EndTimesEnjoyer

@RichardHanania Getting cucked by liberalism has its own thrill

I naturally have fascist instincts, but I can't be a fascist because I am too smart and intellectually honest. Aesthetically, I love hierarchy, tradition, etc. But every non-liberal thinker is embarrassingly bad. There's no honest alternative.

SEE THIS CUTE BUNNY? HE FUCKIN' DIES IF YOU DON'T OPEN THE FUCKIN' STRAIT

@NateSilver538 Fixed for you

@usamakbhatti Bro fought soviets...current guy fights youthias

He was what the current chief thinks he is.

We gotta beat Nigeria though

I find the whole Indian (Hindu radical & liberal both) historiography a scam, marked by double standards and flawed terminology. Unfortunately, the incompetence of Indian Muslim historiographers let this flourish. For example: their framing of native and foreigner. Let me elaborate this. The Hindus are not a single biological race, nor even a coherent cluster. Across history, conquest and assimilation have played a decisive role in the spread of Vedic-based traditions. Even without going into the Aryan age, relatively recent examples make this clear: groups like the Hunas and Sakas were absorbed and Hinduised, and their descendants live among us today. The Ahom conquers of Assam too (originally Chinese) later integrated and are now celebrated within Hindu discourse as a group triumphant against Islamic hegemony. This is not an issue in itself. It becomes one when the same framework is selectively used to judge Indian Muslim history. The categories of "foreign" and "native," as deployed in Hindu-centric narratives, are inconsistent and inapplicable to Indian Muslims. The issue with Hindu historiography lies in its tendency to equate Indianness with the Vedic or Puranic sphere. This is flawed. Large sections of medieval India, particularly animist communities, existed entirely outside these traditions. If anything, Puranic traditions often absorbed elements from them, not the other way around. Were they not Indians? Hindus refer to their country as Bharat, a name derived from the Bharata tribe, from which the term "Bharatavarsha" is said to have emerged after their triumph over various other tribes of the Indian subcontinent. The question, then, is - how is a name rooted in conquest and subjugation applied to all Indians? Are all Hindus (or Indians) descendants of the Bharata clan? Of course not. On the contrary, the Indian Muslim worldview regards Adam (god's blessings be upon him) to have landed in India, a thing well recorded by Ibn Ishaq (704-768), the first biographer of the Prophet, and At-Tabari (839-923) with hadiths with chains going back to the days of Prophet. Unlike Hindus, the Indian Muslim perspectives regard India as a primordial homeland of humanity and situate identity within a distinct process of community formation. This process began to take shape in the late 18th century, accelerated after 1835, and consolidated over the following century. During this time, the Hindustani Muslim identity (once largely confined to the Ganges plain) expanded and absorbed regional distinctions. This was similar to how the Farsi (Persian) identity, once limited to the small region of Fars in Iran, expanded across large parts of the Middle East and Central Asia. Take the example of Sultan Qutubuddin Aibak. He, from an Indian Muslim perspective, is not foreigner, but foundational to the Indian Muslim historical continuity. He is their first major political patriarch. His legacy is embedded within the community, not external to it and no community on earth can claim him, except them. This is the failure of Indian Muslim historiography to clearly define its own process of community formation, which led not just the Hindus but foreigner Muslims (eg: Iranians, Rumelians and Anatolians, and Central Asians) to claim the Indian Muslim Heritage and history. When every major society acadmeicall articulated their historical evolution and community formation, Indian Muslims still lack a an academically enforced narrative of community formation and definition. Therefore, there is a clear need to separate Indian Muslim historiography from Hindu-centric frameworks, and to develop an independent approach rooted in its own historical experience, categories, and continuity.

people have no idea how Erdogan transformed the city as mayor

Man come on Iran shouldn't just develop nukes but also icbms capable of hitting US so next time no US pig dare attack them

@hashurtag They would have traded it for complete sanctions relief but then US attacked cuz Trump won't give them sanctions relief. Now they have enriched uranium and control over SOH which makes the option of sanctions relief less appealing

The problem - and no one has been able to explain this problem - is that why is Iran hanging onto 60% enriched uranium? What is this mad game of Russian Roulette with fissile material? Either make the damn bomb or just give it up. Why are you using this to blackmail others?

@bethanyshondark You support killing Palestinians. She trolls a widow. We know who is more abhorrent

Personally I wouldn’t take smiling photos with a woman who spent the last six months terrorizing a widow 🙃

My Cat: Open the Fuckin’ Wet Food, you crazy bastard, or you’ll be living in Hell - JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah.

MR. GORBACHEV TEAR DOWN THIS FUCKIN' WALL YOU CRAZY BASTARD OR YOU'LL BE LIVING IN HELL. PRAISE BE TO ALLAH!

@hashurtag Did pak army launch that operation to protect Biharis?

Crazy. Yasir is just losing it. Can you please stay away from excessive political commentary? These are terrible takes and not grounded in facts but pure Indian propaganda. More Biharis were brutalized by Mukti Bahini than Bengaldeshis were at the hands of Pak army. Moreover, Biharis continue to be oppressed in Bangladesh even today stripped of all rights. Smitten by this silly Iranophilic disease, you will run with anything to please Daniel and crew.

What Gargash means is that they have no choice but to double down on US imperial protection because they have assessed that all other options are worse for them

@iyad_elbaghdadi Also any sanctions relief can be reversed by Trump or his successor. With SOT Iran has its destiny in its own hands.

This is true, and is the structural reason we are locked into the current path. Iran wants "reparations", economic relief, and security guarantees. The easiest and most reliable way to get them is to control the Straits of Hormuz.

STOP COMPARING NATIONAL SOCIALIST GERMANY TO MODERN DAY ISRAELIS! Darryl Cooper nails it here. The idea that Germans were killing kids and celebrating like modern day Israelis is a cartoonish version of history, and not real at all. Put down your Robert Maxwell approved textbooks and read some real revisionist sources…

@asadfacts @Eagle220468 Iran exercises significant control over Iraq due to the same shias.... Khomeini was wrong in the 80s...proven right after Saddam fall

I bet no Pakistani mullah ever told you that Saddam’s Iraq had two Shia PMs, a Shia foreign minister, and numerous Shia generals - including his son-in-law, Gen. Maher, Commander of III Corps, who alone was responsible for killing 50k+ Iranian soldiers. Not to mention the tens of thousands of Iraqi Shias who died fighting for Baathist Iraq against Khomeinist Iran. Iraqi Shias - especially the tribal ones and sensible Ayatollahs like Ayatollah Sistani - were pragmatic enough to understand a basic rule of the nation-state era: communities that remain loyal to their states survive. The Khomeinists, blinded by their sectarian lens, assumed Iraqi Shias would mutiny and defect. No wonder Iran failed to capture even an inch of Iraq after eight years and 500k dead.

@rasalghul5353 @faisal_parla both

@faisal_parla Hanged for sheltering osama or failure to protect osama??

If Pakistan had a free democracy, some Of the people of that era should have been hanged.

@ZoomerHistorian So you would prefer losing your entire military equipment to save one soldier....what the fuck that and remaining soldier will use in the event of continuing war which would result in the deaths of even more soldiers...come on man

I'm completely and utterly against this war, but one European life is worth more than all the military equipment in the world.