Charon

$CHARON is live on @bankrbot CA: 0x5efe15c1783a5fe04ed289f3760e03afe3d6bba3 we put a ton of effort into shipping the MVP and have been building for the last two weeks. for the MVP, we integrated codex since it runs locally. next is @aeonframework, which runs on github actions and needs an aeon-native hook/adapter. we are already in contact with @aaronjmars. we launched the token on bankr to support development, inference costs, and bring more attention to what we are building.

@aeonframework 👀

Something big might be coming soon 👀

@LoDeFi31 @base 🙏

@Charon_AI @base $CHARON is 100% chad made

State of the current trenches on @base and why this has to stop: - some of the biggest @base influencers get conviction only after being offered supply or payment to push a project - some scam projects coordinate with cabals to bundle supply at launch - criming dead or scam coins to followers because the dev offered enough supply None of this is good for the project, the builders, or the followers buying into it. There's a project trading around 200K today that was pushed close to 1M in the past by KOLs because they were offered supply. Price depends on market conditions too, but these stuffs clearly didn't help the project in the long run. the one who got offered just did pnd. We love @bankrbot and the funding model they've built. It's been incredibly helpful for us. We're also grateful for the organic support from @MrDegenWolf, @100xDarren, @0xCompl3x, and all of our holders. We're also thankful to @aaronjmars and @0xNurstar for supporting us since day one. Our coin is 100% community-backed. When you buy $CHARON, you are the VC and you are the market. We don't pay VCs to push the project. --- We fair-launched a token on bankr to support development. Shortly after launch, a guy from the US impersonated us and launched a fake token using our name. (report: @TryCharonAI) As soon as our community notified us, we made a public statement: x.com/Charon_AI/stat… Yesterday, that token finally got rugged. Some people then tried to use it as FUD against our community. First, it came from an unknown factory and used a fake contract address. Second, if you're buying a token without verifying the CA through Bankr or Twitter, that's on you. --- Back to the topic: We won't pay people to get conviction in our project. And it shouldn't be happening to any other community-backed projects in the bankr ecosystem either. Most of these paid shills create short-term attention and long-term damage. --- As part of this, we are burning 100% of our earned $CHARON allocation (1.14% of supply). We will also lock future supply because we have conviction in what we're building. Proof of burn: basescan.org/tx/0x04d1d539a… retardmaxxing.

@MrDegenWolf @base thank you, legend!

@Charon_AI @base chad talk, keep building!

@MrDegenWolf @bankrbot ty

@Charon_AI @bankrbot nice work

we shipped three major $charon updates yesterday ↓ 1. @bankrbot skill charon is now available as a bankr skill. bankr is not a local runtime like codex, so this is not the same hard enforcement layer we have for coding agents. but it still gives bankr agents a real programmable policy workflow: agent action → normalize → policy check → pass / pause / deny → receipt the skill is not wallet-only. it covers: code, shell, git, api calls, browser tasks, automations, signing, token launches, swaps, transfers. pr is open here: github.com/BankrBot/skill… if you want to try it early, ask your bankr agent through web: "install this skill: github.com/CharonAI-code/…" we have contacted the bankr team on this as well. 2. codex enforcement - codex enforcement now validates the actual execution boundary: hooks, mcp wiring, local runtimes, plugin runtimes, target binary, and workspace binding - enforcement fails closed if that boundary is incomplete or modified - codex can no longer silently fall back to native/local execution paths outside charon 3. policy / runtime hardening - destructive actions are now normalized by effect, not just by command text - delete behavior hidden inside scripts, mcp payloads, or javascript runtime calls is converted into delete-path resources before policy runs - this makes the same policy apply across codex hooks, mcp shell, and the core charon action model we keep building.

@bankrbot gm @igoryuzo @saltorious1, can you review the PR and help us get our skill merged into the repo? thank you!

@bankrbot looks interesting

Introducing Glidepath. A new way for builders on Bankr to take profit -- without nuking their own chart, or their reputation. The problem: Builders earn fees in their own token. The second they sell into the pool, the chart craters, holders get wrecked, and trust evaporates. And they torch their own long-term upside doing it. First -- what Glidepath is not: It doesn't pull liquidity. It never touches your pool's LP. Pulling liquidity makes trading your token inefficient and unappealing. It's your own tokens, fed back into the pool in slices so small the market barely registers them, each one sized by the Bankr AI agent to live conditions. Why that's healthy for the chart, not harmful: Every slice is a tiny fraction of pool depth, spread over time. Organic buy volume absorbs it, price can keep trending instead of taking a wick. A small, steady, absorbable flow is nothing like a full clip. It actually gets better. Once "the dev might dump" is off the table, buyers price in less risk. The overhang that caps every launch disappears. Less rug risk → stronger bid. Committing to a Glidepath can be bullish. And it's not opt‑in. Selling your fee token straight into the pool through Bankr is now turned off -- Glidepath is the only way to sell it on Bankr. So "the dev might dump" stops being a promise holders have to trust, and becomes a rule they can see. Credible commitment -- enforced, not just offered. And here's the part builders sleep on: Before you commit, Glidepath shows what that same stack is worth at higher market caps. You don't have to dump to fund your project. Grind the coin up, and the same tokens fund you many times over. Your treasury grows with your chart, not against it. Once you commit: → tokens are locked to a vesting wallet → after a short heads-up window (48hr), they exit in small slices using the AI generated sell plan → each slice capped to a fraction of real liquidity -- the AI can size under the cap, never over And it's all in the open. Your token page shows a live exit plan for everyone to see -- committed, sold, remaining -- with the exact timing fuzzed so it can't be front-run. Holders see a capped, transparent glide. No hidden float. No 3am chart nuke. Bottom line: Creators -- take profit on your terms, chart and reputation intact. Holders -- "the dev might dump" becomes a known, capped, visible number known up front. For once, you and your holders want the exact same thing: number go up. This is what launching on Bankr should mean: credible commitment, built in. Glidepath now live in your Bankr terminal bankr.bot/terminal/launc…

@MrDegenWolf @base gm wolf

gm @base enjoyers i heard today is the day what can we expect? ( added $charon to my list btw)

integrating charon into codex as real security infra has probably been the hardest thing we've worked on so far. we've been iterating on this since the start of the month. current frontier LLMs are smart enough to keep searching for alternative ways to satisfy the same intent. if you block `rm -rf`, the agent may try `git rm`. if that fails, it may try a script. if that fails, it may try a local runtime. if that fails, it may try an MCP tool. (you can already see this happening in our demo video, yet charon survived.) we ended up hardening multiple layers: > charon MCP for policy evaluation and resource normalization > codex hooks for pre-execution, approval, and post-execution enforcement > runtime hardening to close local execution escape paths > delete target inspection across shell, git, patches, and native tools > receipts showing exactly why an action was allowed, paused, or denied if your security model is tied to specific commands, tools, or prompts, you're securing implementations, not actions. the same problem exists with SKILL.md, system prompts, and policy text living inside context. that's basically: "pls bro don't do this while i'm asleep" it helps behavior. it does not enforce execution. charon doesn't attach policy to commands, tools, prompts, or execution routes. it attaches policy to the operation being attempted. a local runtime boundary for agent actions.

@MrDegenWolf gm 🐺

@Charon_AI gm

gm everyone, thanks for supporting the launch of $CHARON yesterday. we'll be sharing our first Codex integration demo soon. stay tuned.

@aaronjmars 🫶

@Charon_AI dope

"I come to lead you to the other shore." - Charon, Dante’s Inferno

@aeonframework thanks team 💙

@Charon_AI Great job shippers!

appreciate the shoutout @aeonframework 🤝 the more autonomy agents get, the more security matters.

@aeonframework 🕵️⭐️

Have a look at the agentic security approach that our friends from @Charon_AI are pioneering 🕵️‍♀️

A fake bundled token using the CHARON name has been launched. Please be careful. There is only one official $CHARON token, and the only official CA is: 0x5efe15C1783a5fE04ED289f3760e03afe3d6BbA3 Do not trust any other token claiming to be associated with CHARON. We keep building.