ᶜᵒʳᵉʸ

@Maz_Idriss Sorry if you’ve experienced some less than desirable interactions lately. Best to put yourself first!

The allegations against Russell Brand are difficult to process. Though I will not exclaim anyone’s innocence or guilt, I will say that I hope the social media response to allegations of this nature will change. There has been a lot of harmful, victim-blaming rhetoric.

@kat3mat3 These are photos from public events and professional photo shoots. Displaying one’s body in these situations doesn’t excuse a photo previously sent to an ex-IP privately being distributed by said ex-IP without consent on an international SM platform. It’s an invasion of privacy.

@xanonunknown If you say so, slightly. Although she's owned herself far worse in the past.

Though I do not support the Defendant in the context of #DeppVsHeard, seeing an ex-IP share a supposed intimate photo with sexual connotation on an SM site is incredibly bothersome. It is a massive invasion of privacy. If consent was not secured, that’s borderline revenge porn.

@kat3mat3 @lilmissaurora1 Hence why I noted borderline due to the sexual connotation/implication. And it is still an intimate photo that an ex-IP likely didn’t consent to having distributed on an international SM for bragging rights or to satisfy the curiosity of others. It’s in invasion of privacy.

@xanonunknown @lilmissaurora1 Not really sexual explicit, though, is it. More original Star Trek revealing and pound shop quality than Only Fans.

@kat3mat3 @lilmissaurora1 It is distributing sexually explicit images on the internet without the consent of the individual. Usually there is intent to intimidate or humiliate.

@xanonunknown @lilmissaurora1 So revenge porn doesn't have to be pornohraphic or revenge?

@MaddieWali Do not apologize. It’s extremely difficult to have in-depth, multifaceted conversations in this format. I appreciate your willingness to discuss.

@xanonunknown I can agree that it’s a violation of privacy at its core. If indeed, that photo was posted without her prior knowledge. We do not know the current & exact nature of their ties to one another. I’ll stop myself here. I apologise for writing so much.

@MaddieWali I appreciate you sharing your perspective as well.

@MaddieWali You’re entitled to yours too. However, it isn’t about the Defendant’s supporters & their choices to weaponize photos she took without consent. It’s about a billionaire sharing a supposed intimate photo without the ex-IPs consent on an international SM platform seemingly for fun.

@lilmissaurora1 I’d say if any discussions were had at all.

@xanonunknown I disagree but I guess its personal and depends on the discussions they had.

@lilmissaurora1 Perhaps it’s more so non-consensual intimate imagery distribution. Either way it’s wildly inappropriate and sets a harmful example (2/2).

@lilmissaurora1 Revenge porn doesn’t need to actually be about “revenge.” It is simple distributing sexually explicit images on the internet without the consent of the individual. As I stated, it seems borderline due to the sexual connotation (1/2)

@Maz_Idriss Of course!

He is a wealthy billionaire who owns this platform and leveraged it as a means to either brag about or embarrass an ex-IP. I do not want to lose sight of the moral disengagement we can all fall victim to because it involves the Defendant. This is incredibly harmful behavior.

I have not watched the #DeppVHeard documentary on Netflix. To be a bit blunt, I feel as though that would be a significant waste of my time. Have you watched it? What are your thoughts?

This is an example of how an individual with extremely valid, valuable, and applicable credentials, can perpetuate a falsehood pertaining to a psychological theory. This falsehood has become engrained in discourse pertaining to this theory and it is weaponized. That’s an issue.

•𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘋𝘈𝘙𝘝𝘖 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘯𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘭𝘺 𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘶𝘴𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘨𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘵. •𝘐𝘵 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘢𝘯 𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘰 𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘢 𝘋𝘈𝘙𝘝𝘖 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘰𝘧 𝘰𝘧 𝘨𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘵.

This is fundamentally incorrect. A DARVO response or the use of DARVO tactics (including accusations or denial, etc.) does not automatically equate to guilt (i.e. a confession). In fact, Dr. Freyd made this explicitly clear as a disclaimer pertaining to her theory of DARVO.

@MoonlitSails Thank you, and you!

@xanonunknown Hope you're well too! 💜

Hope you’re all well 🤍

The theory of DARVO presumes that the accused is the perpetrator. It presumes a perpetrator will utilize DARVO as a means to dodge accountability. The Duluth Model presumes the perpetrator’s gender is male based on its conceptual origins in feminist theory. See the problem?