blaqGhostDeaD is dead

23.8K posts

blaqGhostDeaD is dead banner
blaqGhostDeaD is dead

blaqGhostDeaD is dead

@ruptalks

Frontend Dev . Music . Art . Ac Milan

参加日 Mart 2011
613 フォロー中255 フォロワー
固定されたツイート
blaqGhostDeaD is dead
blaqGhostDeaD is dead@ruptalks·
Q1 Motion Graphic showreel(2022)
Lagos, Nigeria 🇳🇬 English
2
1
6
0
blaqGhostDeaD is dead がリツイート
Pop Crave
Pop Crave@PopCrave·
Sade will be inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame.
Pop Crave tweet mediaPop Crave tweet media
English
956
16.3K
112.8K
2.6M
blaqGhostDeaD is dead がリツイート
JN✌🏽🎭
JN✌🏽🎭@Rlkjn22·
O tipo de mulher que vai aparecer na sua vida quando você tá desempregado e cheio de dívidas
Wonder@Wonderjnrr

Português
120
1.1K
11.6K
236K
blaqGhostDeaD is dead がリツイート
Alhaji
Alhaji@yeankhar·
Lmao Ahhhh
Alhaji tweet media
HT
92
72
324
933.5K
blaqGhostDeaD is dead がリツイート
Atlético de Madrid
Atlético de Madrid@atletienglish·
Dame un grrr.
Français
1.1K
4.7K
35.1K
909.6K
blaqGhostDeaD is dead がリツイート
chris
chris@LLCoolChris_·
@tosinolaseinde Let me introduce you to people from China and Korea
English
16
16
1.7K
133K
blaqGhostDeaD is dead がリツイート
jul 🐯
jul 🐯@papajoolia·
We worked on the aang movie for years with the expectation that’d we’d get to celebrate all of our hard work in theaters.. just to see people unceremoniously leak the film and pass our shots around on twitter like candy.. (1/3)
English
1.4K
10.6K
102.5K
5M
blaqGhostDeaD is dead
blaqGhostDeaD is dead@ruptalks·
I still have material on udemy. I hope they don't merge both platforms.
Gagan Biyani 🏛@gaganbiyani

People have asked me how I feel about Udemy’s sale to Coursera. Honestly, I’m kinda pissed about it. I want to be clear - I’m grateful for the opportunity to start and benefit from Udemy’s success. It changed my life. But there’s another side to Udemy. A story of what could have been. After our Series B, founders owned less than 30% of the company. Our investors took over and installed their own CEO to run it. We all liked this new CEO and honestly, for years it looked like a brilliant move. The company kept growing and growing. They launched B2B and built a $500M ARR business. Eventually, the company IPO’ed for $3B. Yet all along there were clear cracks under the surface. Over Udemy’s history, there have been 7 CEO’s. The board replaced the second CEO with dud after dud. I’d often try to meet with the board or the new CEO, and was completely ignored. Eren had influence as Chairman of the Board but Oktay and I were so ignored they didn’t even invite us to the IPO. LOL WTF. There are like 50+ people invited to these things and nobody thought: “oh maybe we should invite the people who fucking invented the thing we’re all celebrating.” It shows how little respect they had for founders and for product innovation as a discipline. I think they wanted a CEO they could control, a buttoned-up suit instead of a brash founder/CEO that is risk-taking, visionary, but a bit of a pain. For awhile, it looked like it didn’t even matter who was CEO - the company was run by the incredibly talented team that reported to them anyways. Well, it worked until it didn’t. The company made no major product innovations for 15 years. Instead, they took the original idea (video-based courses) and sold it in every place imaginable. It got us to $800M run-rate. That’s no joke; that takes serious execution and a great team that hustled hard to win the market. But eventually the consumer business stopped growing. The B2B business has now flattened out as well. Meanwhile, Coursera was catching up. Original Coursera was a far worse product than Udemy, but it got a ton of press. Learning ivory tower bullshit from academics doesn’t get you a real education, but it does create prestige. They raised from better investors on better terms, and had better leadership. Udemy to this day has more revenue than Coursera, but Coursera won the court of investor opinion. They got higher multiples from both private and public markets. Coursera innovated heavily. They added corporate courses to their university catalog, built fully-online degree programs, and offered a B2B competitor that kept Udemy on its toes. Still, the Udemy B2B business (and team) out-performed and so the two companies were deadlocked. Coursera was better at B2C, Udemy at B2B. A merger was inevitable. But WHY IN GODS NAME did we sell to Coursera instead of the other way around? Why are the combined companies under $3B in market cap? Three reasons: First, edtech didn’t live up to its promise. While these two companies had solid revenue and cash positions, their growth slowed, and public markets balked. This meant compressed multiples and significantly lower valuations. Second, the companies stopped innovating. They are selling a product to businesses that their customers don’t love. They were category leaders, but they lead the category into mediocrity. They captured a significant share of learning and development (L&D) spending, but L&D as a whole actually lost budget within their organizations. That’s Udemy’s fault, and it doesn’t even realize it. That brings me to my final point: I personally believe Udemy traded upside opportunity for downside risk. Us founders were unproven and young. We made lots of mistakes, including fighting amongst ourselves. A good investor would have supported us through it because they believe founders drive the highest long-term returns. Instead, they brought in outside CEOs to replace us. I sometimes wonder if they recognize this error; everyone makes mistakes and maybe they learned from it. Either way - the consequences are real. By ignoring the founders, Udemy failed to innovate, which led to slowing growth which led to mediocre public market results. Furthermore, they don’t have a good evangelist and public markets don’t like a headless horse. I sold my Udemy stock awhile ago. I think the merger was critical for both companies’ survival. Now, though, the new combined entity needs to innovate again. On B2B, Coursera needs to help L&D become the heroes of the AI era so the entire market starts growing again. On B2C, they need to build the most educational AI product on the planet. (I’d focus on the former, since the latter is a lot harder and riskier). Coursera can still achieve our original vision and likely build a $10B+ company in the meantime. Even though I’ve got no stake in its future, I’m mission-driven and I REALLY hope they figure it out. The current education system sucks and the world deserves something better.

English
0
0
0
29
blaqGhostDeaD is dead がリツイート
Gagan Biyani 🏛
Gagan Biyani 🏛@gaganbiyani·
People have asked me how I feel about Udemy’s sale to Coursera. Honestly, I’m kinda pissed about it. I want to be clear - I’m grateful for the opportunity to start and benefit from Udemy’s success. It changed my life. But there’s another side to Udemy. A story of what could have been. After our Series B, founders owned less than 30% of the company. Our investors took over and installed their own CEO to run it. We all liked this new CEO and honestly, for years it looked like a brilliant move. The company kept growing and growing. They launched B2B and built a $500M ARR business. Eventually, the company IPO’ed for $3B. Yet all along there were clear cracks under the surface. Over Udemy’s history, there have been 7 CEO’s. The board replaced the second CEO with dud after dud. I’d often try to meet with the board or the new CEO, and was completely ignored. Eren had influence as Chairman of the Board but Oktay and I were so ignored they didn’t even invite us to the IPO. LOL WTF. There are like 50+ people invited to these things and nobody thought: “oh maybe we should invite the people who fucking invented the thing we’re all celebrating.” It shows how little respect they had for founders and for product innovation as a discipline. I think they wanted a CEO they could control, a buttoned-up suit instead of a brash founder/CEO that is risk-taking, visionary, but a bit of a pain. For awhile, it looked like it didn’t even matter who was CEO - the company was run by the incredibly talented team that reported to them anyways. Well, it worked until it didn’t. The company made no major product innovations for 15 years. Instead, they took the original idea (video-based courses) and sold it in every place imaginable. It got us to $800M run-rate. That’s no joke; that takes serious execution and a great team that hustled hard to win the market. But eventually the consumer business stopped growing. The B2B business has now flattened out as well. Meanwhile, Coursera was catching up. Original Coursera was a far worse product than Udemy, but it got a ton of press. Learning ivory tower bullshit from academics doesn’t get you a real education, but it does create prestige. They raised from better investors on better terms, and had better leadership. Udemy to this day has more revenue than Coursera, but Coursera won the court of investor opinion. They got higher multiples from both private and public markets. Coursera innovated heavily. They added corporate courses to their university catalog, built fully-online degree programs, and offered a B2B competitor that kept Udemy on its toes. Still, the Udemy B2B business (and team) out-performed and so the two companies were deadlocked. Coursera was better at B2C, Udemy at B2B. A merger was inevitable. But WHY IN GODS NAME did we sell to Coursera instead of the other way around? Why are the combined companies under $3B in market cap? Three reasons: First, edtech didn’t live up to its promise. While these two companies had solid revenue and cash positions, their growth slowed, and public markets balked. This meant compressed multiples and significantly lower valuations. Second, the companies stopped innovating. They are selling a product to businesses that their customers don’t love. They were category leaders, but they lead the category into mediocrity. They captured a significant share of learning and development (L&D) spending, but L&D as a whole actually lost budget within their organizations. That’s Udemy’s fault, and it doesn’t even realize it. That brings me to my final point: I personally believe Udemy traded upside opportunity for downside risk. Us founders were unproven and young. We made lots of mistakes, including fighting amongst ourselves. A good investor would have supported us through it because they believe founders drive the highest long-term returns. Instead, they brought in outside CEOs to replace us. I sometimes wonder if they recognize this error; everyone makes mistakes and maybe they learned from it. Either way - the consequences are real. By ignoring the founders, Udemy failed to innovate, which led to slowing growth which led to mediocre public market results. Furthermore, they don’t have a good evangelist and public markets don’t like a headless horse. I sold my Udemy stock awhile ago. I think the merger was critical for both companies’ survival. Now, though, the new combined entity needs to innovate again. On B2B, Coursera needs to help L&D become the heroes of the AI era so the entire market starts growing again. On B2C, they need to build the most educational AI product on the planet. (I’d focus on the former, since the latter is a lot harder and riskier). Coursera can still achieve our original vision and likely build a $10B+ company in the meantime. Even though I’ve got no stake in its future, I’m mission-driven and I REALLY hope they figure it out. The current education system sucks and the world deserves something better.
English
152
327
2.6K
318.2K
blaqGhostDeaD is dead がリツイート
blaqGhostDeaD is dead がリツイート
diplo
diplo@diplo·
if you are a creative you need to adapt or just like give up and become an uber driver until everyone has a waymo. I know it’s not cool or classy to speak like this but i’m not gonna candy coat the future - it is what it is . sorry for bad new’s my purist . there will always need a human mind and touch because ai will never suffer from bipolar disorder and autism like me and other creative people 🤪
techbimbo@jameygannon

”You're not gonna win, there's no fighting AI” Diplo's take on AI is spot on, and he's ahead of 99% of creatives, across all disciplines > it's inevitable, and you're dumb if you don't use it > it's a tool, just like many other things before it > taste and references matter A LOT amazing interview by @DanielSWall

English
899
252
3K
1.9M
blaqGhostDeaD is dead がリツイート
Rizzy
Rizzy@Rizzy1c·
Sorry bro, there’s no "method" You owe the game at least 2 years before you see any real money.
English
139
789
6.8K
97.6K
blaqGhostDeaD is dead がリツイート
Ayo | Farm Tribe by AY 🇳🇬 🇹🇷 🌾🍫🫚
“He was killing chickens through their ANUS” A poultry farmer told me this today and I still can’t process it. He had a worker he trusted a lot. Anytime a chicken died, he’d hand it over to him. The guy said he feeds his dogs with it… sometimes sells to other dog owners. Fair enough. For months, everything looked normal. Then suddenly… Dead birds started increasing. Not small increase oh crazy numbers. Farmer got suspicious. Started digging. Went back to months of CCTV footage… What he found? The worker himself was killing the chickens. But wait that’s not even the worst part. The method? He would insert his hand through the chicken’s anus, pull out the organs, clean the body, and arrange it neatly like it just “died naturally.” Then take it home. Why? He had started a grilled chicken business. Yes you heard it right he started selling his boss’s “dead chickens” as fresh grilled chicken.
English
59
199
1.2K
57.6K
blaqGhostDeaD is dead がリツイート
𝕲𝖗𝖎𝖒.
𝕲𝖗𝖎𝖒.@sore_adebisi·
An artwork I created was taken, altered using AI, and then presented to an artist as if it was original work. When questioned, the person denied both using AI and copying my piece. I.G @sympli.zikky
𝕲𝖗𝖎𝖒. tweet media𝕲𝖗𝖎𝖒. tweet media
English
87
348
1.7K
100.1K
blaqGhostDeaD is dead がリツイート
Pharaoh👳🏾‍♂️👑
I totally agree with everything Solomon Buchi said in this video. Everything single thing and not a single lie told. Men are now wiser, no man is going to worship you because you’re beautiful. Who your beauty help??
English
462
2.9K
12K
591.5K