Hāshir-ul-Ummah حاشر الأمة

I’m no expert on religion, but John seems to be doing his best to describe “sharia law,” even if he makes some mistakes along the way. I believe he means well.

من أصدق ما سمعت .

تريد أن تفهم موقف أهل السنة والجماعة من الإمام الغزالي بوضوح واختصار؟ إليك خلاصة ما قاله الشيخ يوسف الغفيص في ميزان (العدل والإنصاف).

@TheInfamousRG @meowbundi A supposed Salafiyy is laughing here! Assim Al-Hakeem is a borderline Madkhaliyy so the red herring fallacy doesn't even work.

@meowbundi 🤣

All these books, and then a salafi comes and says: "but assim al-hakeem thinks.."

@meowbundi @IbnMalikah 0 argument; your strawman nonsense assumes we ought to judge schools by laymen's errors. Abu Layth is a modernist going against the ijma3 of past scholars.

@IbnMalikah i accept the condition assim represent salafism and mufti abu layth represents me.

"تنظيم ربيع المدخلي السلفي!!" مقال سابق للأخ #سالم_الطويل يبين أن ربيع المدخلي عنده تنظيم "مجلس شورى عالمي سلفي" يصدر الأوامر ويعين ويأمر وينهى..نظام حزبي.. ومنه شخصيات كويتية!! وفيه هاني بريك صاحب موقف سلبي من بعض دول خليجية في موضوع #اليمن! فهل هذه المعلومات حقيقية؟ هل هناك تنظيم "مدخلي" عابر للحدود الكويتية وفيه شخصيات من بلدنا!؟ شرايك؟ إذا عندك معلومة؟ إذا تفيدنا أخوي بوضرار كونك ملم وخبير @Meshal_Alnami saltaweel.com/articles/477

الغيرة‼️ #حتى_لا_ننسى_الأنصاري #الحريه_للدكتور_عبدالعزيز_الخزرج_الأنصاري

@WahyunYuha Is the aboveness of Allah from mutashabihat? Yes or no, please?

@Hashirulummah youtu.be/0VwGHOehLG8?si…

The "Ahl Sunnah" should really avoid discussing Mutashabihaat: youtu.be/0VwGHOehLG8

@WahyunYuha I'm asking you: is Allah spatially over His Throne and Creation?

@WahyunYuha That itself is a nonsensical bid3ah innovated by Mu'tazilah. The Sahabah themselves believed in it. Ijma' is just the scope of Islam that's agreed upon by any generation of scholars, and we know Allah has declared the Ummah to be collectively infallible.

@Hashirulummah A short snippet series of various examples of why Ijma' is invalid: youtube.com/playlist?list=…

The Salaf's real ijma' was: don't follow us. So if you actually want to follow the Salaf, stop following the Salaf. Explained Here: 👇👇👇 youtu.be/iZzehoFTaZY

Pour avoir été un repenti de la salafiya / madkhaliya — sans généraliser bien sûr, mais majoritairement — ce sont de mauvaises personnes, parce que ce prêche-là est basé sur la haine. C'est basé sur le fait de détester autrui. Il n'y a pas de spiritualité. On va t'apprendre les trois fondements et le Kitab at-Tawhid en dix ans, mais on va rarement t'apprendre la piété, l'amour pour tes frères ou la bienfaisance.

@WahyunYuha Ibn Al-Mundhir was Shafi3iyy, not Dhāhiriyy! He may have reached complete ijtihād later on.

Influencers and commentators in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have taken to social media to denounce the Bondi Beach terror attacks, referencing the same talking points as many Israeli commentators

مفتي عام المملكة الفوزان يحذف جميع فتاويه و مواقعه وحساباته الرسمية من الانترنت alfawzan.af.org.sa حسابه ومتابعيه كان مقارب المليون في تويتر وتجاوز المليون في قناة يوتيوب تم حذفها جميعاً ١١٧٨٣ فتوى ١٩٤٤ درس ١٨٤ خطبة جمعة ٥٧٨ محاضرة

Is Ahmed Al Sharaa a product of the CIA, Mossad, or MI6? Attributing every unexpected political outcome to shadowy intelligence agencies, is uncle analysis that needs to die. It’s a very lazy shortcut that replaces complexity with conspiracy which consistently fails to explain how the world actually works. There is no credible evidence that Ahmed Al Sharaa is a manufactured asset of Western intelligence. What does exist is a well-documented trajectory: he rose through jihadist networks, became a leading figure in Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), consolidated power locally, and repositioned himself politically when circumstances demanded it. That evolution is not unusual and mirrors patterns seen in multiple conflict zones where armed actors transition into political ones when survival requires it. Lebanon is a great example. Relying on statements like Donald Trump claiming he “made” Al Sharaa president only weakens the argument. Trump has a long record of making exaggerated or contradictory geopolitical claims, such as declaring total victories or assigning credit without basis. Trump also said: Turkey won in Syria when Al Sharaa won. The truth is, nobody in the West likes the outcome of Syria, especially not Israel, their internal media doesn’t lie, they hate him and want him gone. So why is the West engaging with Al Sharaa at all? Because they have limited options. The comparison to the Taliban is instructive. The West spent two decades fighting them, only to end up negotiating and ultimately accepting their control of Afghanistan. Not because they supported them but because they couldn’t replace them with anything more viable. Power on the ground matters more than ideological preference. The same logic applies in Syria. HTS is not a conventional state actor that can be easily coerced through bombing or sanctions alone. Groups like this are decentralised, ideologically driven, and often operate with minimal infrastructure. Military pressure can weaken them, but it rarely produces stable alternatives. In fact, history shows the opposite: destroying one dominant faction without a political plan often creates space for something more extreme,ISIS being the clearest example. Al Sharaa appears to have recognised this reality from the other side. By softening his posture and signaling willingness to engage, he is attempting to move from isolation toward legitimacy because sanctions, economic collapse, and perpetual war are unsustainable. That’s not proof of foreign control but it’s just proof of political adaptation. What we are seeing isnt an alliance but convergence of necessity. The West does not trust Al Sharaa. Al Sharaa does not align ideologically with the West. But both sides understand that continued chaos in Syria benefits no one: it fuels extremism, destabilises the region, and prolongs humanitarian disaster. Engagement, however uneasy, becomes the least bad option. Geopolitics is not a story of heroes and villains and puppets and puppet masters. It’s a constant negotiation between constraints, risks, and grey choices. States don’t get to pick ideal partners, they deal with whoever holds power and can influence outcomes. Right now, the West’s objective is limited: prevent Syria from collapsing further, avoid the resurgence of transnational jihadist threats, and, if possible, nudge the country toward a more stable and economically viable trajectory. That doesn’t require belief in Al Sharaa, it only requires acknowledging reality.

🟢دفاع الشيخ عبد الكريم الخضير عن الشيخ ابن جبرين بعد هجوم غلاة التجريح عليه 🔷هل تنصحنا بالأخذ من الشيخ عبد الله بن جبرين ؟ ⛔️هؤلاء من قطاع الطريق 🎙مقطع صوتي ↩️الشيخ #عبدالكريم_الخضير حفظه الله #صوت_العلماء #قناة_السلفية #الجواب_الكافي #غلاة_التجريح #غلاة_التبديع #مقالات_الفوزان #الجرح_والتعديل

Murray: Is it true that people making under $184k pay a 12.4% Social Security tax rate? Dahl: Yes Murray: And the rate for someone making $1 million? Dahl: 2.2% Murray: So, a 12.4% tax for people making less than $184k, but 2.2% for a millionaire or .0002% for billionaires.

“I am certain that if the Emirati government took us to Jahannam, they’d bring us back safely.” — UAE politics advisor Abdul Khaliq Abdullah