540

@0xG00gly Most likely its from the Cambodia guys arrest, the Prince Group

Tether just froze $182m USDT on Tron across 5 wallets, one of the largest blacklist I can remember. Expecting another DOJ press release thanking Tether soon, like for previous large cases. To put in context, this is higher than all USDC frozen to date. justice.gov/opa/pr/united-…

@whale_alert Just Tether and Twenty One Capital moving some funds

🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 43,033 #BTC (3,932,155,272 USD) transferred from unknown wallet to unknown wallet whale-alert.io/tx/bitcoin/b40…

@hoss_crypto It will be the most stable and consistent trade.

bitcoin will be the best trade of 2026

@coinfessions Atleast that's better than losing it all on the LUNA crash. From millions to $1 😥

My first bull run saw me $880,000 up at one point. I got into high yield defi and thought I was invincible. My crypto is now worth 25k.

@MartinShkreli Martin is back to doing big things

Hiring backend engineer $300k base, NYC only, Wall Street experience highly preferred DM or martin@dl.software

@Aark_Digital Will we see any movement on AARK this year 😐

@Crypto_Guerrila Aptos price has been falling nonstop, however I feel like within 6 months we will see very nice gains on Aptos. Aptos also is one of my favorites, I like how the USDT & USDC confirms nearly instantly on most exchanges. It should go up quite a bit, time will tell.

$APT - Aptos despite it's horrific price action remains within the descending broadening wedge. Few Key Points: 1. These wedges break upwards 70% of the time. 2. At the same time, RSI & Stoch RSI on the weekly timeframe have never been more oversold for Aptos. 2. Breaking up gives a target of $4. This gets us above S/R Flip 1 & 2. 3. It gets us back into the macro descending channel (orange lines) which was the original accumulation/distribution pattern ever since Aptos launched. 4. The Breakup Target of the Descending Channel is ~$40. 5. $40 is not the ultimate price potential of Aptos, it can go higher - ~$40 is just the target if this macro-pattern is re-entered and the last few weeks since 10/10 get chalked up to a fake-out on the macro timeframes. If the 30% chance scenario happens and the descending wedge breaks down; we are looking at a ~$1.18 Target for Aptos. This would be insane to see as this is below the cheapest price paid by Seed round investors at ~$1.48 per Aptos. These VC's would probably be fuming to see those prices - as they would have paid ~$1.48 per coin + have coins vesting + could have just bought Bitcoin without vesting and been multiples better off with the ability to sell whenever they wanted. That being said, ~$1.18 would give people better entries than seed investors got which would probably be a once in a life-time opportunity - if any of you have any Fiat left. I don't.

@zqinfo1 The absolute hardest is to get to $100,000 after you get over $100,000 everything else comes easy. The first $100,000 is the hardest and to keep it.

to make the first 5 million is brutal, the hardest thing you’ll ever have to do when you start from 0 -> 5m to 10m will feel like 7 figure hell. you’re comfortable but you’re not free, most people nuke here -> 10m to 25m is the easiest gainzy is a good example of 7 figure hell, bro streams everyday from a monthly pumpfun check because he is actually in hell

@WesterWolfgang Yes I’ve been researching this too a lot came from 50 BTC block rewards in 2010 & 2011 for some of the addresses the rest come from some other unidentified sources. Which leads back to the block rewards mining of ArtForz

Initial research information on the origin of the 80k wallet from 2011. The coins from 14YK4m… do not come from myBitcoin, but directly from a reward collection address (1ETcR4…) of a GPU miner. I will post the data on the rewards and account history online later.

@MMCrypto Wild

Thanks for the Gains XRP Army!

@WesterWolfgang The 10,000 BTC just moved 3 times in the last 30 minutes, currently sitting at bc1qmuxrzvnx34j8y6h9leg4zen5gnw7wmfmgp8v2p

@schmidt1024 All looks good besides your Notes both of those are not good for end to end encryption, you should use Notesnook or Standard Notes for best security practice, otherwise all looks good

My current Privacy Stack 📱 Google Pixel with GrapheneOS 🗣️ SimpleX, Signal, Session, Threema, Garnet (Nostr client) 🌐 Tor Browser, Vanadium, Brave 🛡️ InviZible Pro, Mullvad, IVPN, NymVPN ✉️ Webmail (self hosted), Tuta 🗒️ Nextcloud Notes, Joplin 📄 OSS Document Scanner 📁 Syncthing, Nextcloud, DAVx5, LocalSend 🔑 Keepass2Android (Nextcloud sync), Aegis, OpenKeychain 📦 F-Droid, Aurora Store (Anonymous), Obtainium 💸 Cake Wallet, Monerocom, Monerujo 🎥 Grayjay, NewPipe, VLC, AntennaPod 🗺️ CoMaps 🌤️ Breezy Weather ✅ Habits 📞 Koler ⌨️ FUTO Keyboard, Simple Keyboard 🎮 SUDOKU, Antimine 📲 PWAs whenever possible (e.g. x.com) 🚫 No Google apps, no Google account 🔄 Regular Updates for OS and apps --- * self hosted Nextcloud to sync ... calendar contacts Keepass Notes Joplin

@WesterWolfgang Interesting development, it may be very well from the myBitcoin hack, however I thought it was ArtForz and it was his exploit that he used in 2010 that was patched thereafter, I’ll have to take a more look into it. Nice find, I still think it’s ArtForz but maybe not

+++ There is new evidence that the 80k BTC wallets from 2011 could have originated from the myBitcoin hack and that ArtForz is a major victim and has lost many coins +++

@WesterWolfgang This is very interesting and concerning, only time will tell what’s the goal here but it looks very concerning. Did you compile your data about ArtForz yet?

+++ Three 2019 OP_RETURN spam wallets with around 14,000 BTC became active +++

@cz_binance Now after reading the findings, it would be nice to know if the other recent MultiSignature hacks were caused by malicious JS Code / AWS exposure. We would probably see more instances of this same behaviour if it was looked into. Including the Safe and Liminal multisig hacks

I usually try not to criticize other industry players, but I still do it once in a while. 😂 This update from Safe is not that great. It uses vague language to brush over the issues. I have more questions than answers after reading it. 1. What does "compromising a Safe {Wallet} developer machine" mean? How did they hack this particular machine? Was it social engineering, a virus, etc? 2. how did a developer machine have access to "an account operated by Bybit"? Some code got deployed from this developer machine straight to prod? 3. How did they fool the Ledger verification step at multiple signers? Was it blind signing? or did the signers not verify properly? 4. So, was $1.4 billion the largest address managed using Safe? How come they didn't target others? 5. What lessons can other "self-custody, multi-sig" wallet providers and users learn from this? 🤷‍♂️

@benbybit @sygnia_labs @Verichains Now after reading the findings, it would be nice to know if the other recent MultiSignature hacks were caused by malicious JS Code / AWS exposure. We would probably see more instances of this same behaviour if it was looked into. Including the Safe and Liminal multisig hacks

Bybit Hack Forensics Report As promised, here are the preliminary reports of the hack conducted by @sygnia_labs and @Verichains Screenshotted the conclusion and here is the link to the full report: docsend.com/view/s/rmdi832…

@DogecoinRide 2023 was #USDC easy 10% gain when it depegged

@WhaleChart Binance & Coinbase

@okx $FLOKI

👀 Which is your current top #altcoin $________ of your watchlist 📈?

@XRP_Moonshots XRP #1 👑

RETWEET If you are holding more than 1000 #XRP 🔥🔥🔥