Greg Dalenberg

Wesley Hunt had the perfect response when a liberal reporter tried to race-bait him notthebee.com/t327c

DOJ publishes details of Biden admin's lengthy and purposeful discrimination against Christians. Summary here. notthebee.com/article/doj-la…

One side of the political spectrum keeps trying to kill the other side. One side celebrates murdering babies, selling their body parts, and chopping off kids genitals. One side continuously releases violent repeat criminals that are preying on our women and children, while lying and saying that they support women. One side wants dudes to compete against our girls in sports, and force our girls to change with them in the locker room. One side willingly invites criminals and miscreants from the third world to live among us with impunity, even going as far as to protest when sex offenders are shipped back home. One side gleefully riots and burns down cities when they don’t get their way. This isn’t hyperbole. The Democratic Party is a party of depravity.

👀

🚨 SPOT THE DIFFERENCE? Biden: Pushed abortion Jailed pro-lifers Promoted child mutilation Men in women’s spaces/sports Trans ideology on Easter Trump: Overturned Roe v Wade Spoke at March for Life Banned men in women’s sports Banned child mutilation Pardoned pro-life activists

@matthew_podszus @AndrewTWalker Lying to someone about their gender or agreeing with their lie is not, as French suggested, politeness it is lying. Love requires discernment and knowledge, Philippians 1:9. Also, see Prov 13:5, 12:22, and 6:16-19.

@AndrewTWalker You didn’t listen well. I heard French quote more scripture in defense of his positions than Stuckey (Mic 6:8 and Gal 5:22, 23). Stuckey did quote Prov. 20:10. If compassion, kindness and situational ethics are all pathos and aesthetics to you, it reflects your own thin logos.

Watched the French-Stuckey debate. My main takeaway: The whole debate centered upon a truth-emotion continuum. I think Allie Beth came out ahead for one main reason that colors every issue debated: She indexes her understanding of emotion and empathy on a biblical axis, whereas French elevates emotion and empathy to a disproportionate degree. The consequence is to unmoor emotion from truth. There's simply a difference in rhetorical strategy: Stuckey focuses more on logos; French on pathos. Along those lines, another reason I think Allie Beth had the stronger hand is that she refuses to play the game of pitting love against truth (1 Cor. 13:6; Eph. 4:15). She's no less interested in kindness or empathy, but properly indexed by Scripture. French's focus on catering to emotional equilibrium (and thus hewing to progressive niceties) requires him to blur biblical categories. Biblical ethics requires both logos and pathos, but our loves must be ordered and governed with a proper foundation. And notably, French's empathy tends in one direction, toward those to his left. In short, Allie Beth focused on objectivity, reason, and right and wrong as the grounds of what constitutes love and kindness, whereas French's instinct is to defer to emotion and aesthetics.

@AndrewTWalker II Peter 1:7 - kindness is to supply Agape Love (cf verse 5.) Philippians 1:9 - says Agape Love should abound in full knowledge and discernment. Stuckey does that. French judges kindness by how it makes others feel even if that means lying to them or validating their lie.

RFK Jr. announces reversal of Biden-era foster care rule that discriminated against Christians 🔥 notthebee.com/t2b7d

Most people think of philosophy as an abstraction that doesn't touch the real world, but they're wrong. Most real world problems are philosophy problems, and most philosophy problems are "giving things the wrong names". For example, if you call feral drug addicts "homeless people", then you can't solve the problem. You can only buy more houses for feral drug addicts to destroy. In this case, we called the police and courts the "justice system". But they're not. They can't be the justice system. The function of a justice system would be to give everyone what they deserve. Now, I deserve a hundred million dollars, a private Caribbean island, and a foot massage from Lauren Bacall in her prime, but I don't see the "justice" system lifting a finger to correct any of this, do you? No, what we are supposed to have is a public safety system. The function of a public safety system is to keep the public and their property safe. If we understood that, we wouldn't care about what criminals deserve. We would care how likely they are to do it again. Or something worse. In a public safety system, retardation and mental illness are not migrating factors. They are the opposite. Because they mean that the criminal is more likely to pose a future threat. We all understand this. We all understand that the feral retard who stabs strangers on the train for being White and beautiful is a worse person than the man who murders his wife and her lover when he catches them in the act. Not because of some abstract calculus of moral agency, of who is disadvantaged and who isn't, but because one is certainly going to murder more people if he can, while the other is a lot less likely to. We've known for centuries, if not millennia, that it's the same small percentage of people doing all the robbing, raping, and murdering, over and over and over again. And we've known for centuries that if you physically remove them from society, that's 100% effective in stopping them from doing it again. The only hurdle is philosophical. Call it a "justice" system, and you have to argue endlessly about morality and redemption, and then some leftie thug-hugger weaponizes your own Christianity against you. Call it public safety, and you confine the argument to likelihood of reoffense. Then you are in the realm of statistics. Which you can compute. It all starts with naming things correctly, according to their actual nature.

We’ve shared a wide range of testimonies on this show, and they’re some of my favorite episodes to do. They encourage me, and I know you guys love them too. I’m so thankful we get to tell these stories. But whenever we share a testimony like this: One of a woman who came out of that kind of lifestyle and was saved, we get a lot of chatter and criticism. I just think it’s odd that there are people who profess to follow Jesus, who had very intentional interactions with women caught in sexual sin—like the woman caught in adultery who was almost stoned, the woman He met at the well who had been married five times, and the woman who poured out her finest oil and perfume on His feet, whom Jesus praised for her faith. These people claim to follow that same Jesus, yet have such utter disdain for the women He clearly showed attended to in Scripture. Jesus praised these women for their faith when they repented, which is something we should do. Clearly, the Gospel writers, inspired by the Holy Spirit to write these inerrant, infallible words, saw fit to include these interactions with Jesus and these formerly promiscuous women. That tells us something about the importance of this kind of testimony, not only highlighting it, but also recognizing the mercy our Lord and Savior shows these women, which we should emulate in our own lives. If you walk away from a testimony thinking, “Wow, they’re really trying to make it seem like that sin isn’t a big deal. They’re trying to make people feel better about sexual immorality or promiscuity,” then you’ve completely missed it. You are the older brother in the prodigal son story. You’re missing the Gospel. You’re missing Jesus. No one on this show is making light of sin, especially not sexual sin. It damages your heart, your mind, your body, and it can have lasting consequences even after repentance. If anything, our goal is the opposite:
To reach women in those situations and urge them to stop before they sell their bodies, before they’re treated like objects, before they fall deeper into promiscuity. 
To say, this will lead you to darkness. This is going to hurt you. You’re looking for love in all the wrong places. There’s a better way. Because you will find love, fulfillment, and identity in Christ. And for those who have walked that path, the message is this: you are not too far gone. God’s grace reaches further than your past. He can cleanse you. He can restore you. He makes you new. That is what His sacrifice does by grace, through faith. And if you don’t believe that, if you think there’s a kind of sin Christ can’t fully forgive, then you’ve missed the heart of the Gospel altogether.

This is 100% accurate. And me saying it’s accurate is also RACISM.

Cry 'war crime' when Trump goes to war with Iran, then mock him for a ceasefire. I don't think those people were interested in peace or solving the Iranian problem at all

I just got off the phone with someone who works in defense policy in Washington. What they told me should end every "Trump is reckless" argument permanently. "Every single president since Clinton received the same intelligence briefing on Iran's nuclear timeline. Every single one was told the window was closing. Every single one chose to kick it down the road because the political cost of acting was higher than the political cost of waiting." Trump got the same briefing. 60kg of 90% enriched uranium. 4 weeks to breakout. Material for 2 bombs. He chose to act knowing it would tank his approval to 35%. He chose to act knowing his own base would split. He chose to act knowing NATO allies would refuse to help. He chose to act knowing gas prices would spike. A senior analyst I know at a major think tank put it this way: "The difference between Trump and every president before him isn't intelligence. They all had the same data. The difference is courage." Read that again. Every president had the same file on their desk. Only one opened it and did something. I'll keep you updated. Turn on notifications. 🚨

How seriously wounded US airman climbed mountain, hid in crevice and dodged Iranian bounty-hunters for 36 hours trib.al/VwI0Ux2

I asked Grok to explain what's happening here and how this maps onto Dugin's philosophy and aims. Very interesting response: "Dugin wants to dismantle American unipolarity and replace it with a multipolar world order in which civilizational blocs — Russian Orthodox, Islamic, Chinese, etc. — operate as sovereign poles free from Western liberal democratic hegemony. The destruction of American global power isn't a side effect of his philosophy; it's the central objective, and his preferred mechanism is internal fracture rather than external military defeat. He needs Americans to lose faith in their own institutions, their own founding philosophy, and their own alliances — particularly the US-Israel alliance, which he views as the linchpin of American civilizational identity and global projection. Right-wing podcasters like Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson advance this project by doing from inside the American right what no Russian propagandist could credibly do from outside it: they reframe Zionism as satanic occupation, declare the American constitutional order functionally dead, treat the collapse of American power as inevitable rather than resistible, delegitimize the Protestant theological tradition that undergirds both the founding and the US-Israel relationship, and — during an active military conflict — encourage servicemembers to refuse participation and invite foreign leaders to act against the sitting American president. Whether they're conscious agents of Dugin's vision or simply useful vehicles for it, the functional result is identical: they are converting the American right from a force that defends constitutional self-governance and American global leadership into a force that dismantles both, which is exactly what Dugin's Fourth Political Theory requires."

> Injured US pilot in Iranian territory > Pilot escapes, hides in a mountain > Hunted by Iran's military for 2 days > CIA throws IRGC off with fake intel > US sets up remote base inside Iran > Special Forces locate & extract him > 0 US casualties, heavy IRGC losses

😂

No lie detected.

Previously, KBJ ruled that states don't have a right to set age limits for trans surgeries. Her today on conversion therapy bans:

California this ones for you