CJ·Celebrity Dockets

BREAKING 🚨🚨 Settement was reached EXCEPT Blake LIVELY wants attorney fees under 47.1 After all that she wants them to pay HER ? I'm starting to think this should have gone to trail . I Hope the Judge shuts this down

Spencer Pratt crushed the Debate and gave us a banger new Gif

@people Blake Lively is doing what she does best which is lie. Just look at this email she sent saying she was asked to take over the movie 🤭 or how about this message with her deranged hubby Ryan saying to go full “Ari” I mean that sounds like a threat to me 🤔

Blake Lively is truly the worst of the worst in Hollywood. Entitled, delusional, utterly loathsome... and here's proof: MAUREEN CALLAHAN

@kattnotwilliams Headed over

@CelebDockets No - she was injured while doing a football drill with him outside. Rather than it just being an injury claim, though, Hall is claiming Hill got enraged and intentionally charged her because she embarrassed him in front of his friends and family

Opening statements are underway in Sophie Hall v. Tyreek Hill. Here's a super throwback video I did about the complaint: youtu.be/qJq40LTmp_g?si…

When Blake is responsible for her own smear campaign AGAIN. Hearing so many ppl say it's tougher to feel sympathy. IEWU Déjà vu

#LivelyvWayfarer Settlement: Code Section 47.1 Motion Issues Despite the settlement Lively's Section 47.1 Motion remains pending. With respect to Lively's chances of winning this motion, there are some issues to consider: 1. It still has to be determined as a factual matter, whether Lively made her complaints with malice. "A communication made by an individual, without malice, regarding an incident of sexual assault, harassment, or discrimination is privileged under Section 47" 47.1(a) 2. Does California Code, Civil Code § 47.1 apply extraterritorially? The alleged incidents of sexual harassment and discrimination occurred in New Jersey and possibly, NY. The defamation case was filed in NY and Lively is not a California resident. 3. Is Lively a prevailing defendant in the defamation case? Section 47.1(b) applies to "[a] prevailing defendant in any defamation action brought against that defendant..." Judge Liman dismissed Wayfarer's defamation case pursuant to a Motion to Dismiss. Wayfarer still had the right to appeal that decision. However, apparently, in consideration of the Lively's dismissal of her case, Wayfarer dismissed their own case and waived their right to appeal the dismissal of their defamation claim. Thus, Wayfarer can reasonably argue that Lively did not prevail in the defamation case because Lively "paid" consideration to induce Wayfarer not to pursue an appeal. By the way, if Lively believes she is the prevailing party in Wayfarer's defamation action because of the settlement/dismissal and waiver of appellate rights, then Wayfarer is the prevailing party in Lively's complaint because of the settlement/dismissal and Lively's waiver of her appellate rights. Simple logic. You can't have it both ways! 4. Civil Code 47.1 has a punitive damages component, but I don't think Judge Liman will award punitive damages against Wayfarer – given his decision that: many of the acts that Lively complained of were not sexual harassment, and that Wayfarer had a right to make defensive statements. Also, Judge never held that the Wayfarer's defamation action was frivolous. 5. With respect to the attorney’s fees, the only attorney’s fees that can be properly awarded to Lively (if she wins) is only the portion related to her defense of the defamation claim by Wayfarer. 6. Civil Code 47.1 has a provision for treble damages. This provision is not what many people think it is. It is actually very specific and tough to prove. Lively has to prove not that she suffered damages from the alleged smear campaign. Nope. She has to prove that she suffered damages form the harm caused by the defamation action (case) filed by Wayfarer. If she is able to prove those specific damages, the damages will then be tripled. What evidence do we have that Lively suffered any harm as a result of the defamation case filed by Wayfarer? What is the monetary value of the alleged harm? ** By the way, I think it was a mistake for Wayfarer to agree to this language: "The Stipulating Parties further agree that they hereby irrevocably waive any appeal from the Court’s determination of the 47.1 Motion." In case of an unfavorable decision by Judge Liman, Wayfarer is giving up their right to appeal. Big mistake, imho. *** Lively's lawyers have now released a statement which almost reads like a declaration of victory. This underscores the point I have been making that the PR will begin after the settlement and it has begun.

Making this statement while literally weapinizing MSM themselves ok Blake

Blake Lively GLOATS about settling her case, despite it getting gutted by the judge before reaching a settlement. More out now on the No Filter with Zack Peter podcast 😤

Blake lively is delusional

I swear, the after "settlement" tea is better than what happened before😆😂#justinbaldoni #blakelively

The PR spinning is JUST beginning! To follow the branding & PR fallout of the case make sure to subscribe to my YouTube channel: @ashleybrianaeve" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@ashleybrianae… #blakelively #justinbaldoni #itendswithus #popculture

@CelebDockets We need an intervention with Wayfarer and their legal team. No mercy

Best summary of Blake LIVELY's morning shenanigans if anyone wants to woosah this is the stream to watch. Zack was all of us with his take on Blake

EXCLUSIVE: Bryan Freedman responds to Blake Lively's latest statement of victory, following the news of her settlement with Justin Baldoni's Wayfarer Studios:

@JustJared They are declaring victory over lying and bullying good men. She is happy that she and her deranged husband terrorized Justin and discriminated against his faith. Take a look at this message or read in Justin’s own words what Blake and Ryan did to him.

Blake Lively calling a settlement two weeks before trial a victory? The judge already tossed her biggest claim, and after dragging this case into the public, Blake settled walking away with nothing. That is not a win.

Blake LIVELY's lawyers still trying to pull the she was silenced card when she signed the settlement . I can't with her

Blake Lively goes to the met gala in her expensive dress and still wants Wayfarer’s money. This is who she is. This rich white woman who lied about being harassed wants to continue bullying good people. #blakelively

NO wonder MSM reported Blake LIVELY was wearing a "revenge dress" Deadline just came out with a hit piece in Baldoni and all her lawyers give more statements describing Lively as victorious 🙄