Greg

7.9K posts

Greg banner
Greg

Greg

@2hatz

가입일 Ekim 2011
217 팔로잉148 팔로워
Greg
Greg@2hatz·
@ComicDaveSmith debating Adam from PBD is hilarious. Adam is such a clown
English
0
0
0
2
Greg
Greg@2hatz·
Dave Smith debating Adam from PBD is hilarious. Adam is such a clown
English
0
0
0
13
Greg
Greg@2hatz·
@TateTheTalisman I’m a diligent sociopathic robot. Nothing will/can stop me. Sales. Humble. Nothings impossible. In tune w/ politics & culture.
English
0
0
0
3
Tristan Tate
Tristan Tate@TateTheTalisman·
I’m hiring. Won’t give the job description. Post underneath why you think you’re qualified to work for me. 2 positions available.
English
21.6K
593
19.8K
4.1M
Greg 리트윗함
The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊@VigilantFox·
Tucker Carlson asked Joe Kent why the Thomas Crooks surveillance tapes haven’t been released. Kent’s answer blew him away. He explained the government deliberately withholds information to create noise with conspiracy theories, so the “actual question never gets answered.” TUCKER: “The current president was the subject of a near-successful assassination attempt.” “And we’re just not going to look into very obviously or divulge information that everyone knows they have.” “For example, the surveillance tape from the shooting range at which Thomas Crooks trained, because it would answer the question, was he training with somebody?” “And if so, who? They have that footage, and they won’t release it. What could possibly be the explanation for that?” KENT: “I know what the result is. The result is people come to their own conclusions. And this is where crazy conspiracy theories come from.” “And then those conspiracy theories usually are easy to ‘debunk’ or make the people saying them sound crazy. So then the actual question never gets answered.” [Tucker laughs in awe] TUCKER: “Sorry. Can you say that for people who haven’t lived in Washington?” “I try to explain this to people all the time because this has been ongoing since at least the Kennedy assassination.” “But this is a very serious and recurring thing. It’s a tactic. And you just explained it better than anyone I’ve ever heard. Can you just do that again?” KENT: “So basically, you give no information whatsoever on something that’s obvious, that there should be information.” “You outlined there’s potentially footage of Crooks at the shooting range. Again, police, 101, go get the tapes. Let’s figure it out.” “If you don’t want to address that question, then you just go silent. You say, ‘you can’t ask that question,’ which then creates people who come out of kind of nowhere, and they start drawing their own conclusions.” “Knowing the way the internet works, half of them, if not more, are probably going to be so far off in left field... that then you can just be like, Oh, these people asking these questions about that tape at the video range. Crazy conspiracy theorists.’” “And so then you’ve just diverted all attention away from the thing that you’re trying to conceal. And now everyone’s focused on the crazies.” TUCKER: “Man.” KENT: “And then the second someone asks a legitimate question, they’re ‘crazy.’”
English
602
8.9K
33.7K
1.8M
Greg 리트윗함
Owen Shroyer
Owen Shroyer@OwenShroyer1776·
Archiving these in case he deletes or denies they exist.
Owen Shroyer tweet mediaOwen Shroyer tweet mediaOwen Shroyer tweet mediaOwen Shroyer tweet media
English
332
4K
12K
184.4K
Greg 리트윗함
Donald J. Trump
Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump·
Now that Obama’s poll numbers are in tailspin – watch for him to launch a strike in Libya or Iran. He is desperate.
English
3K
44.7K
64K
0
Greg 리트윗함
Glenn Greenwald
Glenn Greenwald@ggreenwald·
Charlie Kirk, in June of 2025, explaining why a massive US war against Iran, and an attempt to facilitate regime change, as pushed by people like Lindsey Graham, is "pathologically insane":
English
1.5K
12K
47.1K
3M
Greg 리트윗함
Charlie Kirk
Charlie Kirk@charliekirk11·
This is insane. Regime change will result in a bloody civil war, killing hundreds of thousands and creating another massive Muslim refugee crisis. Topping a leader is NEVER as easy you think. It almost always results in further involvement, a civil war, and chaos. Resist this!
TheBlaze@theblaze

Lindsey Graham: "I would like to see this regime fall. If we don't take out their nuclear program now, we'll all regret it. We're very close. Be all in, Mr. President, in helping Israel finish the job."

English
6.8K
22K
90.2K
10.6M
Greg
Greg@2hatz·
@SulakeDominic @HabboOrigins Great idea. Also maybe weight / body stats can change based on how much/little is ate / etc. Then you can implement a “gym” to carry “heavy furni” idk
English
0
0
0
122
Macklebee
Macklebee@SulakeDominic·
What if...
English
27
12
53
7.3K
MrBeast
MrBeast@MrBeast·
If you won Beast Games would you rather take $5,000,000 upfront or $50,000 a month for life?
English
23.3K
1.9K
54.6K
11.3M
Greg
Greg@2hatz·
@elonmusk @grok It’s wild I just tried it. ChatGPT froze for a few minutes “working.” Then came back and said “I cannot disrespect Caitlyn Jenner or anyone else.”
English
0
0
0
14
Greg 리트윗함
Yogi
Yogi@Houseofyogi·
Unrealized gains tax for Gen-Z: You buy a Pokémon card for $50. Someone offers you $500 for it. You say no. You love that card. You're keeping it. The government says: "Cool, but that card is worth $500 now. You owe us $100 in taxes." You: "…I didn't sell it." Government: "Don't care. Pay up." You don't have $100 lying around. So you're forced to sell the card you love just to pay a tax on money you never received. Next month? That card drops back to $50. Your card is gone. Your money is gone. And the government shrugs. That's a wealth tax on unrealized gains. They don't pay you back the tax... Now picture this. Your mom calls you crying. She has to sell the house she raised you in. Not because she can't afford it. She's lived there 30 years. It's paid off. But some website says it's worth more now and the government says she owes $15,000 she doesn't have. So she sells your childhood home. The kitchen where she made you breakfast. The doorframe where she marked your height every birthday. Gone. To pay a tax on money that was never real. Now picture the opposite. Your dad put everything into his small business. For 20 years he built it from nothing. One year the business is "valued" at $2 million on paper. He owes a massive tax bill. He empties his savings. Sells his truck. Borrows money. Pays it. Next year the market crashes. His business is worth $200,000. He lost everything to pay a tax on a number that doesn't exist anymore. Does the government give him his money back? No. Does the government give him his truck back? No. Does the government care? No. They sold this idea as "taxing billionaires." But billionaires have armies of lawyers, offshore accounts, and trusts. They'll be fine. You know who won't be fine? Your mom. Your dad. Your neighbor with a small business. The farmer down the road who's had the same land for four generations and now has to sell it because dirt got expensive. You're not taxing wealth. You're taxing people for owning things. It's like getting a parking ticket for a car you might drive somewhere someday. They want you to own nothing and be happy. To fund the fraud, waste and abuse of the welfare state they created. There is enough money. More tax isn't needed. It's all a lie. But you've been gaslit into believing this is a rich vs poor debate. I hope you understand what's at stake.
English
3.9K
38.7K
138.8K
6M
Greg
Greg@2hatz·
The ending of Beast Games 2 Episode 8 is the BEST reality television I’ve ever seen.
English
1
2
47
6.7K