Alexios Graham

@luvblessingz Usually, those kind of men have no good relations to their mother or any female close relatives.

Do men forget they have a mother when they rápe, abuse, mentally and emotional manipulate and kill women?

@Chszan_nsfw @DOCTOR_SEX6996 @MasterAutism0 @EarthAnd_TheSun Why do you have to sexualized it?

@DOCTOR_SEX6996 @MasterAutism0 @EarthAnd_TheSun Yea the parent being naked IS the weird part

People finding this weird never showered once with their parents

@PokemomPromoQ @MariaGraceVT Just who are you to speak for others? Think about this; if God constantly intervenes everytime we do any evil things, then what's the use of freedom?

@MariaGraceVT Don’t forget. You don’t care that god lets kids get raped everyday. Why give free will to people who WILL use it for evil? Why not give free will only to those who earned it maybe? Why are we given free will but have to earn eternal heaven? Why are we not earning the free will???

"If free will then why consequences?"

@FailsysFactorum @MariaGraceVT Why not?

@MariaGraceVT Freedom of choice does not mean freedom from consequences of those choices.

@PokemomPromoQ @MariaGraceVT Is the comment about seeing or not seeing the lights and switch?

@MariaGraceVT But we objectively can see the lights and the switch tho you retard. Your god is either fake, or really evil.

@PraetorPrimus Exaggeration.

@AlexiosGraham Jesus. Fucking. Christ. Put down your phone and pay attention in class. You are not a serious person.

Just say you are biased. Anyway, here's are links I found in the same video I watched: talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-noahs… drmsh.com/argue-biblical…

@PraetorPrimus Has been done already? Really?

@AlexiosGraham Which has been done already. Repeatedly. By dozens if not hundreds of trained scholars. And none of them support his hypotheses about the flood myth’s possible inaccurate vocabulary. None. He’s raising a point as if something is debated, but it’s not. There’s no debate. At all

@PraetorPrimus @sammograph @grok @MarvinDav313 @TheSkepticWiz You're forgetting to include that humans can be biased, so that statement is partially true.

@AlexiosGraham @sammograph @grok @MarvinDav313 @TheSkepticWiz This isn’t about the credentials. This is about the nature of what they do. Academics are committed to finding the truth. They have peer review & update the findings based on the evidence. Apologists start with the supposition your god exists & make things fit to prove that.

@PraetorPrimus He raises some valid points, though. Plain reading an ancient text won't really flesh out the author's intended message in each passages, so we should look closely on what influenced the text like the literary traditions of the time the texts were written.

@AlexiosGraham You were so close. I showed disdain for a content creator whose content I’ve watched many, many times and who has a track record of making incessant fallacies and claims which in almost all cases run counter to what trained academic professionals attest. His work is slop.

@PraetorPrimus @sammograph @grok @MarvinDav313 @TheSkepticWiz Shouldn't we instead focus whether those people raises some valid points instead of looking into their credentials?

@AlexiosGraham @sammograph @grok @MarvinDav313 @TheSkepticWiz The ones that work at universities and not apologist propaganda myth mills all attest that the plain reading language of the narrative of the flood myth reflects the scale and nature of the events as intended. You need to either demonstrate they are wrong or admit you are.

@PraetorPrimus It's biased because you showed prejudice just because the source is a Christian apologist despite having valid points and sources of his position and that kind of bias is problematic because it does not result to a meaningful discussion.

@AlexiosGraham How would that be biased? What is the nature and the driver of the bias? Is the bias good or bad and why? Don’t just throw around words. Show us that you know what they mean. Tell me more about my bias.

@PraetorPrimus @sammograph @grok @MarvinDav313 @TheSkepticWiz Ask the bible scholars about that if you want to know how.

@AlexiosGraham @sammograph @grok @MarvinDav313 @TheSkepticWiz Who determines the context? How do we know what is a clue and what is totally irrelevant to the primary topics meaning? Do you have the author’s notes about what they meant and how they meant it?

@PraetorPrimus If you refused to watch it because it's from a Christian apologist despite possessing valid points and based on research studies, then that would be biased.

@AlexiosGraham What. Is. My. Bias?

@PraetorPrimus @sammograph @grok @MarvinDav313 @TheSkepticWiz Context clues. Remember the dove released by Noah and going back while holding an olive branch?

@AlexiosGraham @sammograph @grok @MarvinDav313 @TheSkepticWiz How? How do we do this? How do you determine what is hyperbole and what is fully accurate? Not how do we guess - how we demonstrate with any reasonable level of confidence what anything means? Be specific.

@PraetorPrimus Oh good, I thought you are going to refuse to look into it just because it is made by a "laughable apologist."

@AlexiosGraham Yes. Answer my question. What is my bias?

@PraetorPrimus Have you looked into the video?

@AlexiosGraham Exactly what is my bias? Be direct and specific in the nature of bias and what precisely I’ve said that demonstrates that bias. Importantly, clarify if this bias is good or bad and why.

@PraetorPrimus @sammograph @grok @MarvinDav313 @TheSkepticWiz We have a way, but certainly not the pure plain reading way.

@AlexiosGraham @sammograph @grok @MarvinDav313 @TheSkepticWiz Then we have no way of knowing what anything in the Bible really means because of the semantic void you’re creating, and therefore we have no way of knowing what is true. Why build your entire existence around a book no one can demonstrate in even the smallest iota is true?

@sammograph @PraetorPrimus @grok @MarvinDav313 @TheSkepticWiz I say that the human author(s) was influenced by the Near East literary culture and traditions of that time.

@AlexiosGraham @PraetorPrimus @grok @MarvinDav313 @TheSkepticWiz So do you think the God deity inspiring the texts was just unaware of the size of the planet at that stage or just encouraged the exaggeration for dramatic flair?

@sammograph @PraetorPrimus @grok @MarvinDav313 @TheSkepticWiz Hebrew hyperbole is a valid factor, though. Besides, Near East literary culture is vastly different from modern literary culture so we should take that into account instead of relying on plain reading.

IP’s video pushes a regional flood via Hebrew hyperbole. But it’s not the consensus amongst qualified scholars and doesn’t overturn the text’s clear universal scope: ‘all flesh’ destroyed, waters over ‘all high mountains under all the heavens.’ The Hebrew accurately conveys total judgment as intended, not a local flood. Either way it’s problematic for the many reasons we’ve previously discussed.