BugBoy

@soupsofnamek @jacobfsquared @XanderhalTV The stories main point is to focus on Bear & his character, the director due to this makes the willow not an “actor” in the story so that we focus on him. If you have criticism of thats your right. But it feels like you do not want to actualy be open to a new perspective

@reallyintoants @jacobfsquared @XanderhalTV YOUR COMMENT WAS UNCLEAR/BAD SO IM INSERTING A DEMONIC ENTITY THAT KILLS MOTHERFUCKERS WHILE YOU'RE TRAPPED IN YOUR OWN MIND WATCHING WHILE THEY FUCK PEOPLE. IM A GOOD GUY.

Curry Barker literally confirmed the Wishing Willow isn't even a little cursed or tricky, Bear's wish was just evil.

@soupsofnamek @jacobfsquared @XanderhalTV As the OP said, the wish to have someone love you more than anyone else (be obsessed with you) is inherently an evil/twisted curse. That’s the central message of the movie, wanting someone that is obsessed with you is inherently a dangerous and bad wish

@jacobfsquared @reallyintoants @XanderhalTV SO INSTEAD OF SAYING "HEY YOUR WISH IS IMPOSSIBLE" IT IMPLANTED A MURDEROUS OBSESSIVE SPIRIT TO INHABIT HER BODY AND MAKE HER A PRISONER WHILE SHE'S ESSENTIALLY RAPED. IDK DOESNT SEEM LIKE THE ACTIONS OF A GOOD-GUY WISH GRANTER TO ME

@soupsofnamek @XanderhalTV Not every story needs to be open to the same level of interpretation. Some art can have heavy implications / direct intent while other more vague / open to interpretation.

@XanderhalTV WOW I LOVE WHEN WRITERS/DIRECTORS JUST LEAVE NOTHING TO INTERPRETATION WOW IT'S SO COOL

@foolibuster Holy shit

reflection

@spiderking232 Yes, yes there is. Summarized; Personal property is land used to satisfy personal needs. Private property is used for commodity production. Communists are not after your house or toothbrush.

@reallyintoants There is no difference between personal and private property. Personal Property is just a specific subset of private property. And Communism is an inherently self-contradicting ideology. It is self-destructive and evil. There is nothing to misunderstand. It is envy made manifest.

I don't call people.communist for being generous. I call them communist for being generous woth resources that don't belong to them. I'm sorry, but my property is not yours to give, and my life is not yours to define.

@Endomortosis @stolperson @JackingSwag @terrifiedone Prisoners are legally not allowed to refuse work, and are often punished for doing so. What do we call it when one is forced to work? You claim slavery has been abolished and yet both in the amendment and in physical reality it has not.

@reallyintoants @stolperson @JackingSwag @terrifiedone Working as intended. No slavery in the US, only work reform programs.

Currently food isn’t a right and we have enslaved farmers

@Endomortosis @stolperson @JackingSwag @terrifiedone

@reallyintoants @stolperson @JackingSwag @terrifiedone Working as intended. You don't get to retain all rights as a criminal. Hence the whole involuntarily being locked up part

@Endomortosis @stolperson @JackingSwag @terrifiedone

@stolperson @JackingSwag @terrifiedone Slavery is outlawed in the US. Got it. Fucking retard lol

@ballsucker116 @sigmahamster2 @icy710420 Almost like the point is not everything we see is true and comparing it to 1984 is childish

@reallyintoants @sigmahamster2 @icy710420 your comparison is INARGUABLY ass and I want you to stew on what you just said for a bit.

Incorrect. Stop race baiting. Bail judges account for ‘flight risk and public safety’ but spell it out in the most messy, non-standardized way possible. They hand critics infinite race-baiting ammo. The gap isn’t some anti-white conspiracy. Karmelo Anthony (17/minor at the time, fatal stabbing, zero previous offenses, stable family, low perceived danger if bound to house) got a reduced $250k bond. Chud the Builder (Eatherly) (28, non-fatal public shooting, tons of fresh arrests, already out on bond, provocative streaming history) hit every red flag, e.g., crowd risk, pattern of trouble, so he got $1.25M, in Tennessee. Believe it or not, there are so many factors that go into bail that vary across states, all you have to do is 30 mins of research.

@ballsucker116 @sigmahamster2 @icy710420 “Dude that guy pulled a rabbit out of a hat” “No it was a magic trick dude” “Wow 1984 dude ‘your eyes are lying to you’ dude”

@sigmahamster2 @icy710420 "your eyes are lying to you"

@Banda821011 @BicameralGrind @justalexoki It’s basically the ship of Theseus dilemma. I recommend this video, really good intro to understanding how nothing “real” in a truthful way even if it’s “real” in a functional/use way: m.youtube.com/watch?v=fXW-Qj…

@reallyintoants @BicameralGrind @justalexoki Yeah I would say it’s different version of yourself similar to yourself one year ago for example. How would the hijacking work do they put their brain in their body or do they somehow transfer their consciousness but then we don’t really know what that is.

@Banda821011 @BicameralGrind @justalexoki But then if I am cloned, are both the “same person” if so then even though we have different experiences were the same, but also means someone could hijacker’s my body and now their me? There is no 100% way to define personhood. It’s useful to assume there is but it’s not there

@reallyintoants @BicameralGrind @justalexoki Are you not just different versions of the same person every moment? Your soul if you’re religious and your base genome if atheist doesnt change.

@Banda821011 @BicameralGrind @justalexoki There is a definition that’s more useful and one that is more truthful. It’s useful to say that me at 10 is also “me” as the continuation is useful for knowing change and me as a person. However if we talked about the actual reality then you a a new person every moment

@BicameralGrind @justalexoki So you think you’re a different person everyday? When you look at old photos do you not view that as yourself?

@Chris2Rue @AntAnt3334 @esjesjesj The very first original claim was simply to say that “I am lucky [happy that by chance I happen to be the being ] that exists in the west” That does not inherently mean guilt. Just admission that the being speaking (OP/Me/You) did not “earn” or do anything to be born here.

They’re so close to getting it

Esto es como si Zhukov te viniera en 1945 y te dijera que el poder de la bomba atómica es insignificante en comparación al materialismo dialectico

@DakkaNaysmith @Bestofsopranos But then she would owe him, it’s a deal with the devil.

@Bestofsopranos Tha fact that she could think of it in no context other than her personal revenge us what makes this decision the wrong one. She didnt merely renounce justice for herself but for all of society. It would have only been a good thing if Tony's men buried that POS.

The strongest person in the whole series

@Just_a_nut69 @blahhhhh1202 @ClumsyBitch1997 @BecomingCritter The flaw with this worldview is your interpreting my descriptive claims and prescriptive. We currently live in a society where men are by vast majority committing sexual assault. So ofc people will be more cautious / assume less good faith around situations like this.

Yes, anything relating to a woman is interpreted in good faith, and anything relating to a man in worst faith. thats the point. Its as if during any conversation about taking care of children people would automatically assume that mother wants hurt the child because women murder 100% of 73mln babies a year during abortions.

feel like this shouldn’t need to be said but having a rape fantasy isn’t the same as wanting to be raped

@Just_a_nut69 @blahhhhh1202 @ClumsyBitch1997 @BecomingCritter - or if they just like the actual attack itself. That’s not even considering the social context of men committing most rapes

@Just_a_nut69 @blahhhhh1202 @ClumsyBitch1997 @BecomingCritter You’re conflating two claims. When women says she has fantasy we see it in “good faith” as she has placed herself in the disempowered role However when men say they also are interested in say a noncon kink, it is hard to know if they mean it in good faith -