Rape Kamala Harris Groyper

Nick Fuentes is the only forecasting model with 100% accuracy. No one out there mogs and has, is, or will ever yield this kind of precision on expected outcome.

On one level, this seems entirely unnecessary. The Pope undoubtedly wields influence and authority, but he doesn’t have many legions. And we’re used to religious figures vaguely condemning war. Seemingly, the Trump people don’t just want to “put the Vatican in its place” (mostly unnecessary), they want the Vatican on their side! The Bush era featured the evangelical Protestants as die-hard supporters of the terror war and Americanism. Now, it seems, Trumpworld wants the Vatican to join some sort of “Trad Alliance of the Based,” which might very well include “Orthodox Russia.” I’m no Catholic, but I genuinely like and admire Papa Bob from the South Side, and I expect him to resist this arrangement.

@SeverusChud She’s German right

The fact that this type of woman is on the verge of extinction should terrify you.

Let's get this straight. Why are all the people who warned us the bad guys? Why do you think? Are you still in denial?

Our government has more loyalty to јеwіѕh реdорhіӏеѕ than the Catholic Church

@US_of_Z @AFpost Jewish

@AFpost I'm getting tired of the administration's protestant radicalism.

A meeting between Cardinal Christophe Pierre and the Pentagon was described as a bitter lecture, during which a U.S. official invoked the Avignon Papacy, a 14th-century period when the French crown used military power to influence the papacy, as an implicit warning to the Church. Follow: @AFpost

You aren't legally permitted to question the competence of black people when hiring or renting or admitting to school, only when they murder a White person.

Only the white mind can comprehend this type of architecture

What’s that you say? An earth flag? A flag which retains symmetry in any orientation? Something that represents our unique astronomical perspective in the universe? Something associated with the pioneers of space travel? Okay just hear me out, purely AESTHETICALLY speaking..

*Japan interacts with right wing twitter Japan’s news the next day:

>Strong Catholic male hero figure >Demonizes corrupt government officials & excessive taxation >Fights against state overreach >Defends the innocent from criminals >Protects the Church & Franciscan friars >Family man ​Unbelievably based

Lo malo de las tetas, es que vienen pegadas a una mentirosa

My client pleads “retarded nigger” your honor

PoV: Congress passes the (no) Dignity Act.

Jeśli dziwicie się czemu Kościół katolicki ustanowił inkwizycję i gorliwie zwalczał przez wieki herezje, to popatrzcie do czego prowadzi amerykański protestantyzm ewangelikalny i wyciągnijcie z tego wnioski.

Victory for big tits. All hail big, sweet, milky tiddies, the undisputed winner of the war

america was about to go on the most brain melting run of all time and then baby boomers took three puffs of ditch weed and decided enriching the third world would be more chill

@kenzietuff It’s true though

Deport.

"Humanity would sink into eternal darkness, it would fall into a dull and primitive state, were the jews to win this war" -Joseph Goebelles Good night.

There's a physicist at Stanford named Safi Bahcall who modeled this exact principle and the math is wild. He calls it "phase transitions in human networks." When you're stationary, your probability of a lucky event is limited to your existing surface area: the people you already know, the places you already go, the ideas you've already been exposed to. Your opportunity window is fixed. When you move, your collision rate with new nodes in a network increases nonlinearly. Double your movement (new conversations, new cities, new projects) and your probability of a serendipitous encounter doesn't double. It roughly quadruples. Because each new node connects you to their entire network, not just to them. Richard Wiseman ran a 10-year study at the University of Hertfordshire tracking self-described "lucky" and "unlucky" people. The single biggest differentiator wasn't IQ, education, or family money. Lucky people scored significantly higher on one trait: openness to experience. They talked to strangers more, varied their routines more, and said yes to invitations at nearly twice the rate. The "unlucky" group followed the same routes, ate at the same restaurants, and talked to the same 5 people. Their networks were closed loops. No new inputs, no new collisions. Luck isn't random. Luck is surface area. And surface area is a function of movement. The lobster emoji is doing more work than most people realize. Lobsters grow by shedding their shell when it gets too tight. The growth requires a period of total vulnerability. No protection, no armor, soft body exposed to the ocean. That's the cost of movement nobody posts about. You have to be uncomfortable first. The new shell only hardens after you've already moved.