Delrue Vincent ๐Ÿฅณ๐ŸŽ‰๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช

16.8K posts

Delrue Vincent ๐Ÿฅณ๐ŸŽ‰๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช banner
Delrue Vincent ๐Ÿฅณ๐ŸŽ‰๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช

Delrue Vincent ๐Ÿฅณ๐ŸŽ‰๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช

@DelrueV

Pur produit du BW et de Bxl. Importรฉ ds la verte province. Volontaire pour developper tt ce qui peut รชtre positif. Carpe diem. AMDG

Arlon ๊ฐ€์ž…์ผ ลžubat 2012
1.1K ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰309 ํŒ”๋กœ์›Œ
Delrue Vincent ๐Ÿฅณ๐ŸŽ‰๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Lucius Gellius Publicola ๐Ÿบ
Trump qui se compare ร  Alexandre le Grand ou Jules Cรฉsar ! Mais contrairement ร  lui, ces deux grands stratรจges antiques n'hรฉsitaient pas ร  se retrouver en 1ere ligne de bataille, dans l'esprit greco -romain oรน le chef entraine et encourage ses hommes par l'exemple dans des mouvements tactiques. Cรฉsar semblait toutefois plus prudent qu'Alexandre, mรชme s'il n'est pas passรฉ loin du drame ร  plusieurs reprise. Alexandre lui, tout assurรฉ de son origine divine, prenait tous les risques qui lui valurent 6 blessures graves! Sur les bords du Granique, un coup d'รฉpรฉe perse fendit son casque jusquโ€™au cuir chevelu ; ร  Gaza, il reรงut une flรจche dans lโ€™รฉpaule et tomba de cheval. ร€ Maracanda, une autre flรจche le toucha au mollet avec une telle force que le tibia se brisa et pointa hors de la blessure ! Quelque part en Hyrcanie, une pierre le frappa au cou : sa vue sโ€™en trouva affaiblie et pendant plusieurs jours on craignit la cรฉcitรฉฬ dรฉfinitive ; chez les Assacรฉniens, une flรจche indienne le toucha ร  la cheville (cโ€™est en cette circonstance quโ€™il dit en souriant aux flatteurs qui lโ€™entouraient : ยซ Cโ€™est bien du sang que vous voyez et non pas de lโ€™ichรดr, tel quโ€™il court dans les veines des dieux ยป) ; ร  Issos, dโ€™aprรจs Charรจs, il reรงut ร  la cuisse un coup dโ€™รฉpรฉe assรฉnรฉ lord de son affrontement direct avec le roi Darius . ยซ Pour ma part, il se trouve que jโ€™ai reรงu un coup dโ€™รฉpรฉe ร  la cuisse, mais la blessure nโ€™a eu aucune consรฉquence fรขcheuse, ni sur le moment, ni par la suite ยป ; chez les Malles en Inde, une flรจche puisante de deux coudรฉes de long (env. 60 cm) transperรงa sa cuirasse et le toucha ร  la poitrine, et failli lui รชtre fatale! Ailleurs, quelquโ€™un lโ€™atteignit ร  la nuque dโ€™un coup de javelot! La blessure est un chose mais y survivre par la suite est aussi une autre affaire, compte tenu des conditions de soins sommaires malgrรฉ les qualitรฉs de son medecin!
Lucius Gellius Publicola ๐Ÿบ tweet media
Franรงais
2
8
46
1.4K
Delrue Vincent ๐Ÿฅณ๐ŸŽ‰๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
DAZN Belgique
DAZN Belgique@DAZN_BEFRยท
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช | Kevin De Bruyne marque son premier but depuis 6๏ธโƒฃ mois ! ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿ”™ #NapoliCremonese
Franรงais
0
10
51
2.9K
Delrue Vincent ๐Ÿฅณ๐ŸŽ‰๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Institute for the Study of War
Institute for the Study of War@TheStudyofWarยท
MORE: The IRGC is responsible for coordinating and conducting military actions, but has historically not directly interfered in Iranian diplomacy and negotiations to the extent it currently does. The IRGCโ€™s consolidation of control over Iranian decision-making indicates that the Iranian political officials currently negotiating with the United States do not have the authority to independently determine Iranโ€™s negotiating positions. CTP-ISW recently assessed that the United States is negotiating with a divided committee of hardliners and pragmatists that lacks a cohesive, unified position. The IRGC appears to have sidelined more pragmatic figures with whom the United States has negotiated. Araghchi and Ghalibafโ€™s negotiating team reportedly did not have full authority to finalize a deal with the United States in Islamabad, for example.
Institute for the Study of War tweet media
Institute for the Study of War@TheStudyofWar

NEW: Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) Commander Major General Ahmad Vahidi and members of his inner circle have likely secured at least temporary control over not only Iranโ€™s military response in this conflict but also Iranโ€™s negotiating position and approach within the past 48 hours. The IRGC Navy attacked several commercial vessels on April 18 and declared that no vessel of โ€œany type or nationalityโ€ is permitted passage through the strait, a reversal of Iranian Foreign Affairs Minister Abbas Araghchiโ€™s announcement on April 17 that the strait was โ€œcompletely openโ€ to commercial traffic. IRGC-affiliated media also announced on April 18 that Iran has not agreed to participate in another round of negotiations with the United States due to โ€œexcessiveโ€ US demands. Other Key Takeaways: Vahidi and individuals close to him may have effectively controlled the negotiations process throughout the war, which is traditionally a role reserved for political leaders. Vahidi likely intended to impose IRGC oversight over the recent US-Iran talks in Islamabad. The IRGC continued to play an outsized role in Iranโ€™s negotiations after the Islamabad talks. The IRGCโ€™s consolidation of control over Iranian decision-making indicates that the Iranian political officials currently negotiating with the United States do not have the authority to independently determine Iranโ€™s negotiating positions. The IRGC appears to have sidelined more pragmatic figures with whom the United States has negotiated. The IRGC attacked several commercial vessels and halted traffic in the Strait of Hormuz on April 18, likely in order to both gain leverage over the United States and consolidate the IRGCโ€™s control over Iranโ€™s negotiations policy as part of an internally-motivated maneuver. The IRGC likely aims to secure leverage over the United States by halting traffic and driving up shipping and oil prices to impose economic pressure on the United States. The IRGCโ€™s actions are also likely intended to be an internal demonstration of power designed to exhibit the IRGCโ€™s control within the regime, and in particular, its control over Iranโ€™s negotiations policy. The US Navyโ€™s blockade of Iranian ports remains in place as of April 18. US CENTCOM said that it forced two ships to turn around and return to Iran between April 17 and 18. The US Navy has forced 23 ships to turn back since the United States began the blockade. No Iranian vessels have attempted to approach or test the blockade line as of this writing.

English
38
248
709
231.8K
Delrue Vincent ๐Ÿฅณ๐ŸŽ‰๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช
๐Ÿ˜œ
James Tate@JamesTate121

Too on point not to share, โ€œAussie reply to Trump rant about NATO not being there for us. Mate. You run a country with 600,000 homeless people sleeping on the street tonight. A country where 40% of adults can't cover a $400 emergency without borrowing money. A country where insulin costs more than a car payment and people are rationing it to survive. A country where medical debt is the number 1 cause of bankruptcy. A country where women are dying in hospital car parks because doctors are too scared of abortion laws to treat a miscarriage. You lock up more of your own citizens than any nation on earth. More than China. More than Russia. More than North Korea. The land of the free has 2 million people in cages, and a quarter of them haven't even been convicted of anything. They're just too poor to make bail. Your life expectancy is going backwards. You're the only developed nation where that's happening. Your infant mortality rate is worse than Cuba's. Your kids do active shooter drills between maths and English while you sell the gunmaker's stock to your mates. Your minimum wage hasn't moved in 15 years. You've got teachers working 2 jobs and veterans sleeping under bridges and you just spent a trillion dollars flattening a country that didn't attack you. And youโ€™ve got a convicted felon, adjudicating raping, paedophile protecting, porn star shagging insurrectionist running the biggest dumpster fire war campaign since the Taliban thanked you very much for losing again. And you're calling Greenland poorly run? Greenland has universal healthcare. Free education. One of the lowest incarceration rates in the world. Nobody goes bankrupt there because they got sick. Nobody dies in a waiting room because their insurance said no. "NATO wasn't there when we needed them." When exactly was that, champ? September 11? Because NATO invoked Article 5 for the first and only time in history FOR YOU. Soldiers from dozens of countries deployed, fought, bled, and died in Afghanistan FOR YOU. Australia wasn't even in NATO and we still showed up. For 20 years. And you pulled out at 2am without telling anyone and left them to deal with the mess. So maybe before you start calling other countries poorly run, have a look at your own backyard, you spray-tanned aluminium siding salesman. The only thing poorly run in this picture is your fucking mouth. Credit (borrowed from) Jim Scroggins - original author ๐Ÿ“ท unknownโ€

ART
0
0
0
11