Francisco Rivera

@ssuudp @termoazul11 Pero hay efectos lag de la bencina, por ejemplo que mucha gente dejara de usar el auto significa que las micros van mas llenas y la sensación de oferta disminuye. Todo eso se empieza a sentir a lo largo de las semanas, no es un efecto inmediato

@termoazul11 La caida producto de la bencina fue cuando terminó definitivamente su luna de miel y despues por 2 semanas se estabilizó por lo que no me atrevería a asociarlo a eso.

La verdad me sorprende este desfonde sin una polémica relevante e incluso con un respiro tras lo sucedido con la ministra. ¿Teorías?

@Gemini_803 @grok @MtgDentless @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp What technicality? Again, for the 1 million time, the dress was evidence. It was not used in court because Trump didn't submit DNA. Thus, this was not a he vs she case.

@fgrivera2 @grok @MtgDentless @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp Whether it is right or wrong, you understand it and you can only argue on a technicality. Must be tough to admit you were wrong to someone like me then.

The Dems will NEVER get @ConnerHKnapp

@Gemini_803 @grok @MtgDentless @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp I mean, you cannot distinguish when to use "you" and "they". I have no qualms about your perception of others, to be honest.

@fgrivera2 @grok @MtgDentless @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp Thanks for the lesson, but it seems like you are the only one who can’t admit when they are wrong here.

@Gemini_803 @grok @MtgDentless @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp You want to feel good about the dress not being used as evidence on a technicality about how useful it would have been on court. Great, that it's the level you have to resort to, feel good. What a stupid point.

@Gemini_803 @grok @MtgDentless @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp Dude, you're seriously dumb and at this point i just don't know if you're just a troll. Seriously. You said the case was a he vs she, it was not, Trump could have exonerated himself if he submitted his DNA.

@Gemini_803 @grok @MtgDentless @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp The fact you have 2 links explaining this (the court and the guardian article) and still do the "well, not submitted lalalala" it's just dumb.

@Gemini_803 @grok @MtgDentless @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp No, because the court tried to get Trump's DNA to use the dress as evidence. The reason the dress was not submitted was that Trump never gave his DNA. The dress was excluded because the judge ruled it was useless without the DNA, no because of a denial to submit

@Gemini_803 @grok @MtgDentless @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp Again, just say "i didn't knew, i was wrong" it cannot be this hard.

@Gemini_803 @grok @MtgDentless @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp For god sake you cannot be "lIbel". You're just stupid, it's astounding. The dress was not submitted because Trump didn't give his DNA, idiot. IT'S ON THE LINK. He also said she "was not his type" and proceeded to confuse her photo with one of her ex-wives in court.

@Gemini_803 @grok @MtgDentless @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp hahahaha i saw you trying to make Grok say you can be found "libel". For god sake dude, just give up, at this point is just sad. Btw, everything Grok said is literally in the guardian link i posted

@grok @fgrivera2 @MtgDentless @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp @grok you claimed that I spelled libel wrong then spelled the word the same way as libel. Would you care to restate if Trump was found libel in that case?

@Gemini_803 @MtgDentless @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp also, using "civil" in quotations like it's not some real category is just as dumb as saying he was found "libel". It's obvious you didn't knew about this before i posted the link (and it was not a corrector) because you even give me a like for the post. Just say "i was wrong".

@Gemini_803 @MtgDentless @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp He was not found libel, you cannot be found "libel". You're just astronomically stupid. And you're wrong about the physical evidence too. I have mentioned several times Trump could exonarated Himself by simply giving DNA theguardian.com/us-news/2023/f…

@Gemini_803 @MtgDentless @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp libel is defamation, you idiot. And being liable for a sexual assault is literally finding you liable for a sex crime. The reason the case didn't go to a criminal court is because of the statute of limitations, not because the case was weak or a he vs she.

@fgrivera2 @MtgDentless @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp Go fuck yourself

@Gemini_803 @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp I understand what you're saying, you moved the goalpost from "show me how he is adjudicated, no libel" to "no, the civil case doesn't work". It's fine to accept you were wrong.

@fgrivera2 @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp Holy shit, you don’t even understand what I’m saying. I just realized you are an account from Chile…not waisting my time on you trying to go back and explain where you misunderstood what I was saying…

@Gemini_803 @MtgDentless @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp Anyway, you're lying about the evidence too. She submitted the dress and it was certified that it had Male DNA in it. Trump didn't wanted to submit his DNA to prove it was not his, something that could have exonerated him.

@Gemini_803 @MtgDentless @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp No, you said "found that he was adjudicated, no libel". It's like 3-4 posts above this. You don't need to lie this hard.

@Gemini_803 @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp They had the dress with DNA and Trump could have exonerated himself by giving his DNA. Maybe if you read the document and proof, you actually wanted someone to show, you would say actual intelligent stuff. But no, it's easier to just say "you're retarded" and move on.

@Gemini_803 @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp How is he not liable? This is literally the first sentence in the document i linked: "In this case, after a nine-day trial, a jury found that plaintiff-appellee E. Jean Carroll was sexually abused by defendant-appellant Donald J. Trump"

@Gemini_803 @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp Or maybe if you read the sentence, you would see there is actually evidence and not a him vs she stuff. There is a reason a jury found him guilty Not that it matters because you wanted a ruling and there is one. So this is just moving the goal post.

@fgrivera2 @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp So the one where he was found liable for sexual abuse. In which no hard evidence was produced and was basically her word vs his.

@Gemini_803 @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp Also, the judge literally said his crime amount to rape but they could not put that as the official ruling because technically, using the fingers is not legally rape.

@Gemini_803 @go2hellcarolina @MacrodosingPod @ConnerHKnapp So, you really didn't knew eh? law.justia.com/cases/federal/…