Виктория Малясова

@crumbraven @JeffLadish The joke is you don't have to press any buttons. It's just you and your clones on the island, who's gonna make you?

@JeffLadish i’m confused. the red button is just instant death and the blue is possible death? i pick blue every time. is this a joke im not getting?

You find yourself trapped on an island with 99 identical copies of yourself. If you press the red button, you will certainly die. If you press the blue button, you’ll die if and only if at least half of the clones presses blue. What do you do?

@JeffLadish I'll go gather coconuts while my clones build a shelter and prepare a signal fire.

@_fl1pped_ Girl, if you're only now finding out for the first time that you come off as weird sometimes, maybe you're pretty normal after all. The really weird people find out in kindergarten!

@DerekPederson3 Since it's the whole earth voting, your inflection point shouldn't, ideally, be affected by your personal life experiences much. You should think of all the societies on Earth, their trust levels and their populations, and guess what the average Earth vote would be.

So it's ultimately a threshold question. In a high trust society, your inflection point here should be well above 50% whereas in a low trust society your inflection point is likely below 50%.

Okay, for real, I like mocking Team Red but it's not as simple as people suggest. Presumably, almost everyone would vote Red if the requisite threshold were 99% and almost everyone would vote Blue if the requisite threshold were 1%.

@47fucb4r8c69323 Because most possible goals, when sufficiently optimized for, require the eradication of humanity. Humans are taking up space and consuming resources that AI could use for something else.

Why would you believe future AI desires will be unpredictable but then assert with confidence that a future AI will kill all humanity? I am too stupid to understand this, can someone explain? (and yes this is from Yud's book)

@bwillems1000 @GiffLasta Kind of feels like they're painting incels with broad strokes here.

@GiffLasta What a selective enforcement of that rule! “Incel talking points” never seemed to catch flak from the moderators! 😂

For those of you wondering why I was banned on the r/deadbedrooms subreddit two years ago, this was my offending comment:

@GiffLasta /r DeadBeadrooms bans "incel talking points". This is hilarious.

Which was removed for its clear violation of their rules:

А за аутизм врачи выписывают какие-нибудь вкусные наркотики или это просто ебучее неудобство на всю жизнь? А по результатам теста я могу получить гражданство?

@galitodev @DavidSartor0 @allTheYud @AaronBergman18 @grok advice how to stay sane and otherwise acting responsibly.

@galitodev @DavidSartor0 @allTheYud @AaronBergman18 @grok There are undoubtedly people in the community who have gone off the deep end in various ways, but I don't see any evidence of the leaders "fostering" it. On the contrary, I see them repeatedly warning people against violence, discouraging the use of mind-altering drugs, giving

“You’re not allowed to say what you believe and also explicitly and loudly reject violence because someone somewhere might become violent” is a terrible policy and not a world I want to live in

@galitodev @DavidSartor0 @allTheYud @AaronBergman18 @grok I haven't heard of those, and now that I have, I don't know if they should be attributed to antiextinctionists or not. The "no data centers" guy sounds more like those people concerned about water usage. The anti-AI sentiment is quite popular, and there are many insane people.

@malsova1 @DavidSartor0 @allTheYud @AaronBergman18 @grok Yes it is. It is 1 OOM away in violence but several OOMs away in members of movement age. Moreover you’re ignoring or choosing to discount other attacks and violent threats like the ones linked. wired.com/story/openai-o… apnews.com/article/indian…

@galitodev @DavidSartor0 @allTheYud @AaronBergman18 @grok It's not nearing the same OOM of violence. It's not fair to compare successful attacks by one movement to total attacks by another movement. Grok said there were 39 attacks by antinuclear movement. There were 2 attacks on Sam Altman (and unclear who was behind the second one).

@DavidSartor0 @malsova1 @allTheYud @AaronBergman18 @grok If the problem was that “more violence” was taken as an absolute and not a relative to size of movement members and movement age. Ok, fine. I was wrong. Can we now engage with the fact that a movement likely 1000x or more smaller and younger is nearing the same OOM of violence?

@rwlesq @keysmashbandit Stop overusing the word "basically" and you're good, chatgpt is just making it less readable.

@keysmashbandit There's a reason why I didn't just cut and paste ChatGPT's response, but I think the final product is better having run it by ChatGPT and considered its input.

Please, I'm begging you, try to critically examine the differences between these two pieces of writing. ChatGPT editing did not improve this. Every single change only served to weaken your claims significantly. Everything is now hedged into oblivion: no longer have you outlined a "problem," now it's merely a "flaw." "It is true" now demoted to "it appears to be the case." "Is" gets a "usually" tacked on. A thesis statement at the end of the first paragraph gets run over by noisy, out-of-context example-whittling. All for fear of being misconstrued. And at the end, the argument that gets spat out isn't even yours anymore! You argued that Graeber failed to create a true account of work because he did not understand Chesterton's Fence. ChatGPT is arguing is that it is possible some apparently bullshit jobs could be secretly load-bearing if you squint. These are two different statements. The second is weaker and less compelling. It says less. And it's fucking longer! Don't do this anymore! Stop doing this! It's worse!!!

@AcervoGinevra Idk, why do I keep asking my husband our wifi password? It's been the same for years.

tava lendo pedra filosofal e notei a molly perguntando o nome da plataforma pra ir pra hogwarts, mas tipo, ela estudou anos lá, além de que todos os filhos dela iam pra hogwarts??? como q esquece

@ollywand3r The people you named weren't random, they were either personally involved in the "gangs", or at least their children were. There's a reason Hermione hid her parents.

@ollywand3r Is this ragebait? They died in the war.

@galitodev @allTheYud @AaronBergman18 @grok Motte-and-bailey fallacy!

@allTheYud @AaronBergman18 @grok This is very very little violence for a movement that had millions of adherents and was active for many years. In comparison, the safety movement is several OOMs smaller and is younger and almost tied it in number of deaths yesterday, my sweet sweet daddy.

@egirlian @aelgotha @robbensinger Ok, now just understand that ainotkilleveryoneists are trying to actually change things, not persuade you of their conviction.

From the appendix of If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies:

@xriskology You mean they talked about how that would be bad?

A reminder that people in the EA and Rationalist communities have explicitly talked about using violence -- murdering AI researchers, sending bombs to DeepMind and OpenAI. Yudkowsky himself said he would have bombed Wuhan labs to prevent Covid. Etc.