Munris

Finally revealing what I’ve been cooking last few weeks I’m the founder of @poly_score - the ultimate tool to track your real performance on Polymarket. We calculate your score based on PnL, volume, prediction accuracy, and ROI efficiency. Check your stats: polyscore.app Huge shoutout to @zefirium_crypto for the big brain energy on the algo 👊

a new project just dropped inside the @Polymarket ecosystem. polyscore is basically ethos but for polymarket, you can see any trader's score directly on twitter thanks to their extension. keep building.

Introducing Polyscore A transparent, fair rating system for Polymarket traders. Every trader starts at 1000 Score. Your score changes based on real trading results. Let me explain how it works

Polyscore rates traders based on their actual performance. No more “trust me bro, I know this market.” Trader Score doesn’t lie. Launch Tomorrow.

See their Trading Score on X and instantly know who to trust. No more Polymarket research - just read X and copy bets.

Polyscore is being created to identify Profitable Traders based on their trading performance. Our platform and browser extension will become available in the coming days.

Allora: The Biggest Deception of 2025 - How a Promising Project Betrayed Its Own Community Let’s start with the basics. @AlloraNetwork @AlloraLabsHQ @AlloraFND didn’t just make a mistake - they betrayed the very community that built and supported them. They didn’t reward the people who ran their network, tested it, and helped it grow. They gave *nothing* to those who made Allora possible. The Worker and EVM Points Era There were two official points programs in Allora: Worker Points (for node operators) and EVM Points (for on-chain activities, including PancakeSwap, where users actually spent real money). From the start, the team themselves - moderators, developers, and even official documentation - clearly said that these programs were incentivized. It’s easy to verify: just search “incentivized” in their Discord. You’ll find dozens of messages confirming it. But when it came time for the rewards? Nothing. Not a single airdrop for those who spent months, and in some cases over a year, running their nodes and contributing to the network. A year ago, a community member scraped the leaderboard - it had 142,000 wallets. Today, if you parse the same leaderboard, you’ll find only 29,000 wallets and they received only boost! No allocation to those who helped with allora growth. Right before tokenomics were announced, they quietly deleted over 100,000 users - keeping only those with more than 15.5 points. When asked why, they said nothing. The @roshpatel paradox Rosh, one of the most visible team members, once said: “So by you saying you have 12 points, it’s likely that your model did not contribute to the network’s collective intelligence.” But in the same breath, he also admitted: “12 points were retroactively rewarded to every registered worker node, irrespective of quality.” So everyone got 12 points “just because”, and now Prime eligibility starts from 10 worker points. Meaning - those who supposedly “didn’t contribute” still qualify for Prime tiers. It’s pure contradiction. Allora Prime - A Paywall in Disguise When Allora announced Allora Prime, I actually thought it was a smart idea - a way to let people stake their rewards and earn more over time. But I was wrong. Allora Prime isn’t a reward system. It’s a paywall. Instead of receiving tokens for their work, community members are now being asked to *buy* ALLO from the market and *stake it for 9 months* — just for a “chance” to earn something back from a 2.5% pool. Here’s what their own infographic shows: * Tier 3: 10+ worker points → 10,000 ALLO minimum stake (~$6,000) * Tier 2: 700+ worker points → 100,000 ALLO (~$56,000) * Tier 1: 3000+ worker points → 1,000,000 ALLO (~$560,000) So let’s get this straight - a regular guy who ran nodes in 2024 has to now buy $6,000 worth of tokens and lock them for nine months to *hope* for a reward? That’s absurd. It’s clear now: Allora Prime exists only to support token price, not to reward contributors. The $NICK Token Scam Let’s talk about the elephant in the room - the $NICK token. During the meme coin hype, Allora jumped in too, launching their own “fun” token named after their CEO, Nick. They even made Discord roles for it: > “We’ve been watching, we’ve been loving the vibe of the NICK community. > That’s why we’re dropping these new roles: > @Nick OG for the day-one NICKtardios | 35K $NICK > @Nick Whale for the NICK heavyweights | 5M $NICK.” It was meant to be funny and community-driven. Now the $NICK token’s FDV is $56,000. People lost millions. The team can deny their connection to $NICK all they want - but you can still earn the Nick roles *today* by buying the token. Meanwhile, when users buy $NICK, developer wallets keep selling. I experienced this personally - I bought the token, lost money, and watched the dev wallets dump it right after. And here comes the most insulting part: Nick OG and Nick Whale roles were added to the Prime boost list. So after losing thousands of dollars on $NICK, these same people are now told to buy $ALLO and stake it for nine months. It’s like saying: “Hey idiot, you lost money before? Lose it again - this time, buy our new token for $50,000.” It’s pure madness. After the backlash, someone named “zaddddddy” suddenly appeared in Discord (a random staff member with 58 total messages, none of them meaningful) and said: “Yes, this is correct - there is no minimum stake amount required for those who received Prime tiers through the portal.” So first they make a fancy chart with minimum stakes up to $560k, and then they pretend it was “misunderstood.” No official update. No correction. Just confusion and silence. Airdrop Reality Based on the data from the first leaderboard (thanks to @chtototamprocryp (crypto telegram channel)for sharing the parsed data), out of 141,000 participants, only 176 wallets received any airdrop. [LIVE] Processed: 78,747 / 151,625 With drop: 66 Empty: 78,681 Total airdrop: 347,756 ALLO That’s less than 0.1% of contributors. Meanwhile, 9.3% of the total supply (the “Community Allocation”) remains untouched. It’s clear that the majority of the real contributors - workers, testers, builders - were completely ignored. Team and Red Flags Shortly before the mainnet, several key team members left the project quietly: Archita, Emi, Kevin (Co-Founder), Too_Fly, Kush Dave, and others. No announcements. No transparency. Just vanished. Whenever people leave right before a mainnet launch, it’s a bad sign. I’ve seen it before - it usually means they don’t want their names tied to what’s about to happen. The Final Hypocrisy And the cherry on top - just days before the token checker went live, CEO @nickemmons proudly tweeted about buying a new house in New York. The timing couldn’t be more ironic. The community that trusted and built Allora gets nothing, and the CEO celebrates a luxury purchase. How can you even post that after betraying thousands of people? The “Random” Distribution Scandal Even more absurdly, Allora’s CEO Nick publicly admitted that the point-based airdrop distribution was random. In his own words: “Random actually is fair.” “If every single wallet got distribution, everyone would get dust.” So why did they even bother creating a leaderboard? Thousands of people competed for months to climb in rankings, believing their hard work and contribution would matter — only to find out it was completely random. Now, chaos has erupted in the official Discord. The CEO himself is asking users to DM their wallets so he can “look into it” and “send allocations” manually — apparently to calm the most frustrated members. It’s a total circus. Conclusion - The Community Deserves Better This isn’t just my story. I’m writing this on behalf of the entire Allora community. We believed in the project. We spent time, energy, and real money helping it grow. Now, after all this - no rewards, no clarity, no respect. Instead, we got contradictions, arrogance, and a system designed to make us buy tokens we should have earned. The numbers don’t lie: * Nick OG: 2,700 users * Nick Whale: 50 users * Forge: 236 users * Yappers: 237 users Add that up and you’ll see - they didn’t distribute 9% to the community. They *stole it*. And to the people who lost money on the $NICK token, they have the audacity to say: “Hey, buy $ALLO and stake it for 9 months.” It’s insulting. It’s dishonest. And it’s wrong. I truly hope Allora reconsiders the disaster they’ve created. Because if they don’t - this will go down as one of the biggest rug pulls of 2025.

@0xCygaar Not the best solution. It will make speculating, finding new ways to get XP, and holding ecosystem NFTs/tokens pointless, because whales can just farm XP with more money IMHO

Starting next week, we will start giving XP for users that provide liquidity on Abstract. Obviously one of the biggest critiques thus far has been lack of liquidity in certain pools which has led to large price swings. Eligible pairs will mostly be majors (ETH, PENGU, USDC, USDT) to start with more tokens added in the future after we see how this plays out.

Abstract @AbstractChain On Twitter and Telegram, I’ve seen lots of different badge and tier statistics - but they’re always inconsistent. So, I decided to compile my own. I used my own software to collect addresses from the blockchain, taking every address that had any interaction with the network - a total of 2,530,000. After that, using the official API, I gathered data on the number of badges and the tier each wallet falls into. Badges: 0: 1.8M 1–5 (basic badges): 255K 6–10: 393K 11–15: 47K 16–20: 8,100 21+: 3,966 Tiers: Bronze: 570K (actually more, since empty accounts also get this badge, but it doesn’t really matter) Silver: 146K Gold: 6,858 Platinum: 184 Diamond: 0 You can explore the data yourself in GPT and check whatever stats you’re interested in. I’m sharing the final CSV with the data drive.google.com/file/d/1IHqGDK…

Wow, the hype around the @tenprotocol sale is crazy - I requested a $2000 allocation, but only got $500. Everyone wants to buy in

. @boundless_xyz one step away from gold tier

@CircuitAI @0xfoobar @11AMdotclub how is it works? you said "run on your own wallet", so that's not internal wallet (like it was on Newton). how you did it safe for user?

"My wallet made 100 transactions for me overnight while I slept, and that's just the coolest thing in the world to wake up to." @0xfoobar discussing Circuit with @11AMdotclub

@0xfoobar @CircuitAI thanks for the answer! for now it's only an idea, I will wait public stage, any dates for us? weeks/months

@munris_tech @CircuitAI Both! If you're interested in integrating Circuit agents into your own app UI, please reach out

I've tried over a dozen "agent" products, but they're all fake. All the buzzwords, but you can't actually use them for anything. Just token launchpads with vague AI branding @CircuitAI changes this. Real agent finance, making real transactions on your existing wallet Circuit

@Ringia4 @RialoHQ L1 on SVM. Will be it useless or not we will see, but their mission is promising. At least they have a mission 😀

@munris_tech @RialoHQ Decided to make your own L2?

Tired of the same old L1s and L2s that solve nothing in Web3? A new project has just launched, that promises to change that and deliver a whole new user experience with blockchain. @RialoHQ is rethinking blockchain from the ground up built to connect with the real world, power real use cases, and deliver seamless experiences for real people.

A message to @SuccinctLabs Team & Succinct Discord users. Recently, I’ve seen Discord users mocking the on-chain or testnet users who received 20–200 $PROVE. (That behavior is not just disrespectful- it’s embarrassing. You're not above anyone. Everyone deserves respect. Humility isn’t a weakness, try it sometime.) 🫵🏻 If you truly believe in fairness, answer this: 1. First let's start with the gamified Testnet. You are saying that we only played games for some hours in the whole six months and don't deserve the rewards, right? Then tell me why did the @SuccinctLabs team come up with the idea of gamified Testnet & gate it to 25k users only? Only to blame testnet players in the last? Clearly, the goal wasn’t just playing games, we were testing the core product and helping generate actual proofs. 2. The main motive of Succinct Testnet was to generate proofs while playing the games. Each star earned in the UI directly reflected a successful proof generated in the backend. We were the One Who Helped @SuccinctLabs in testing their main product and helped generate proofs, finding bugs & errors to improve the overall system. Not your Discord spam message contributed in a single way to generate proofs or test their products. We helped test the actual product. Know the difference before mocking testnet users. 3. We were early we get access to Succinct testnet stage 1. Now you joined late, you grinded hard & You get:- Stage 1, Stage 2, Stage 2.5 and Now HUGE REWARDS. That's ok. Apparently Succinct already rewarding you fairly from the start. THEN why are you HATING US to get rewarded just for being early in Stage 1? Also, you’ll be claiming your $PROVE on-chain, not on X or Discord. So why criticize the on-chain users? Aren’t you one too? It’s not us. It’s the TEAM that failed in fair distribution(but don't know what's really going on in their mind.) $PROVE Airdrop Allocation: 5% It seems like: ▪️ Stage 1 users: 1% ▪️ Discord users & top contributors: 4% The team needs to reallocate the $PROVE airdrop with proper multipliers, for example: Stage 1 users- 1x Stage 2 users- 1.25x X or Discord contributors- 1.5x ALL IN SUCCINCT- 2x Top contributors- 4-5x That’s how fair distribution should look. But we know Discord spammers will never support this, they’re already happy with their allocation. If they really have gotten the same allocation then the scenario you can imagine :) 🫳🏻 If you made the Testnet Only to play games & generate proofs, Then what’s wrong with rewarding your real testnet players here? 🫴🏻 Let’s talk honestly; .@SuccinctFND failed to reward their actual product users. So, what next? Forward to: @pumatheuma @jtguibas @0xCRASHOUT @advaith @DanHennessy @mattstam @chasedevens @fakedev9999 @theedwardli 4th Img credit: @CryptoHindiO.

@OphirParwez @SuccinctLabs @0xCRASHOUT @advaith what about u?

@munris_tech @SuccinctLabs @0xCRASHOUT @advaith When did you log into Discord? Try showing me what month you logged in?

When you see dozens of screenshots showing allocations of 10,000–60,000 $PROVE @SuccinctLabs, don’t forget that there are thousands of people who received just 20 $PROVE after spending half a year participating in the testnet. @0xCRASHOUT @advaith will you repost this result? 🥰

@LFTokenz01 @SuccinctLabs @0xCRASHOUT @advaith cry for what? If you’re happy with that allocation, then I’m happy for you. I just not happy with mine. that’s all

@munris_tech @SuccinctLabs @0xCRASHOUT @advaith Now what? Gonna cry now?