CeeCee

Buhari's tenure will end in less that 20-24 months constitutionally. But let us mark these names; * Garba Shehu * Femi Adesina * Tolu Ogunlesi * Bashir Ahmad * Rauf Aregbesola * Lauretta Onochie * Prof Yemi Osinbajo * Ahmed Lawan * Femi Gbejabiamila * Adamu Garba Just mark them

@SAMKLEF @PeterObi You don’t even hv sense. I knw tot didn’t even read what he said

Abacha instructed me to till kudirat abiola! Today @PeterObi is celebrating the same man. Blood 🩸

Thank God people like Bola Ahmed Tinubu and Muhammadu Buhari became president. History will have pinned Muhammadu Buhari down as the president Nigeria never had who would have changed the country, and Bola Ahmed Tinubu as one of the greatest democrats to ever live.

@akintollgate You’re embarrassing yourself really, with your big beards you sound so empty

The day news of General Sani Abacha’s death broke, the entire country jubilated. Beyond his death in 1998, 🇳🇬 emerged from its dystopian era. The fear of mentioning his name in an Elelenwo beer parlor in port harcourt was a conscious feeling. Do your politics, but be sincere.🙏🏾

@FolushoxFolarin Coming from And idiot

Because of this nonsense Peter Obi said, I am going to do an extensive thread on Abacha tonight. Anyone who describes Abacha as democratic is a mad man.

@ShehuSani They’ve removed your brain

You want to report INEC to Trump who is reportedly thinking of running for third term for himself.The same person who ignored the elections in Uganda and Tanzania.I don’t think we are among his top 50 priorities for now.Better you report to CAF.

Na NADECO member withhold 132B osun state LGA allocation, in blatant disregard of court order.

Like Peter Obi said, when the history books are written, Abacha will be remembered as seemingly more democratic and more respectful of human rights than Bola Tinubu. The so-called champion of activism.

@Benking443 @guzu_p @_BarnyO @_Nsznn @abazwhyllzz @Wizarab10 @0moyeh @attah_akor @MrMekzy_ @neo_officialll Where did they all come out from bcos I’ll take on them one after the other

This woman was punching and assaulting a man. Nobody budged. Nobody tried to stop her. But the moment the man fought back, other men—weak and foolish—swarmed him. Men are the biggest enablers of women who are unaccountable.

Abacha was a better democrat than Tinubu! Abacha hired people from every part of the country. Under Abacha, the country was under heavy sanction yet the economy was doing way better under Tinubu. Under Abacha the killings were only among few elites. Under Tinubu there are uncountable number of killings both elite and ordinary people. Under Abacha, NADECO made a lot of noise, won elections. Under Tinubu, opposition has been stifled, and one party system is now being encouraged. National anthem no longer matters as On your mandate has completely replaced it. Tinubu is a bigger calamity than Abacha.

Igbos have been roasting Chief Priest for couple of days nonstop now, let me not here one animal later saying that “Igbos don’t drag their own when they join the APC or declare support for Tinubu.” Let’s be guided!

Look at Mr “I did not resign”

Another evidence to show that Bala Nafiu resigned from the ADC. This report was in August 2025. Newscentral can not set up her cameras, invite guest to discuss something that never happened.

@OyesileJohn You’re an imbecile or an intending one

To my South Southern brothers and sisters, Obi said Sani Abacha who k*lied and dissolved the body your brother, Ken Saro Wiwa, in acid is better than every man and woman who fought for democracy to making sure that Ken got justice. To my South Western brothers and sisters, Peter Obi said Sani Abacha who kept MKO, a beacon of democracy, incarcerated and wiped off his wife and other associates from the surface of the earth is better than every man and woman who risked their lives to making sure democracy was restored. To my Norther brothers and sisters, remembered OBJ gave account of how Sani Abacha injected Ya'Adua with virus that inventually killed him? Well, Peter Obi said the same Abacha is better than every son and daughter from the north who made sure democracy was restored. Make of this what you want. One thing is certain, a mam so desperately vile as @PeterObi will never be found in the position to make decisions on Nigerians' behalf. The democracy he has insulted will never favour him. These are not curses, they are natural consequences of gutter behaviour.

@fkeyamo Foolish take

The David Mark’s faction of the ADC really think they can use emotional reasoning and blackmail to bluff their way out of a purely legal conundrum they brought upon themselves. Unfortunately for them, law does not admit of sentiment. Decisions are based on facts, evidence, and the interpretation of laws, rather than on sympathy, emotion or political considerations. All those who are arguing about ‘status quo ante bellum’ are dispensing their time and energy chasing shadows and not the substance. This is because whether INEC recognises either faction for now is irrelevant: what is relevant is that there is a challenge regarding the take-over of the Party pending in court by a duly elected Deputy National Chairman. As long as that case remains in court, all the actions of either faction MAY end up being nugatory AFTER the deadline for nominations of candidates by INEC. The implication is that the ADC may end up having NO CANDIDATE for the election. Therefore, instead of vilifying INEC, the ADC should rather thank INEC for this timely action of de-recognising both factions BEFORE the close of the window for nominating candidates. It has duly forewarned the Party of the danger ahead and opened a window for them to either find a new, risk-free platform or ask for accelerated hearing of the case in court, or politically settle the leadership question in the Party quickly. To keep blaming imaginary opponents or INEC is purely mischievous: neither APC nor INEC prodded these grown adults and supposedly ‘experienced’ politicians to go and hijack an existing platform without sound legal advice and without properly sorting out every member of the leadership of that existing platform. They say they will proceed with their congresses and Convention despite INEC’s decision and the ruling of the Court of Appeal. That is fine by us. NEVER INTERRUPT YOUR OPPONENT WHEN HE IS MAKING A MISTAKE.

They focus more on who’s not the President and left the person who’s actually be President. Peter Obi will never be President, so what’s the person who’s actually the President doing to fix the country? Isn’t that some kind of mental disorder?

They focus more on who’s not the President and left the person who’s actually be President. Peter Obi will never be President, so what’s the person who’s actually the President doing to fix the country? Isn’t that some kind of mental disorder?

I just finished watching INEC chairman interview on Arise, he said he just followed court order regarding the recognition of ADC leadership , which state everything should go status quo ante bellum, which meany going back to status before war. And he said he went back to 2nd September which was the day the war began. Now the question is who was chairman before 2nd September? David Mark was Appointed ADC chairman by the ADC NEC on 2nd July which means the status quo ante bellum chairman is David Mark. Everything points to a biased Amupitan.

Peter Obi NADECO tweet is giving APC sleepless night, now they are trying to make it a tribal thing, TINUBU does not represent we the Yorubas, we will not buy the rhetoric. A self aclaim fighter of democracy is the same trying to kill democracy... make it make sense.

@lover_of_Wizkid @Imranmuhdz Why are you jumping the state of things before September 2025!!!

Professor Amupitan is right to stand his ground. The term 'status quo ante bellum' simply means returning to the state before the legal 'war' began in September 2025. Calling for the sack of an INEC Chairman for obeying a Court of Appeal order shows a lack of understanding of judicial processes. The ADC should focus on their internal legal battles instead of attacking the umpire.

“If they (ADC) are saying we have taken sides, that is not true, because if you look at the status quo ante bellum, we tried to interrogate it, and it means the status before the hostility started, the status before the war.” - Prof. Amupitan INEC Chairman responded to David Mark-led ADC calling for his sack over INEC's derecognition of their NWC.

@VeshSa @RealHeraclides @Imranmuhdz You took time to explain to a fool. He won’t respond bcos thy are built for chaos. That’s why he doesn’t want to hear the simplest of truth as regards this issue.

I checked to be sure you’re a lawyer , BUT there’s not the faintest indication you’re one — or well educated. Let me, however, volunteer few lines for you . 1. First, in law, that “order” from the Court of Appeal WAS NOT an injunction. Even Prof NEVER said INEC was directed by the Court of Appeal TO DO ANYTHING! Okay? 2. Do you know why the Court of Appeal did not issue any injunction? The answer: the Court of Appeal had already ordered what is called ACCELERATED HEARING . Where a court is presented with a request for injunction ( these are equitable remedies), the court may decide, INSTEAD OF THE INJUNCTION, to order ACCELERATED HEARING. 3. In addition to the above reason, there was no appropriate injunction, in law, strictly speaking, that could have been issued by the Court of Appeal . Why did I say so? The injunction to be issued ordinarily would have been an injunction asking INEC to stop recognizing David Mark . However, that’s one of Nafiu’s MAIN/PRINCIPAL reliefs . Therefore , granting that injunction would have meant determining the case even BEFORE IT IS HEARD. Is that right ? 4. Two, what the Court of Appeal said was that PARTIES ( including INEC) should maintain status quo ante bellum— that is the position of things before the Originating Summons was filed . ( Now, let’s answer this question: What was the position before Nafiu went to the Federal High Court? Answer: David Mark was the interim chairman ) 5. You see, the Court of Appeal COULD NOT have intended that a leadership vacuum should be created in the ADC , which would foster chaos , while the suit continued. Not at all ! If the Court so intended, it would have issued an injunction. Okay? 6. Now, let’s take this hypothetical scenario: If you’re crowned the King of Senseless People, and the Most Senseless Person takes you to court, challenging your installation, an order for maintenance of status quo WOULDN’T mean you’d be dethroned , pending the conclusions of the case. WOULD IT ?! @nelson