NINE OR NONE

18.8K posts

NINE OR NONE

NINE OR NONE

@jongdaecreaming

参加日 Temmuz 2023
257 フォロー中34 フォロワー
NINE OR NONE
NINE OR NONE@jongdaecreaming·
@oshshgrl @701bluejays Gurl, point gue itu solo stan/akgae yang tiba tiba perduli group (padahal dari dulu ngehujat) cuman buat jadiin member yang gadisuka kambing hitam.
Indonesia
0
0
1
7
Saa's🖤🎀
Saa's🖤🎀@oshshgrl·
@jongdaecreaming @701bluejays ngacaa breee. elu, Bkk stan sma stan ot9 yang ngedrag ot6. anyingg lu lupaa Sehun yg baru balik wamil udh didrag. gausahh bwa2 exo6 biar trio curut keliatan innocent🫩
Indonesia
1
1
0
477
NINE OR NONE がリツイート
BLACKMAMBA
BLACKMAMBA@THEOGBLACKMAMBA·
BTS saying ‘pull up at your block’ and ‘pop pop pop’, you are from Korea
English
86
5K
42.7K
681.4K
NINE OR NONE がリツイート
🍤
🍤@kyojinchi·
sm wanting the revenue for their solo stuff without doing shit is VILE
best of 백현이 ❤️@bestofbyunbaek

Separating Facts from Allegations in the SM–CBX Dispute — Q. Is the lawsuit against CBX about unpaid IP fees or illegal IP use? Reports that CBX failed to pay IP‑related fees stem from SM’s claims and remain disputed. Verified coverage indicates that SM’s lawsuit seeks to enforce a 10% contractual royalty tied to IP use and prior agreements. The matter is a contractual dispute over payment terms, not a confirmed case of illegal IP use. — Q. Did CBX just want to benefit without paying IP fees? Wrong. CBX proposed paying IP fees to SM, but SM did not respond. IP fees: payment for music and brands owned by others. (e.g. EXO brand and contents) Revenue: what CBX earns from their own individual activities (tours, albums) before deducting costs such as production, staff, and management. SM is asking for 10% of gross revenue, not profit. — Q. Then how were they able to perform older songs at concerts? Performance rights are separate from master ownership. Even if SM owns the masters, songs are registered with copyright bodies like the Korea Music Copyright Association (KOMCA). As long as the concert organizer or venue pays the required licensing fees to the appropriate organization, artists are generally allowed to perform their songs live. However, the exact scope depends on contract terms and legal outcomes. There might be restrictions regarding the broadcast of those songs on TV. — Q. Did CBX continue using SM’s copyrighted IP without paying fees? No. CBX did not continue using SM’s copyrighted IP without paying fees. After the dispute, fans observed that they rebranded from “EXO-CBX” to “CBX,” avoided SM-owned masters and back vocals, and relied on rearranged versions or live band performances. Concert organizers paid licensing fees to KOMCA, which administers performance rights separately from master ownership. Reputable reports confirm the dispute was about contracts and revenue-sharing, not unauthorized IP use.

English
0
3
10
212
NINE OR NONE
NINE OR NONE@jongdaecreaming·
@gloxyfan Wheres that “behind members” narrative you just be saying and addng spices to hate on CBX every single time it’s just so funny.
English
0
1
1
45
NINE OR NONE がリツイート
miolo
miolo@irisungi·
@gloxyfan hating on cbx to support sm abusive ass is something. yall were probably the same people who hated on jyj for speaking out too
English
0
2
14
478
NINE OR NONE がリツイート
✴︎𝑔𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑒🥀
✴︎𝑔𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑒🥀@bbhumblebee·
The fandom wasn't necessarily divided because of the lawsuit It has become divided slowly way before... The lawsuit just made people show their bias or bad/good opinions and assumptions about exos relationship with eachother, making them trust or not, like or dislike or even hate some members And tbh this was caused in years... because people didn't get to see the group together too much outside an official schedule all these years before 2023-2024.. Because of the super long hiatus.. because SM never cared if they make the fandom suffer and then turn against each other and ofc against some of the members...
English
1
6
11
255
NINE OR NONE
NINE OR NONE@jongdaecreaming·
Well because that member from that group decided to leave the group, where in exo case, 3 members are being excluded by force when the 3 wanted to join group activities. Your stupid brains won’t understand this
J@jlu_jo

Why don't we give the same kindness to the 6 members who chose to continue as a group? Reading this from stans from other group- ohh relatable. Exactly, EXO-Ls did not give the same kindness to 6 members who never did wrong in the first place🙂‍↕️

English
0
0
0
19
NINE OR NONE がリツイート
min baek's Girl🎀🍓
min baek's Girl🎀🍓@SinaExo·
@Got7_aghase12 @yeoli_peoli Having a backbone isn't bad .. true exols boycotted because they only want to see exo as 9 after all these years they won't accept anything sm offers them + to show the company the fans aren't happy about that so it don't do it again it's so simple but you choose ignorance
English
0
4
42
476
NINE OR NONE
NINE OR NONE@jongdaecreaming·
@Got7_aghase12 @yeoli_peoli Im exol, before all this bullshit. I am spending my most times defending EXO from haters, buying their stuffs, doing masstream for them. But yeah im the bad one for boycotting in purpose to disagree with exlusions of the 3 exo members.
English
0
0
1
31
directioner
directioner@Got7_aghase12·
@yeoli_peoli People who Boycotted were never exols to begin with idc but it is always support all members but the ones who boycotted sided with 3 members and left the 6 down while they worked their ass off for the comeback
English
5
0
11
6.2K
NINE OR NONE がリツイート
Alice K
Alice K@AliceK5312·
@RollingStone Spreading lies, shame on you Rolling Stone. It was only 25k and 15k civil servants
Alice K tweet media
English
5
16
519
7.5K
NINE OR NONE がリツイート
۟
۟@mndublinkk·
Guys, Rate all community notes as “HELPFUL” x.com/i/birdwatch/t/…
۟ tweet media
English
0
144
626
12.2K
twelvezero
twelvezero@yours459604·
OT9ers please read this again and again and again and again until you get it.
INTLKAI@kaiarchived

[TRANS] The 8th Album REVERXE by EXO 'Thanks To' message by Kai "THANKS TO. Every single person and moment in time that helped bring me to this album. First off—to you, who put trust in me and waited for this album. With every [album release], I learn again and again just how encouraged, uplifted, and grateful I feel to have someone whose heart understands me without needing an explanation. In the end, it was you who motivated me to promise myself that I wouldn't let waiting become a given, that I wouldn't let the love directed towards me wither away. "Thank you" will never be enough, but today, I really do want to say it no matter what. Thank you." (Continued...) #KAI #카이 #カイ #金钟仁 #엑소카이 @weareoneEXO

English
0
2
20
1.1K
NINE OR NONE がリツイート
An OT9 fanbase On CBX SIDE
An OT9 fanbase On CBX SIDE@EXOLsChallenges·
SM has only media play as weapon. Baekhyun is norminated eveywhere. CBX is booked and busy with fansigns festivals global incoming activities. Stop worrying. Go vote and stream instead. Your worry dont help artists but your votes and streams DO HELP.
English
0
18
44
558
NINE OR NONE
NINE OR NONE@jongdaecreaming·
Most exol losers hated CBX for 100, CGW, Mc Mong bullshits when this is not the issue they should focus on, as the issue is always between CBX and SM and how SM treated their artists like shits for asking the fair treatments.
best of 백현이 ❤️@bestofbyunbaek

📢 [READ] CBX Contract Dispute Explained: — 1. 2011 – Original Contract • Baekhyun signed a standard 7-year exclusive contract with SM Entertainment in May 2011, along with the members of EXO. The contract period was counted from the group’s first album release. • Shortly after debut, the members reportedly signed an additional 3-year extension, mainly due to overseas promotions. - The clause automatically extends the contract until the required number of albums is released. • SM Entertainment had previously received corrective measures stating that contracts should not exceed 7 years. It was introduced by Korea FTC after earlier SM contract disputes. • Including Bekhyun’s military service hiatus (which pauses the contract), his contract was expected to end in early 2024 — roughly 13 years in total. 2. Late 2022 – 5-Year Pre-Signed Extension (2024–2029) Before his original contract expired, Byun Baekhyun signed a 5-year extension (2024–2029) with SM Entertainment while still enlisted in the military. • Reported pressure: Baekhyun’s side later stated that the renewal was signed under pressure. They claimed he was singled out and told that other members would receive certain benefits only if he signed. • “Sign now, cancel later” claim: His legal team stated he was told, “Sign now; you can cancel it later before the contract activates.” At the time, about one year remained on his original contract, and he was reportedly told changes could be made before January 2024. It was implied that refusing to sign collectively could also pose risks to the group’s stability. • Revision requests: CBX’s legal representative, Lee Jae-hak, stated that contract revisions were requested eight times, but none were accepted. • Settlement data requests: Starting in March 2023, Baekhyun, along with Chen and Xiumin, requested transparent settlement data (“provision”) under their contract and the Popular Culture and Arts Industry Development Act. • CBX stated they made multiple formal requests (commonly cited as seven), but were denied copies. • SM disputed this, stating that the data was made available for on-site inspection, but not for copying. • Termination notice: On June 1, 2023, CBX formally submitted a notice of termination for the extension contract set to begin in 2024, citing lack of settlement transparency. Presentation: canva.link/xve2k4tfj8ko9hi Full list of sources: bit.ly/CBXclarificati…

English
0
0
0
84

ディスカバー

@oshshgrl @701bluejays @gloxyfan @snow6lake98838 @Got7_aghase12 @yeoli_peoli @elonmusk @BarackObama