Féchos

966 posts

Féchos

Féchos

@Fechoss

Docteur en physique / membre de SeekSickSound / The Bass Society https://t.co/sHbPrVo0sA

가입일 Temmuz 2012
2.6K 팔로잉186 팔로워
MoMA Ready
MoMA Ready@moma_ready·
I’m building a comprehensive playlist of Electronic/Dance music focused Documentaries and interviews. What are some of your faves or ones you think I should see? 🤔
English
167
55
792
88.2K
Féchos
Féchos@Fechoss·
@talvezdelocura @Beniche c'est un peu le principe du film de jouer sur la vision qu'on a des femmes 'fortes' et du jugement qu'on en as. Jugement perso et proces de la femme tout ca quoi
Français
0
0
8
672
KiyoshiKurosawafancompte
KiyoshiKurosawafancompte@simonmagnytou·
La team j'aimerais voir des films français d'avant 1975 que vous considérez comme des chef-d'œuvre Des conseils ? Pas de godard, truffaut j'en ai vu pas mal.
Français
65
3
22
11.3K
Steven Touzard
Steven Touzard@StevenTouzard·
Première fois que je crois spotter une erreur dans une vidéo de @epenser ! (Ça veut dire qu'il est solide quand même) Il me semble que c'est Heaviside qui réduit les équations de Maxwell à 4 super élégantes. Il est d'ailleurs aussi autodidacte il me semble.
Français
1
0
4
4.6K
Féchos
Féchos@Fechoss·
@skdh Using less energy altogether is also necessary, whatever the scenario... in that way, carbon removal has been talked about specifically to confuse that (the same way carbon tax was )
English
0
0
0
35
Sabine Hossenfelder
Sabine Hossenfelder@skdh·
I've been working on a video about net zero -- what is it, how will we get there, how far are we along the way, etc. Just finished recording. Research has been extremely depressing. In an nutshell, every serious source (incl the IPCC) agrees that there's no way we'll reach net zero without substantial and fast investment into extensive carbon removal. We're talking about an increase by at least a factor 100 (!) by 2050. Yet this carbon removal doesn't even exist in plans. That's right, even if you add up all the plans that have been put forward -- which I'd say are a pie in the sky already -- it wouldn't work. The cherry on the rotten tart of net zero are environmental groups (infamously, Greenpeace) who are opposed to carbon capture and storage (CCS) at fossil fuel plants, and since most people can't tell the difference between CCS and carbon removal, it's getting in the way of net zero. Like with nuclear power, it's increasingly the so-called "environmentalists" who are in the way of protecting the environment. I'm not a fan of offshore drilling either, but complaining about CCS is broken logic. I'll have more details about this in the upcoming video (will be out in in a few weeks) but the more I think about it, the more I feel like the origin of this problem is presumably well-meaning activists (let's not name names) whose we-can-do-it attitude has made people think reaching net zero is much easier than it really is. These are all difficult topics with many nuances, but if I was in charge of running the world I'd quit. Sorry, I meant to say if I was in charge of running the world, my course of action would be: (a) Nuclear power everywhere it's geographically safe enough. I know that no one really likes nuclear power, but it's the least bad option to decarbonize energy intensive industry quickly. (b) Bio energy with carbon capture and storage everywhere there's large amounts of quickly re-growing biomass available, it would make sense for rich countries to finance such facilities elsewhere (c) Expand and modernize the electric grid asap because without that nothing else will work -- according to a recent IEA report there's 3000 GW (!) of renewable energy power plants waiting to be hooked up onto electric grids that can't cope (d) electric vehicles (the world is actually doing quite well with that one, if it wasn't for point (c)) (e) synthetic fuels produced with renewable energy -- it's energetically hugely inefficient but realistically the only way to decarbonize aviation quickly, you may want to do this in regions with reliable sunshine (Australia, Africa) The reason I didn't say anything about wind and solar is not that those are unimportant but that those are faict going fine. My twitter feed has been greatly enriched by @EliotJacobson who is as doom as doom gets which I think is the appropriate reaction in the current situation.
English
551
597
2.6K
484.8K
Ryley
Ryley@RyleyIsReal·
give me quiet albums you love. they do not have to be “ambient”. i am sick but have to work so i need something gentle to fill the space.
English
144
6
197
35.2K
Féchos
Féchos@Fechoss·
@kush_jones_ I move the master to a whole number for that reason sometimes
English
0
0
1
896
구종수
구종수@kush_jones_·
DJ math is randomly taking out your phone to calculate the bpm divided by 2.
Bronx, NY 🇺🇸 English
12
113
676
78.1K
Alex Klotz
Alex Klotz@AlexanderRKlotz·
Everything, Everywhere, All On One Plot
Alex Klotz tweet media
English
136
1.7K
10.7K
1.1M
maya benowitz 🕰️
maya benowitz 🕰️@cosmicfibretion·
mathematical formalism isn’t a substitute for guiding principles and physical intuition
English
15
16
152
17.9K
Féchos
Féchos@Fechoss·
@nephologue Also you cant bike 1000 km in a day so that helps lowering max kcal per day
English
0
0
1
108
Tim Garrett
Tim Garrett@nephologue·
Biking is more energy efficient than driving? Yes, but not obviously 🚴‍♀️: 7 kcal production energy per kcal consumed x 31 kcal biking energy per mile = 210 kcal/mile 🚗: 31,000 kcal per gal / (31 miles/gal) = 1000 kcal/mile Probably closer if you like meat and drive a SUV
English
10
0
11
2.7K
Féchos
Féchos@Fechoss·
@martinmbauer The problem is what it means to have expertise. In some fields, especially related to human behavior, like in economy, there are many beliefs intertwined with scientific content. Believing other people is the reason we are alive in most cases ,sure , but that depends on the field
English
0
0
0
54
Tim Garrett
Tim Garrett@nephologue·
@UCAIR_UT @RideUTA @TravelWiseUtah Heard biking emits more CO2 than cars because the fuel source - food - is essentially a fossil fuel product, and producing carbohydrates for burning in the body is highly inefficient compared to burning directly in an ICE. Probably why we choose to use ICEs in the first place
English
6
0
3
1K
Erin
Erin@IsItErin·
toutes les réponses disent que c'est de droite, à juste titre, et pourtant y'a une majorité de gens qui votent que c'est de gauche ??? y'a quoi qui va pas dans vos têtes ??? y'a rien de gauche dans les maths c'est un domaine rigoriste, élitiste et qui se base sur des problèmes➡️
@shilderi.bsky.social@shilderi

les maths

Français
13
1
17
11K
Michael Nielsen
Michael Nielsen@michael_nielsen·
What is the best history of the climate crisis? Ideally, a book as remarkable as Richard Rhodes' "The Making of the Atomic Bomb"
English
11
4
47
14.4K
Michael Nielsen
Michael Nielsen@michael_nielsen·
What’s the most wonderful textbook you’ve ever read?
English
338
125
896
427.9K
Deus ex Silicium
Deus ex Silicium@dexsilicium·
Pensez-vous qu'avec un ordinateur quantique de type IBM Osprey à 433 qubits, les 75 cases de ce tableau seraient notées "Instantly" ? 😉
Deus ex Silicium tweet media
Français
43
52
306
94.4K
Romain Herreros
Romain Herreros@Romain_Herreros·
J'ose espérer qu'il s'agit d'un dysfonctionnement. Parce que si on se met à douter de la véracité des informations données par les préfectures, ça devient grave huffingtonpost.fr/politique/arti…
Français
198
460
1.1K
357.8K
Féchos
Féchos@Fechoss·
@MaitreIndiscret En plus littéralement l'eau est salement verte à l'arrière plan de la photo
Français
0
0
0
44