
Should a sitting U.S. president be removed and criminally convicted if the evidence supports it? A. Yes B. No
Mr. Curious
23.6K posts


Should a sitting U.S. president be removed and criminally convicted if the evidence supports it? A. Yes B. No






THIS ISN'T ELECTION SECURITY – IT'S VOTER SUPPRESSION WITH A DRESS CODE Folks, let's stop pretending this is about protecting democracy. Trump's top legislative obsession is called the SAVE America Act. Sounds heroic, doesn't it? Of course it does. They always do. You don't call it the "Let's Turn Voting Into A DMV Appointment That Requires Documents You Lost In The Move" Act. No, no – you wrap it in a flag, slap a bald eagle on the press release, and pray nobody reads past the title. Somebody read past the title. Here's what the SAVE America Act actually requires to cast a ballot. Documented proof of citizenship to register. Government-issued ID to vote. Restricted mail-in access. And if you can't produce the paperwork? BETTER LUCK NEXT DEMOCRACY. Translation: make voting just hard enough that working families, seniors, college students, and anyone who has ever moved, lost a wallet, or simply doesn't keep their birth certificate in a waterproof safe – looks at the process and says: "FORGET IT." And THAT is the point. That has always been the point. Because here's the thing nobody in a pressed suit on cable news will say out loud: VOTER SUPPRESSION ISN'T A FLUKE – IT'S THE FEATURE OF THIS PRESIDENT. We live in a country where actual documented voter fraud is rarer than a bipartisan standing ovation, yet suddenly we need a notarized paper trail just to do the one thing a democracy literally requires of its citizens. That's not election security. That's a VELVET ROPE OUTSIDE THE POLLING BOOTH – and the bouncer has very specific ideas about the guest list. Now here's the part where the sarcasm takes a coffee break, because this is the part that matters. If Democrats ever take back power? Investigations happen. Subpoenas land. Receipts come out. And suddenly this isn't about elections at all – it's about something much more personal. It's about ACCOUNTABILITY. And accountability, it turns out, is the one thing this crowd fears more than a fair election. So ask yourself the only question that matters here. If voter fraud is genuinely minuscule – and it is – if elections are already secure – and they are – then who, exactly, is this law protecting? Because it sure as hell is not protecting the voter. If a company changed its hiring process to require documents that only certain applicants could easily produce – and fraud in the old process was statistically nonexistent – would "we just want it to be fair" survive thirty seconds in a courtroom? Of course not. The settlement would be announced before the ink dried. But this is the United States Congress. So we get a patriotic acronym and a vote along party lines. That's not security. That's POWER MAINTAINING ITSELF WITH A PERMISSION SLIP. Voting is not a privilege to be rationed. Democracy is not a document you earn. And a law that makes it harder to vote – while fraud is virtually nonexistent – is not election security. It is a LOCKED DOOR. And they built it on purpose. ________________ Share this if you believe a filing cabinet full of paperwork should never BE AN OBSTACLE between an American citizen and a ballot. #SAVEAct #VoterSuppression #GrandfathersAgainstRiggedRules And that's the way this grandpa and political satirist sees it.


Reporter: If you could say something to Trump, what would it be? PA voter: You’re a worthless pile of sh*t. Reporter: How many times did you vote for him? PA voter: 3 times. That was my bad. Apparently I’m an idiot.




