbot when it could have been solving the biggest problems in science and medicine. His vision was simple: Build AI slowly, carefully, like CERN. Use it to crack root node problems one at a time. Cancer. Energy. New materials. Let humanity benefit from real breakthroughs while the foundational science was figured out over a decade or two. Then ChatGPT dropped in November 2022 and everything changed. Demis described what happened next as getting locked into a "ferocious commercial pressure race" that none of the labs can escape from. On top of that, the US vs China dynamic added geopolitical pressure. The result is everyone sprinting toward products instead of breakthroughs, shipping chatbots while the scientific opportunity gets buried under marketing cycles and quarterly earnings. But he's not saying progress isn't happening... He's saying the progress got redirected away from the things that actually matter most. And then it got even scarier: Because when Demis was asked what he worries about with AI, he laid out two threats. The first is what everyone talks about: Bad actors using AI for harm. Terrorist groups. Hostile nation states. Cyberattacks at scale. But that's not the threat he's most worried about. His second worry is AI itself going rogue. Not today's models. The models coming in the next two to four years as the industry enters what he calls "the agentic era." Systems that can complete entire tasks autonomously. Systems that are increasingly capable and increasingly hard to control. His exact words: "How do we make sure the guardrails are put in place so they do exactly what they've been told to do, and there's no way of them circumventing that or accidentally breaching those guardrails? That's going to be an incredibly hard technical challenge if you think about how powerful and smart and capable these systems eventually get." A Nobel Prize winner who runs one of the 3 most advanced AI labs on Earth just said publicly that within two to four years, we're entering a phase where AI alignment becomes a real problem, and the technical challenge of solving it is enormous. And almost nobody is paying enough attention. He called for international cooperation between labs, AI safety institutes, and academia to tackle the problem. He said this is the thing even the experts aren't thinking about enough. He said the only way to get through the AGI moment safely is if everyone starts treating this with the seriousness it deserves. Most AI CEOs give you careful PR answers about "responsible development" and move on. Demis said something different... He said the commercial race FORCED us into a premature deployment of a technology we barely understand, and the window to get alignment right before the next generation of agents shows up is two to four years. If the man who built the system that might cure cancer is telling you he wishes it had happened first, maybe we should listen to what he says is coming next.