Nonhlanhla M๐ฉ๐ฝโโ๏ธโ๏ธ
2.5K posts

Nonhlanhla M๐ฉ๐ฝโโ๏ธโ๏ธ
@Attorney_Bae
All things law on X: @TheLegalAffair โข #MG200Young ๐ฟ๐ฆโ21 โข Attorney โข Legal Analyst โข Hodophile โข New Project @NNotesAndBooks



you guys have any plans for the long weekend? ๐ญ

Anyone have any good or bad experiences worth sharing about buying a certified pre-owned iPhone?


The Supreme Court of Appeal has ruled that the RAF1 form is unlawful and set it aside. This means well over 200k claimants who were wrongly turned away will now have their claims properly considered in line with the RAF Act.

LAW FIRMS CHALLENGE BEE CODE South Africaโs largest law firms (Webber Wentzel, Bowmans and Werksmans) are set to challenge the B-BBEE Legal Sector Code in the Gauteng High Court next month. They argue that the requirement to double Black ownership to 50% within five years is impractical and unlawful. The firms say the code unfairly targets a small group, as most smaller practices are exempt. They also warn that their BEE ratings could drop from Level 1 to Level 6 or lower, putting government work, which accounts for up to 20% of revenue, at risk. Judgment is expected by late June. Pictured - Ezra Davids, Bowmans Senior Partner Link in bio for more

[WATCH] The Industrial Development Corporation is under pressure following fresh claims that it may have bent its own rules on a multi-billion rand project.ย A report by the Mail & Guardian alleges that a controversial consortium was pushed through to benefit from the deal, raising new questions about governance at the state funder.ย @NtoksKhumalo reports. #Newzroom405

@hlovo_ Immigrants often take the jobs local citizens are not willing to do and see opportunities in the rubble. This is not just an SA phenomena. In addition, the ANC is looting the country in partnership with WMC and I donโt see anyone fighting them ๐ญ

Mugabeโs son paid the R600k fine instantly ๐ญ๐ญโ๐พ Judges are part of our problems in this country ๐ญโ๐พ

Unemployment has so many externalities. One being that thereโs a critical number of adults who can be mobilised for anything in SA.



How can we regulate Ai when we are using American and Chinese Ai platforms? These Apps are in the cloud and like Watsup they are not domiciled in SA. Do we regulate X, Facebook or instagram? I Need to be educated on how Ai regulation would work.

๐จBREAKING: Anthropic just published a study mapping exactly which jobs its own AI is replacing right now. The workers most at risk are not who anyone expected. They are older. They are more educated. They earn 47% more than average. And they are nearly four times more likely to hold a graduate degree than the workers AI is not touching. The argument is straightforward. Anthropic built a new metric called "observed exposure." Not what AI could theoretically do. What it is actually doing right now in professional settings, measured against millions of real Claude conversations from enterprise users. For computer and math workers, AI is theoretically capable of handling 94% of their tasks. It is currently handling 33% of them. For office and administrative roles, theoretical capability is 90%. Current observed usage is 40%. The gap between what AI can do and what it is already doing is enormous. The researchers are explicit about what comes next. As capabilities improve and adoption deepens, the red area grows to fill the blue. The demographic finding is what makes the paper uncomfortable. The most AI-exposed workers earn 47% more on average than the least exposed group. They are more likely to be female. They are more likely to be college educated. This is not a story about warehouse workers or truck drivers. It is a story about lawyers, financial analysts, market researchers, and software developers. The exact group whose education was supposed to insulate them. Computer programmers showed the highest observed AI exposure at 74.5%. Customer service representatives at 70.1%. Data entry keyers at 67.1%. Medical record specialists at 66.7%. Market research analysts and marketing specialists at 64.8%. These are not predictions. These are measurements of work that is already happening on AI platforms right now. Then there is the pipeline finding nobody is talking about loudly enough. Anthropic's researchers found a 14% decline in the job-finding rate for workers aged 22 to 25 in highly exposed occupations since ChatGPT launched. No comparable effect for workers over 25. Entry-level roles were never just jobs. They were the training ground where junior analysts became senior analysts, where junior lawyers learned how arguments hold together. If that layer disappears, nobody has answered the question of where the next generation of senior professionals comes from. The detail buried in the paper that most coverage missed: 30% of American workers have zero AI exposure at all. Cooks. Mechanics. Bartenders. Dishwashers. The technology reshaping professional careers is completely irrelevant to roughly a third of the workforce. The divide is no longer between high skill and low skill. It is between presence and absence. The company publishing this study is the same company selling the AI doing the replacing. Anthropic had every commercial incentive to soften these findings. They published them anyway. If you spent four years and $200,000 on a degree to land a white collar career, the company that builds Claude just confirmed your job is more exposed than the bartender pouring drinks at your graduation party. Source: Anthropic, "Labor market impacts of AI: A new measure and early evidence" PDF: anthropic.com/research/laborโฆ

Desmond Tutu kinda was forcing black people to forgive, I donโt like that

Until we get a legal system that is willing and able to prosecute corrupt politicians, we will never get anywhere

Especially at work



Imagine buying a property at the Blyde Riverwalk Estate thinking youโll be able to earn extra income from Air BnB and the property will basically payoff its own loan then the Estate management dies a complete 360 on you, now you are stuck with a bond you canโt afford to pay.

















