Christopher Edmerson

If we did this, the President of the United States would currently be Donald Trump.

Texas is waking up, one school board election at a time. It’s all fun and games on the internet until you realize that your children will be at a massive educational disadvantage because the whackadoodles on the school board decided to remove entire chapters from the state approved curriculum for being too “woke.” Science is real and vaccines save lives. Tommy Jr won’t be successful in his path to be a Harvard educated physician without this basic knowledge.

The president posted this about House Democratic Leader Jeffries shortly after 11 pm last night.

"The unemployment rate is low. The stock market is high. Consumer spending is healthy. But ask Americans how they’re doing, and you’d think we were in a recession," per WSJ

Pistons on life support.

We are ready to support customers who may be impacted if Spirit Airlines ceases operations, with a focus on helping people continue their travel plans with low-fare options.

Joker should be thrown out the game.....

The current narrative claims that Black Americans have somehow lost their right to vote because of the Supreme Court’s latest decision Louisiana. This is such a ridiculous spin on facts. On April 29, the Court ruled 6–3 against Louisiana’s congressional map, finding that the push to create a second majority Black district relied too heavily on race and crossed into unconstitutional racial gerrymandering. This is a very specific ruling that has nothing to do about ruling on whether anyone can vote. Federal protections under the Voting Rights Act still exist; none of that was stripped away in this decision. What the Court IS saying is that race can’t remain a primary ongoing factor in drawing political maps, especially without clear, current evidence that it’s necessary. Of course the Left is using this as a way to be offended. They want to divide us over skin color. Because some of the reactions online with prominent politicians aren’t really about access to voting. They’re about whether certain groups should continue to have separate standards applied to how representation is structured. If the claim is that fairness requires permanent race based intervention, then it’s worth asking where that ends? At what point does an outdated safeguard become something that never gets re-evaluated and becomes something else entirely? And that is victimizing a race that is rarely judged on the color of their skin like they were 50 years ago. This current ruling doesn’t discriminate against anyone. But, it does force a harder question about how long race should be used as the deciding factor in it. The truth is, we will never move past discrimination until we stop being afraid to question the systems built around it, even the ones created with good intentions.

Please Hawks, don’t embarrass me tonight. I just need to see yall compete at the very least