Kalvin Cook 리트윗함
Kalvin Cook
283 posts

Kalvin Cook 리트윗함

Germany's Chancellor has opened around 300 criminal investigations against people who insulted him. His office spent months in court trying to hide which prosecutors were handling them. They lost.
A guy in Stuttgart called Merz a "drunkard." Police searched his house.
A court just ordered Germany's Chancellor to reveal every prosecutor handling his insult cases.
reclaimthenet.org/merz-insult-la…
English
Kalvin Cook 리트윗함
Kalvin Cook 리트윗함

7 Jewish men in Israel literally lynched an Ethiopian immigrant working in a pizza shop.
He asked them not to spray confetti in the store and they dragged him out of there and beat him to death.
FYI: This is Israeli press reporting it.
timesofisrael.com/six-teens-arre…
English
Kalvin Cook 리트윗함
Kalvin Cook 리트윗함
Kalvin Cook 리트윗함
Kalvin Cook 리트윗함
Kalvin Cook 리트윗함

@iranin_arabic Why are we using a clip that talks about the reunification process with Taiwan? Shouldn't you use a specific article or clip of this content?
English
Kalvin Cook 리트윗함
Kalvin Cook 리트윗함
Kalvin Cook 리트윗함

"I was just following orders" was rejected as a defence at the Nuremberg trials by the way
Daily Iran News@DailyIranNews
Israeli soldiers confirm that Netanyahu is forcing them to eliminate innocent children.
English
Kalvin Cook 리트윗함

REVEALED: THE "BALLROOM" AND "RADICAL LEFTISM" PSYOPS ARE COVER FOR A "STARGATE COMMAND" UNDERGROUND DATA CENTER & PALANTIR-STYLE MASS SURVEILLANCE STATE
THE BALLROOM
Trump is building a 90,000 square foot ballroom with a 1,000 person capacity. Hardly adequate for the White House Correspondents Dinner which was attended by 2,600 people. But we're told that we need the ballroom in order to host events like the WHCD in the future. Bullsh*t.
COST & LOCATION
The cost has ballooned to over $300-$400 million. We're told it's being privately funded and being sold on that as being a good thing that won't cost the taxpayers. Here's the reality: private funding means no congressional oversight or appropriations, no budget hearings, no public scrutiny.
Furthermore, when infrastructure is part of the Executive Office of the President at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, it can be CLASSIFIED under "executive privilege." The entire executive branch will be able to run this data center without oversight or checks & balances.
PROJECT STARGATE
On January 21, 2025, shortly after the inauguration, Trump stood with Larry Ellison & Sam Altman to announce Project Stargate. A $500 Billion initiative to build data centers & AI infrastructure.
Circling back to the "Ballroom." why would it cost $300 million, ballooning upwards of $400 million now? None. But an underground bunker data center would. What kind of underground facility costs that much?
For reference, in 2021, Larry Ellison's Oracle built a 150k sq ft $319 million data center for israeli military intelligence several stories underground. The same Larry Ellison of Project Stargate who said Americans need to get used to a total surveillance state. The same Larry Ellison who just bought Tiktok to censor anti-israel content & push pro-israel messaging. The same Larry Ellison whose son David just acquired Paramount-CBS and Warner Bros Discovery. The same Larry Ellison who's the top private donor to the IDF. The same Larry Ellison who's close friends with Benjamin Netanyahu, and supporter of Netanyahu's 8th front information war on Americans.
This takes us to the lead architect:
LEAD ARCHITECT
Shalom Baranes, a jewish immigrant to the US via the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS), has been appointed architect. Previously, Baranes was the architect for the post-911 hardening & rebuilding of a little building called the Pentagon. SCIFs, bomb-proofing, compartmentalization, etc.—the whole 9 yards. Baranes has no expertise designing ballrooms, that I could find. But he did help renovate one at the National Red Cross Headquarters once. Besides his renovation of Pentagon Wedges 2-5, he's also done the U.S. Treasury Building modernization, and the Department of the Interior Headquarters & GSA National Headquarters renovations. It seems his talents center around building secure federal infrastructure, not event halls.
SELLING IT TO THE PUBLIC
Under the guise of a ballroom, they've sought to build this under our noses. But they've undertaken another angle: "radical Left-wing terrorism." WE JUST HAVE TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT RADICAL LEFT-WING TERRORISM. That was the messaging after the Iryna Zarutska slaying, the transgender shooting of the Catholic children's school, and notably the Charlie Kirk assassination. Within minutes to hours, the "Radical Left" was being blamed for the killing Charlie. You will remember the massive PR campaign launched after Charlie's assassination, promoting Palantir-style surveillance to solve the problem of the "radical Left."
Now, after this latest shooting at the WHCD, they're recommitting to this narrative of radical Left terrorism, and once again using this violent event to promote the ballroom. THAT THE MILITARY REALLY WANTS, GUYS. WE REALLY NEED THIS BALLROOM THAT WILL PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR NEW SECURITY THREATS.
Here's the tell: Remember when Trump was asked about Charlie Kirk on September 11, 2025—the day after Charlie was assassinated? And Trump started rambling on about the ballroom? He'd just blamed the "Radical Left" for Charlie's murder, even though Tyler Robinson was not yet in custody and there was no known motive. But in his head he was clearly already linking Charlie to the Ballroom. Why? Because of the pre-concocted narrative that Charlie's death would be exploited to promote the national surveillance state.
The ballroom has faced opposition and is currently being slowed by the judicial system. But when have our zionist tech overlords ever taken "no" for an answer?
FISA AND THE SURVEILLANCE STATE
Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act authorizes warrantless spying on foreigners. This often captures Americans' data and messages. It's essentially a backdoor for spying on us, and that's how it's been used. Section 702 was set to expire literally this past April 20th, but it received an emergency extension to April 30th. The timing of the WHCD shooting and the immediate promotion of the "Ballroom" are eyebrow-raising to say the least.
CONCLUSION
They're building a Stargate Command bunker under the ballroom, and they need us to buy the ballroom narrative bullsh*t in order to gin up public support to ram this through against the opposition it's currently facing.
This facility will most likely be the nerve center hub of the new "national security" Palantir spy infrastructure and digital control grid panopticon. In short, an essential facility to continue helping to enslave us, and putting any oversight by WE THE PEOPLE beyond our control. For israel's benefit, and the jewish global empire-national security state blob.
I don't think so. I'm America First & Only, and israel/ballroom LAST.
H/t & follow: @thedreydossier
Some Sources:



English
Kalvin Cook 리트윗함
Kalvin Cook 리트윗함

AI Alex Karp drops the act in video that went viral for the heels of controversial Palantir Manifesto ‘Yes, we’ll own you, now GET THE F OUT OF HERE, PEASANT’
RT@RT_com
Palantir's 'Technological Republic' is the Mein Kampf of the digital era It argues for militarism, thinly-veiled racism and letting elites run wild It's a sick man's vision of the future ⬇️
English

@CliveRenfro @RT_com @JasonBassler1 Bro come on, at least listen to the interviews from these shitty tech richers. They say exactly what they want out loud and it is detrimental to regular folks like me and you
English

@RT_com @JasonBassler1 Oh well if Russian state media says so…
English
Kalvin Cook 리트윗함

'You're deluded if don't think Palantir's newest AI assassination system will be turned against the American people'
RT@RT_com
Palantir whistleblower: tech 'TERRORIST TO TAKE OVER US GOVT deeply embedding' from Pentagon to Treasury 'We are currently an occupied nation'
English

@JonnieKing Probably ties to Feds or the "Epstein class" after these periods
English

@BernardMacking @RT_com Sanitization of a Freikorps type group basically. Propaganda in the colloquial sense but not in the essence of propaganda and agitational materials
English
















