Ancient Puzzles

A deep dive into modern & ancient DNA research, discussing the hypothetical lost advanced civilization of the Ice Age while scrutinizing the DeDunker and Graham Hancock. They both have some explaining to do — but I wouldn't hold my breath: #dna #atlantis youtu.be/WeTrInhgnCY

@FlintDibble @Filippobiondi_1 @ModernDayDebate if Dr. Dibble and Dr. Biondi agree, is it possible to discuss this findings (or lack of), as well as other claims on possible giant structures under the Giza Plateau on your channel? I thought that a neutral platform would be a better option.

I have invited @Filippobiondi_1 on my channel for a livestreamed frank conversation about his claims and methods. I do not think he will agree, but please share and reply to encourage him to address these points to the archaeological community

@adancingferret @DeDunkingPast Look Justine, Dan is back with another lie. Curious that instead of holding you accountable for what he says, he chooses to block you. The "man" claiming the moral high ground, the arbiter of truth...needs to hide behind his block!😂🤡

Yet none of them have me blocked because they can’t handle the truth 🤔 @DeDunkingPast

Successfully defend my dissertation. Have two weeks to make some edits and submit. Then it will be Dr. Lewis. Additionally, I'll be making a YT video over the summer discussing my dissertation research in more detail.

@adancingferret @farmer_tr @SoilManDan @DeDunkingPast Graham surely doesn't like how the DeDunker interacts on social media, and at the very least he has mixed feelings about the decision he made to save face after the debate. He will soon realise he shot himself in the foot, and Dan we'll see how his beloved guru ghosts him.

Several of us called it that Hancock was using him to attack archaeologists and would drop him once he outlived his usefulness. And yet again, Dan played along and got burned. He’s too toxic for Hancock to associate with now if he wants to maintain his nice guy image. And now Dan has to flail wildly at any chance at notoriety. Though he isn’t quite brave enough to take on an actual archaeologist in a debate. Sad, really.

@jtlewis_arch @DrHughT Congrats man 👍🏻🎉👍🏻

@DrHughT Haha, I passed. Have some edits to make and submit by May 6th

Dissertation defense set for April 23rd at 2PM. Hopefully shortly after that it will be Dr. Lewis.

Note how @Megalithic12000 provides no evidence for his claim. This is typical of his style of argument. It's also worth noting he uses AI to depict historical events which he claims took place but which in fact never happened. youtu.be/rbWMWIvsUoQ

@adancingferret @DeDunkingPast @Graham__Hancock A record of violence...what if there is evidence available on the internet? This is the kind of questions Graham Hancock should be asking before associating himself with certain individuals. x.com/i/status/20453…

@AncientPuzzles @DeDunkingPast @Graham__Hancock Graham has never been good at either accountability or admitting mistakes. And I’m sure he thinks he has plausible deniability about using and platforming someone with a record of violence and abhorrent behavior to fight his battles for him

It sure seems like @DeDunkingPast has lost the backing of the people using him as an attack dog like @Graham__Hancock It’s a shame he didn’t see what was so obvious

@billywarren007 @Gnosisinformant @DeDunkingPast @MBeallX He's busy ignoring why he deleted a vid with some "accurate information" (🤢🤮) but not the other one where he made some serious accusations / suggestions based on his epic fail.

@AncientPuzzles @Gnosisinformant @DeDunkingPast @MBeallX Wonder if Dan has figured out the difference between Saqqara and Abydos yet?😂

Imagine trying to understand a subject. “How the pyramids were built”, is a subject that most people justifiably don’t fully grasp. So you ask a few experts in Egyptology, archaeology, anthropology, historians, etc and get 5 different answers from 5 different areas of expertise and you are still confused. Would you then conclude that THEY, and every expert in the world on this subject for the past 200-300 years is wrong? And then go out and look for the most satisfying conclusion from some random amateur that makes sense TO YOU? Normal people with normal brains conclude that they don’t understand because THEY lack something in their understanding and need to study and read more about the subject. Pseudo-science & pseudo-history grifters might actually be the biggest narcissistic psychopaths on earth. “The answers I got from my professor makes no sense to me, so they must be an idiot because I’m obviously smart”. They assume that their own lack of understanding means that nobody else could possibly understand these things and therefore there is some sort of inherent bias and conspiracy to keep the REAL truth from being revealed.” People wonder why I am so harsh to these people and this is why. They suck and deserve to be treated as such.

@Gnosisinformant @DeDunkingPast @MBeallX Don't worry Dan, I wasn't planning to be in the comments. We'll see if you dare to call Neil or someone else a liar in that debate. The receipts are out there for everyone interested, so be careful, cause you're the one who can easily be exposed as a liar. Keep getting mad😌

@Gnosisinformant @DeDunkingPast @MBeallX For those interested, what Dan said was still accurate, wasn't accurate at all (surprise surprise!) youtu.be/WeTrInhgnCY?is…

@caritas_et @SoilManDan @DeDunkingPast @Megalithic12000 Also, let's not forget that in other occasions he pretended to have done his research, when in reality he simply read a few fragments of material. This is also a form of lying, and very typical of Dan btw. So poor research & dishonesty aren't mutually exclusive.

@caritas_et @SoilManDan @DeDunkingPast @Megalithic12000 He does very poor research, so in some cases it's really not possible to know for sure. I agree that what you mention is a possibility, however, it doesn't change the fact that he's been caught lying multiple times. It's difficult to give him the benefit of the doubt tbh.

This is the third in a series of videos exposing @Megalithic12000's fake Incan history. This video critiques his claim that the Incans did not have the engineering skills to build the megalithic structures. youtu.be/3xzXbxYXoao

@SoilManDan @caritas_et @DeDunkingPast @Megalithic12000 Dan lies over and over, forgets what he's lied about, and then gets mad when someone shows the receipts.

@caritas_et @DeDunkingPast @Megalithic12000 This was really embarrassing for @DeDunkingPast, and it’s just one of dozens of sources he lies repeatedly about.

The fact that he has considered debating a low profile who apparently raped a woman, also reveals how desperate he is.

I have no sympathy for Archaix. However, the DeDunker is exposing himself once again by showing his double standards: he demands an apology to debate now, but doesn't act the same way with prof dave & Flint...knowing he has accused both of "lying about him"!!! Yes, he's a coward.