

Darth Fëanor
53K posts

@DarthFeanor
Me gusta Star Wars; pero también soy Geek, Gamer, Creador de contenido y Crypto bro a tiempo parcial.



A pesar de que Liam Neeson aseguró que no le gustó cómo murió su personaje en «La Amenaza Fantasma», ese trágico suceso fue clave para la saga #StarWars. Tristemente, el superlativo nivel de esas coreografías no se ha vuelto a ver en la “era Disney”.



George Lucas's original ideas for Luke Skywalker in his sequel trilogy that never was.



La eterna pregunta: ¿Cuál es mejor?

Sydney Sweeney en la temporada 3 es literalmente humillarla. No entiendo como no ven q no es por acá, su papel se reduce a básicamente a HUMILLARLA, no va a ganar ningún premio así. La visten de bebe simulando ser un bebé con chupete para q? 🤮



Daisy Ridley says calling her character in Star Wars A Mary Sue is sexist: “The Mary Sue thing in itself is sexist because it’s the name of a woman. Everyone was saying that Luke had the exact same [capabilities]. I think Rey is incredible vulnerable, and nothing she’s doing is for the greater good. She’s just doing what she thinks is the right thing. And she doesn’t want to do some of it, but she feels compelled to do it. So for me, I was just confused.” Is this why modern Star Wars fails because they can't understand criticism?

A qué edad llega el vato que su love language sea resolver




I think something that needs to be discussed, since people try to sugar coat it, is that Mary Sue is absolutely a gendered term. And that's a good thing. Because the way men and women (and feminized men) write overpowered characters in western fiction is fundamentally different. We see the term "Gary Stu" used to describe a male Mary Sue but honestly, they're not the same. Superman is a Gary Stu. All of his power he never earned. He landed on a planet who's sun basically turns him into a physical god. He's so unbelievably powerful that the list of beings who are actually on his level and can physically hurt him is incredibly small. His journey as a character is one of forging a bond with the lesser beings beneath him in strength. Not to lord over them, but because he cares for them. It's not about him, it's about them. His power is useless to him if he can't use it to save a single life. And every connection he has is earned by building trust with common humanity. Even with all that power, he had to work for his recognition. It didn't come easy, and he earned it. And he has to work to maintain it. When men write overpowered characters, usually male ones at that, it contains with it an understanding that power isn't everything. Other overpowered male characters follow this principle. They're compelling because of their personal journey to become better men. The power aspect is secondary to it all. Mary Sues like Rey, meanwhile, never have this aspect to them. They never have to earn friendship, love, or adoration. Everyone wants to either fuck them or befriend them on sight. Rey is not only full of unearned power, but unearned adoration and love. She never does anything to earn people's respect, friendship, or love. It just happens because she's there and she's just so irresistible that no one can tell her, "No." Women and feminized men write wish fulfillment to create a proxy for their desire to be the center of attention. Men write wish fulfillment to show what it means to be a good man with power, and the rewards of the work put in with that power. Mary Sues and Gary Stus are not the same. Gary Stus have literary value. Mary Sues do not.

Gente hoy no habrá directo pero mañana vamos a jugar el Dunsbord 2.0 , ahora es personal


Tolkien sento las bases de la fantasia pero ha sido superado en muchos aspectos. Abercrombie denunciando los horrores de la guerra y la revolucion industrial es mejor, por no hablar de los personajes. En cuanto a la trama y la prosa Martin lo supera.