منصور اليافعي

اللهم عليك بكل من أراد بهذا البلد وأهله شرًا … اللهم اشغلهم بأنفسهم واجعل كيدهم في نحورهم … إنك على كل شيء قدير

Germany, Japan, South Korea, Qatar, Turkey, and dozens of other countries host US bases. Are they all “parties to war” that deserve to be bombed? By your logic, half the planet is a legitimate target. That’s not international law, that’s the logic of a terrorist state looking for excuses. And hosting a radar doesn’t make civilians in airports and cities fair game. Nothing does.

@Buzayed0 @GerardAraud Iran dragged this war to the gulf countries? Idiot, you host American bases and assets (radars) used in the aggression against Iran. You are automatically a party of the war against Iran .. even under international law.

Strange. It means deepening your dependence on a country that has led yours into a disastrous conflict without caring about your interests.

The UAE was established in 1971. The Islamic Republic of Iran? 1979. Eight years younger. Singapore (1965), South Korea (1948), Estonia (1991) all prove that a nation’s age says nothing about its legitimacy or success. In 55 years, the UAE built a global economy, world-class infrastructure, and a home for 200+ nationalities. In 47 years, Iran’s regime delivered sanctions, isolation, and a collapsing currency. A country is measured by what it builds, not when it was born. What’s truly “risible” is mocking a nation’s age while championing a younger regime that has achieved nothing but misery for its own people.

@Buzayed0 @Sara84916943 @GerardAraud The UAE isn't even an actual country. How can some entity established only in the early 1970s act like this? It's so risible.

Thank you. The real problem is this: some see the Gulf’s restraint as weakness, and others see it defending its own skies and people as “loving Israel.” The game is simple: comply with their narrative or be labeled. But intercepting missiles aimed at your cities isn’t a political statement, it’s a sovereign duty. If Iran has a problem with Israel, it should solve it directly. The Gulf is not a battlefield for someone else’s war. You don’t get to fire missiles at our cities and then demand we thank you for it.

@Buzayed0 @GerardAraud Very well said. Also, Gulf countries depth of field on this is unmatched

This is a popular talking point, but it collapses under the weight of actual facts. “Whichever side you choose you’re screwed” The UAE didn’t “choose a side.” It was bombed by Iran while being neutral. It gave Tehran explicit guarantees, maintained diplomatic ties, and invested years in de-escalation. Iran chose to bomb it anyway. When someone attacks your airports and kills your residents, defending yourself isn’t “choosing a side” it’s the only option left. The Iran-Iraq comparison Iran and Iraq were both active belligerents who invaded each other. The GCC states are non-combatants who were attacked unprovoked. These are fundamentally different situations. Comparing the two is like comparing someone who starts a bar fight with someone who gets punched while walking home. “Being America’s friend is more dangerous than being its enemy” Let’s test that theory. Japan, South Korea, Germany, Singapore all close US partners, all thriving, stable, prosperous nations. Now look at those who chose hostility: Saddam’s Iraq, Gaddafi’s Libya, Assad’s Syria, and now Iran under the IRGC. Which list would you rather be on? The GCC states aren’t naive. They don’t put all their eggs in one basket. The UAE has strategic partnerships with the US, Europe, China, India, and Russia simultaneously. That’s not dependency that’s called smart diplomacy. The real lesson here isn’t “don’t have allies.” It’s “don’t bomb your neighbors and expect them to stay neutral.”

@Buzayed0 @GerardAraud Which ever side you choose you are screwed and the GCC knows it. That's what happened to Iran when facing Iraq and what happened to Iraq well as you all know being America's friend is more dangerous than being an enemy they say.

First, let me be absolutely clear about something: Nobody here wishes any harm on the Iranian people. Not the Gulf states, not their governments, and certainly not me. The Iranian people are our neighbors, our cousins, and for centuries we have shared history, trade, culture, and faith. We have zero desire to see them suffer not from sanctions, not from war, and certainly not from nuclear weapons. Let that be unambiguous. But there is a fundamental difference between the Iranian people and the Iranian regime. It is the IRGC not the Iranian people that launched thousands of missiles and drones at Gulf cities, airports, and civilian infrastructure. It is the regime not the people that has spent decades funding militias, destabilizing the region, and threatening its neighbors. Our issue has never been with Iran as a nation. It is with a regime that holds its own people hostage and then attacks ours. Now, to your specific points: 1. “USA and Israel want to nuke Iran.” This is fearmongering, not an argument. The Gulf states have consistently called for diplomacy and de-escalation. We are the ones who would suffer the most from any nuclear conflict in the region the fallout, the refugees, the economic collapse would hit us first. So the suggestion that we are somehow cheering for a nuclear strike on our own doorstep is not just wrong, it’s absurd. No one in the Gulf wants a war with Iran we want a regime that stops attacking us. 2. “What happens when you have strong ties with the US and Iran is nuked?” Having security partnerships does not mean endorsing every possible action a partner might take. France has strong ties with the US does that make France responsible for every American military decision? Germany hosts US bases does that mean Germany supports nuking anyone? This logic is deeply flawed. The Gulf states maintain partnerships with Washington for defense to protect their skies and their people from the very missiles that Iran already fired at them. That is not a blank check for anything else. 3. “The IRGC said they will respond with whatever they are hit with.” So your argument is essentially: Iran might have nuclear weapons, and the IRGC threatens to use them, therefore the Gulf states should submit to Iran’s demands out of fear? That is not diplomacy that is nuclear blackmail. And it is precisely the reason why the Gulf states need strong defense partnerships. You are literally making the case for why these alliances are necessary while trying to argue against them. The Gulf states want peace. They want stability. They want prosperity for the entire region including Iran. But they will not be bullied, threatened, or blackmailed into abandoning their right to self-defense. If Iran wants the Gulf to de-escalate its partnerships, the answer is simple: stop firing missiles at us.

@Buzayed0 @GerardAraud Do you understand that USA and Israel want to nuke Iran, but they are still looking for justification? What happens when you have strong ties with US and Iran is Nuked? They IRCG mentioned that they will respond with whatever they are hit with, and we don't know if the have nukes

Let’s unpack your claims one by one, 1. “Iran has a right to defend itself.” Defend itself from whom exactly? The Gulf states? The countries that spent years rebuilding diplomatic ties with Tehran, exchanged ambassadors, expanded trade, and publicly stated repeatedly that their territories would not be used for any military operations against Iran? Iran didn’t “defend itself.” It launched an indiscriminate barrage of missiles and drones against six Arab countries most of which had zero involvement in any conflict with Iran. That’s not self-defense. That’s aggression against neutral states. There is a word for that in international law: it’s called a war crime. 2. “You allow Israel-US to use your bases and territory.” This is Iranian regime propaganda, and repeating it doesn’t make it true. The Gulf states explicitly and publicly denied any use of their territories for operations against Iran. But let’s say, hypothetically, that a country did host foreign military assets does that give Iran the right to bomb civilian airports, oil refineries, and cities full of millions of civilians? By your logic, every country hosting a foreign base on earth is a legitimate target for mass bombardment. Do you realize how insane that sounds? 3. “You will get much more of what you deserve.” So you’re openly celebrating and threatening violence against entire civilian populations. You’re not making a political argument you’re issuing a threat. This is exactly the mentality that makes Iran a pariah state. And it’s exactly why the Gulf states are strengthening their defenses. You are proving Dr. Gargash’s point better than he ever could. 4. “Stop aiding the illegal war.” Which illegal war? The one where Iran without any UN mandate, without any legal justification, without even a declaration of war fired thousands of missiles at sovereign nations that were not at war with it? The Gulf states are not party to any war against Iran. Iran chose to make them targets. The aggressor does not get to lecture the victims on legality. Here’s the bottom line: No country on earth is obligated to accept being bombed and then quietly comply with the bomber’s demands. That is not diplomacy that is extortion. And no amount of propaganda will turn the aggressor into the victim.

@Buzayed0 @GerardAraud Iran has a right to defend itself - you allow Israel-US to use your bases and territory to attack Iran illegally. You will get much more of what you deserve. Stop aiding the illegal war, stop usage of your land and air spaces. Period.

Let’s be clear my criticism is directed at the Iranian regime and its actions, not at the Iranian people. The Iranian people have a rich history, a great civilization, and a deep legacy in science, art, and culture. They deserve respect. But there is a clear difference between respecting a people and holding a political system accountable for its actions. In the UAE, one of the largest Iranian communities outside Iran lives and works in peace reflecting strong human and social ties. This makes it even clearer that the issue here is not about people, but about policies. If your problem is with the United States or Israel, then deal with them directly. Targeting Gulf states, threatening their cities, and attacking their infrastructure is not “resistance” it is escalation against countries that are not your battlefield. Dragging others into conflicts that don’t belong to them doesn’t make you stronger it only exposes the problem. 👍🏻

@Buzayed0 @GerardAraud Save your lectures for your children. You are royally cooked and the Iran you are disrespecting will teach you the best lesson because you are as arrogant as your Zionist masters

@Aviator2013 @GerardAraud Sovereign states make strategic decisions based on interests, not street talk.

@Buzayed0 @GerardAraud Well heard on the street ! Trump wants $ 28 billion to stop the war ! & 3 trillion to continue the war from Gulf states 🤣sadly these Camel jockeys 🏇 still think the Washington Goy are their true friends it’s all abt money which these micropenis size countries don’t understand

@badboy_mickee @GerardAraud The only one saying UAE territory was used is Iran and the UAE has officially rejected it. No U.S. confirmation. No verified evidence. What is confirmed? Iran threatening and attacking the UAE with missiles and drones. That tells you everything.

@Buzayed0 @GerardAraud UAE territory was used to attack Iran, stupid. Even the US wasn’t shy about it

@DrogoEth @GerardAraud You’re calling it “terrorism.” The international community calls it a peace framework to end the war. That difference says everything.

@Buzayed0 @GerardAraud UAE, backing terrorist proxies in Sudan and enabling genocide is also a terrorist regime!

“Out of curiosity”? Let’s answer with facts, not selective memory. Before any recent escalation: • Iran has occupied UAE islands since 1971 and still refuses a resolution under international law. • Iran-backed militias launched drone and missile attacks on Abu Dhabi, killing civilians in 2022. • Iran repeatedly threatened Gulf shipping and the Strait of Hormuz — a lifeline for global energy. Beyond the UAE: • In Yemen, Iran armed and enabled militias that launched missiles and drones at Gulf cities. • In Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon, it built and supported armed groups that destabilized states and undermined sovereignty. • In Bahrain and across the Gulf, it backed networks aimed at internal disruption and unrest. And today? • Hundreds of missiles and over a thousand drones have been launched toward the UAE, targeting cities and infrastructure. So the real question isn’t “how did Iran threaten you?” It’s: how much evidence do you need before you stop pretending it didn’t?

@Buzayed0 @GerardAraud Just out of curiosity.. before the US/Israel aggression, how did Iran threaten you? What did they actually do?

@talesnall @GerardAraud If the UAE were “bombing Iran every day,” you’d have evidence not slogans. What we do have evidence of is Iran firing hundreds of missiles at civilian areas in the UAE. That’s not hypocrisy that’s aggression.

@Buzayed0 @GerardAraud Hundreds of words and none of them says the simple truth: UAE territory is used to bomb Iran every day. Stratospheric hypocrisy

از تروریسم سخن می‌گویی و آن را محکوم می‌کنی… در حالی که موشک‌هایت بر آسمان کشورهای خلیج فارس و کشورهای عربی فرو می‌ریزد؟ از “متجاوزان” دَم می‌زنی و آنان را سرزنش می‌کنی… در حالی که پهپادهایت حریم امن مردمان بی‌گناه را می‌شکنند و دارایی‌ها و منابع آنان را هدف قرار می‌دهند؟ تویی که آتش خود را به سوی مناطق مسکونی امن نشانه رفتی. تویی که تلاش کردی بنادر و فرودگاه‌ها را بزنی. تویی که تأسیسات انرژی و میدان‌های نفت و گاز را هدف قرار دادی. تویی که موشک‌های بالستیک خود را بر نیروگاه‌های برق و زیرساخت‌ها شلیک کردی. تویی که تهدید کردی هر کشتی‌ای را که از آبراه‌های بین‌المللی عبور کند به آتش خواهی کشید. تویی که میان تأسیسات نظامی و هتلی که پناهگاه غیرنظامیان است تفاوتی قائل نشدی. و سپس بر فراز تریبون‌ها می‌روی… تا به جهانیان درس “صلح” بدهی؟ اما بدان: پدافندهای کشورهای خلیج فارس و کشورهای عربی در برابر تجاوز تو ایستادند، پهپادهایت را رهگیری کردند، هواپیمایت را سرنگون ساختند، و ثابت کردند که دست تو کوتاه‌تر از آن است که به عزم و اراده‌ی آنان برسد. آن که موشک صادر می‌کند، حق ندارد موعظه صادر کند. پرونده باز است، شواهد پاک‌شدنی نیستند… و تمام جهان جلاد را می‌بیند آنگاه که نقاب قربانی بر چهره می‌زند.

توهم حذف ایران از نقشه، نشان‌دهنده استیصال و درماندگی در مقابل اراده یک ملت تاریخ‌ساز است. تهدید و ترور مردم ایران را منسجم‌تر می‌کند. تنگه هرمز برای کشتی‌های همه کشورها به جز متجاوزین به خاک ایران باز است. پاسخ پریشان گویی و تهدیدهای بی‌محابا را قاطعانه در میدان می‌دهیم.

أنت رئيس مجلس شورى نظام ارهابي يخوض حربا وجودية قبل أن يتم حذفه من الوجود … ومع ذلك تجد الوقت لتهديد دول الخليج بسبب استثماراتها السيادية … هل تعتقد حقا أن ابتزاز جيرانك بورقة (سندات الخزانة) سيحميك؟ … طبعا لا نستغرب مثل هذي التغريدات من نظام ارهابي. حين تصف استثمارات دول الخليج بأنها (ملوثة بالدماء) وتهدد مقارها وأصولها فأنت لا تمارس الردع بل تمارس البلطجة السياسية … دول الخليج تدير محافظها الاستثمارية وفق مصالحها الوطنية وقواعد الاقتصاد العالمي … ولن تقبل أن ترهن قراراتها السيادية لخطابات ميليشياوية تبحث عن انتصارات وهمية على حساب استقرار المنطقة. نظامك الارهابي أطلق آلاف الصواريخ والمسيرات على ست دول خليجية مجاورة لم تشن عليكم حربا … فقتل مدنيين واستهدف مطارات ومنشآت طاقة … فبأي منطق يأتي من قصف جيرانه بثمانية أضعاف ما أطلقه على عدوه المعلن … ليحاضرنا اليوم عن المظلومية و (الأهداف المشروعة). أما زعمك بأنكم (تراقبون المحافظ الاستثمارية) … لدول الخليج … فهو يثير السخرية لا الرعب … نظام لم يستطع حماية قادته في عقر داره ولا منع اختراق منظومته الدفاعية ولا حتى الحفاظ على تماسك قراره بين رئيس يعتذر وحرس ثوري يكذبه … يزعم اليوم مراقبة محافظ سيادية؟ … هذا ليس ردعا هذا عجز يتنكر في ثوب القوة. التهديدات العشوائية لدول الجوار تصنع عزلة لا نفوذا … والفارق بين رجل الدولة والمتحدث الميليشياوي أن الاول يعرف متى يصمت بينما الثاني يظن أن كل تغريدة معركة … ليثبت فقط أن القرار الاستراتيجي لم يعد في يد من يفهمه.

حضور سموه .. و تأهل للنهائي العيد بكم يا سيدي اكتمل وأجمل الحمد لله على نعمه وفضله 🤍

مزاجنا اليوم غير 🕺🤍🖤 #نادي_الجزيرة #كأس_رئيس_الدولة

الحلم مستمر .. إلى النهائي 🔥 #نادي_الجزيرة #كأس_رئيس_الدولة

رجال في الملعب قاتلوا حتى آخر نفس … وجماهير كانت النبض والسند … هكذا تصنع الانتصارات … وهكذا يكتب التاريخ هذا الفوز ليس مجرد نتيجة … هذا حب وانتماء وهوية هذا #فخر_ابوظبي ابارك لعشاق الفخر دمتم ذخر وفخر