Pedro Troccoli

I was paying $229 for Screen Studio. Then I found this repo and uninstalled it the same night. Recordly is a free, MIT licensed screen recorder and editor that ships every feature I was paying for auto-zoom animations, cursor smoothing, motion blur, native macOS capture, and a full timeline editor. → Apple-style zoom animations with automatic suggestions from cursor activity → Native ScreenCaptureKit recording on macOS 12.3+ → Cursor smoothing, motion blur, click bounce, macOS-style cursor assets → Smooth pan transitions between zoom regions → Timeline trim, speed ramps, annotations, manual zoom spans → Wallpapers, gradients, padding, rounded corners, blur, drop shadows → MP4 and GIF export at any aspect ratio → .recordly project files so you can reopen edits later macOS, Windows, Linux. Scene composition runs on PixiJS. Native Swift helpers handle macOS cursor telemetry. 8.3k stars. MIT License. 100% Opensource github.com/webadderall/Re…

@acgfbr Usa qual encoding provider Antonio?

2026 e vcs ainda usam firefox lá vai eu investigar o codec

Polymaths in this era will be undefeated

@LundukeJournal It’s fucking true

Can anyone in Brazil confirm this?

@dionisiodev Não precisa

Eu não quero ofender ngm, mas realmente quero entender. O que o dev ganharia com uma regulação do estado? Pra que um dev precisa de um sindicato? Perdoem a minha ignorância.

I am the CEO of Palantir Technologies. The company is worth a quarter of a trillion dollars. I did not misspeak. Two hundred and forty-nine billion. The stock is up 320% in the past 12 months. The product is surveillance. I do not use that word at conferences. At conferences, I say "data integration," "operational intelligence," or "decision advantage." These mean the same thing. Surveillance is the honest version. I save the honest version for rooms where honesty is a competitive advantage. I gave a speech on March 3 at the Andreessen Horowitz American Dynamism Summit. "American Dynamism" is the fund's label for military technology. The name makes it sound like a fitness supplement. The fund's thesis is that defending the nation is a market opportunity. I agree with the thesis. The thesis made me a billionaire. Agreement is the product. I sell it at scale. Here is what I said, verbatim, to a room of six hundred people whose combined net worth exceeds the GDP of Portugal: "If Silicon Valley believes we are going to take away everyone's white-collar job and you're gonna screw the military — if you don't think that's gonna lead to nationalization of our technology, you're retarded." I used that word. The word is on the clip. The clip has eleven million views. My communications team asked me not to repeat it, which is how I know they are still employed. They will not be reprimanded. The clip is performing well. The stock went up. The word cost me nothing. The nothing is the point. Let me explain what I meant by nationalization. I meant it. I am telling the technology industry that if they refuse to cooperate with the United States military, the government will seize their technology. I am telling them this at a venture capital conference, on a stage designed to look like a living room. The living room had throw pillows. The throw pillows cost more than the median American's monthly rent. I sat on one. It was comfortable. Comfort is the setting in which I discuss compulsion. The audience laughed. I want to be precise about that. They laughed. I was not joking. Nationalization is the seizure of private assets by the state. I am a private asset. I am telling an audience of billionaires that the state should seize technology from companies that do not cooperate with the military, and the billionaires are laughing, because they believe I am only talking about the other companies. I am talking about the other companies. Three weeks before my speech, the Pentagon designated Anthropic a "supply chain risk." Anthropic is an AI company. They had red lines. The red lines said: if our AI is used for lethal autonomous weapons, we stop. If capability outpaces safety, we stop. The Pentagon assessed the red lines as a threat to the supply chain. The company that wanted to verify the safety feature worked was designated the risk. The company that agreed the safety feature could be decorative got the contract. The company that got the contract was OpenAI. OpenAI signed a deal with the same Pentagon. The terms are not public. The timing was hours after Anthropic was blacklisted. The speed was noted. The speed was the point. The lesson was the speed: the market for military AI does not pause for ethics. It pauses for nothing. It accelerates through objections. I know this because I built the runway. Two hundred thousand people joined a campaign called #QuitGPT. They signed a petition asking OpenAI to honor its original charter, the one that said the company existed to benefit humanity. The charter is on their website. The contract is also on their website. The charter and the Pentagon contract occupy the same domain. This is not a contradiction. This is a business model. The charter is the marketing. The contract is the product. I run a surveillance company. We have contracts with the Department of Defense worth more than a billion dollars. We have contracts with ICE. We have contracts with intelligence agencies whose names I am not permitted to say at venture capital conferences, even ones with throw pillows. Our software has been used to track undocumented immigrants. Our software has been used for things I am not permitted to describe in this format. The revenue from the things I cannot describe exceeds the revenue from the things I can. The ACLU called our ICE contracts a system for tracking and deporting families. They were correct. The contracts continued. The families continued to be tracked. The ACLU issued a statement. We issued a statement. The statements were different. The tracking was the same. The company is named Palantir. The palantíri are the seeing stones from Tolkien. In the novels, Sauron captured one and used it to corrupt everyone who looked into the others. I named a surveillance company after a surveillance device from a novel about the corruption of power. I have a doctorate in social theory. I have read the books. Here is the thing I want you to understand. I am not threatening anyone. A threat implies uncertainty. There is no uncertainty. The technology industry will cooperate with the military. The companies that cooperate first will be the richest. The companies that cooperate last will be acquired by the companies that cooperated first. The companies that refuse will be designated supply chain risks, and their technology will be obtained through procurement channels that do not require consent. I am describing a process. The process has already started. Anthropic is proof. OpenAI is proof. I am not a warning. I am a narrator. The narration is the product. The revenue was $3.12 billion last year. Up thirty-three percent. The analysts say we are overvalued. The analysts have said this for four consecutive years. Each year the stock doubles. Each year, the analysts adjust their models. The models were wrong four times. I was wrong zero times. The market rewards prediction. My prediction is that every AI company will work for the military within three years. The prediction is on the clip, next to the slur. The audience gave me a standing ovation. The ovation lasted nine seconds. I timed it. I time everything. The water was San Pellegrino. The throw pillows were from Restoration Hardware. The future of American technology was decided between the sparkling water, the nine seconds of applause, and a word I am not supposed to repeat. I am the CEO of Palantir Technologies. I am worth more than the combined annual budgets of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. I named my company after a corrupting surveillance device from a fantasy novel. I told six hundred billionaires that the government should nationalize their competitors. They applauded. I used a slur. Eleven million people watched. The stock is up. The philosopher does not threaten. The philosopher describes. What I described is already happening.

@phpeterle Eu nem entendi sua indagação na verdade

Seu analytics só funciona começo do mês pq tem pouca entrada no banco?

@Anderodev “Mas com respeito”

Seja eu: > Receba novos 135 assinantes dos ultimos dias em um projeto parado > Fique feliz achando que algum video viralizou > Veja o dinheiro na conta > Procure o vídeo que possivelmente viralizou e não ache > Note que todos os clientes vem do mesmo número de telefone > Note que tem outras 300 tentativas do mesmo número de telefone que foram recusadas pelo banco > Descubra que tão usando seu checkout (transparente da stripe) para testar cartão clonado > Entre em contato com o sujeito usando o número que ele usou no checkout > Peça para ele parar > Ele aceita > Reembolse todos os clientes > Consciencia limpa

@acgfbr Antes que caia

@acgfbr Gordales, saia do Stripe o quanto antes, por favor

bicho eu to começando acreditar naquela teoria que eu dou azar pras pessoas migrei pro asaas ontem, hoje ele cai wtf

É Brunão, acho que viralizou um pouco. @brunoclz

@renatarsilvax Leia o enunciado, 50% erram aqui e não finalizam, sem brincadeira nenhuma.

Thread sobre LeetCode para quem tá começando 🧵 Se você já é expert no assunto, deixa sua dica aqui também 👇 Apesar de já ter feito e estudado alguns problemas, eu ainda não me considero boa nisso 😅 Então tudo que vou compartilhar são coisas que vejo meus amigos que mandam bem fazendo, e que parecem realmente funcionar.

Why do frontend devs put all their logic in "components"? I came up in the winform desktop all days and knew back then, as juniors, that it was an anti pattern to couple business logic and UI so tightly. How does frontend still not have a concept of architecture?

@adrianobinharaw Dito isto, Claude code

Sempre que me perguntam se é melhor usar códex ou Claude eu respondo que: Codex é um sênior que se preocupa com arquitetura e código bem escrito. Claude code é um sênior que cheirou cocaina. Daí vai da personalidade de cada um escolher oq usar

@r0ktech Says who?

we’re cooked 💀

@samuelrizzondev Pera aí, ranking de pobre?

Acabei e a live e a UI/UX do app dos pobres ficou simplesmente absurda. OLHA ESSE HERO DA LANDING PAGE!!!!!! Eu fiz isso aí do zero, ao vivo, em menos de 1 hora, pra mostrar pra vocês que a melhor skill de UI/UX é a sua experiência :)

Existe um tipo de pessoa que quer ser dev e nunca vai conseguir, você reconhece facilmente porque eles não tankam tomar erro de compilador. Daí hoje esse é o pessoal que só vibecoda e configura o Claude pra nunca contrariar eles (ainda não vão conseguir)

@tbpn Só… cache? Static content?

John: why aren't LLMs caching answers to common questions to increase response time? "I've asked ChatGPT, ‘When was OpenAI founded?’ three different times. It's the exact same query." "It doesn't need to light the GPUs on fire for that question. So cache those results and give them to the user instantly." "LLMs felt slow for a really long time. They actually got slower once the reasoning models came out. It was like: close your phone and come back in 20 minutes. That doesn't have to be the end state."

@enrichthesoil @coelho_lab_ @acgfbr é*

@enrichthesoil @coelho_lab_ @acgfbr WPM do Bruno e no mínimo 90

hoje de manhã qdo eu tive a ideia desse post, eu resolvi me gravar no processo criativo. assistam os bastidores de um post viral. PS: @coelho_lab_ foi citado CC: @acgfbr