Health Feedback

285 posts

Health Feedback banner
Health Feedback

Health Feedback

@HealthFeedback

Scientists from around the world sorting fact from fiction in health media coverage. Project of @ScienceFeedback @[email protected]

가입일 Eylül 2018
511 팔로잉1.7K 팔로워
Health Feedback 리트윗함
Science Feedback
Science Feedback@ScienceFeedback·
1/Why are detox juices so popular? Influencers across social media platforms claim that parasites are common and that regular detoxes with juices or alternative medicine are needed. 🧃 #DetoxMyth #PublicHealth
Science Feedback tweet media
English
4
1
1
308
Health Feedback 리트윗함
John Barbieri, MD, MBA
John Barbieri, MD, MBA@DrJohnBarbieri·
The potential for benzoyl peroxide to break down into benzene, particularly when exposed to high temperatures, is concerning. However, we need complete data transparency from Valisure (e.g. appropriate storage conditions) and we also need to be thoughtful about absolute risk.
Health Feedback@HealthFeedback

Reports of high levels of #benzene —a cancer-causing chemical— in skincare products have generated concern and fear But the viral claim that these products can cause cancer isn’t substantiated by evidence. We explain why. Reviewed w/ @DrJohnBarbieri science.feedback.org/review/insuffi…

English
1
3
10
2.8K
Health Feedback
Health Feedback@HealthFeedback·
“Disease X” has sparked a number of conspiracy theories, such as the imminent arrival of a new, man-made pandemic In reality, it merely refers to a possible pathogen of pandemic potential that may emerge Learn more about it and pandemic preparedness: science.feedback.org/disease-x-how-…
English
5
0
1
242
Health Feedback 리트윗함
NewsGuard
NewsGuard@NewsGuardRating·
New: NewsGuard found ads for dozens of major brands unintentionally appearing below viral posts on X advancing false or egregiously misleading claims about the Israel-Hamas war newsguardtech.com/misinformation…
English
117
306
772
301.6K
Health Feedback 리트윗함
Viki Male
Viki Male@VikiLovesFACS·
@RetsefL The paper you’re quoting shows that the trace amounts of vaccine found in some people’s breast milk up to 48h post-vaccination (and which we have known about since 2021) is not functional.
Viki Male@VikiLovesFACS

In some ppl, trace amounts of #CovidVaccine mRNA are found in #breastmilk up to 48h post-vaccination. But is this mRNA functional? 👉🏻 75 - 88% of it not in tact 👉🏻 Spike protein not detected 👉🏻 Gut cells given milk mRNA do not make spike protein 🧵… thelancet.com/action/showPdf…

English
23
13
121
15K
Health Feedback 리트윗함
Science Feedback
Science Feedback@ScienceFeedback·
The X/Twitter account LeadingReport has served as the springboard into virality for false claims about COVID-19 and vaccines This investigation identifies its owners & uncovers their history of spreading misinformation science.feedback.org/who-is-behind-…
English
9
7
10
1.4K
Health Feedback 리트윗함
The Nobel Prize
The Nobel Prize@NobelPrize·
The discoveries by Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman – awarded the 2023 #NobelPrize in Physiology or Medicine – were critical for developing effective mRNA vaccines against COVID-19 during the pandemic that began in early 2020. Through their groundbreaking findings, this year’s laureates have fundamentally changed our understanding of how mRNA interacts with our immune system. They have contributed to the unprecedented rate of vaccine development during one of the greatest threats to human health in modern times.
The Nobel Prize tweet media
English
179
1.9K
6.3K
994.5K
Health Feedback 리트윗함
Rachel Schraer
Rachel Schraer@rachelschraer·
Russell Brand built a new fanbase on YouTube in recent years, primed to mistrust the mainstream and come to his defence. A seductive soup of half-truths, real concerns and falsehoods gained him this much larger audience bbc.co.uk/news/uk-668426…
English
317
86
350
67.8K
Health Feedback 리트윗함
Andrew Revkin 🌎 ✍🏼 🪕 ☮️
Yes to this critique of @joerogan's #debatebobby call from @drskyskull: "In order for a debate to actually be worthwhile, both participants must be sincerely dedicated to finding the truth; if one side is not committed to the truth, they will have an advantage, because it is much easier to spout falsehoods than it is to refute them." Resonates with @AndrewDessler's latest post on the debating science (as distinct from policy), and he makes this valuable added point about the goals of those committed to a cause more than the truth (climate context): "It’s important to understand that the contrarian may not even be trying to win the debate. Rather, the goal of those opposed to climate policy is often to merely establish the existence of a debate and use this to argue that 'more research is needed'." theclimatebrink.substack.com/p/the-science-… Also read @BrandyZadrozny's disturbing look at @RobertKennedyJr's presidential-race logic: "The conspiracy candidate: What RFK Jr.’s anti-vaccine crusade could look like in the White House" yahoo.com/lifestyle/cons…
Adam Frank@AdamFrank4

This is an excellent point. The performative debates that some folks on social media want to see are simply not how science does it’s work.

English
7
7
14
4K
Health Feedback 리트윗함
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea@jonathanstea·
Whether the topic is: - Climate change - GMOs - Nuclear power - Vaccines - Homeopathy - Astronomy - Evolution - or Covid-19... ...People who disagree most with the scientific consensus know less about the topic, but they think they know more. science.org/doi/10.1126/sc…
English
349
836
3.1K
415.3K
Health Feedback 리트윗함
Greg Tucker-Kellogg (gtuckerkellogg.bsky.social)
Request for help: I've devoted my @YouTube channel to fighting misinformation, but YouTube wrongly removed a video of mine (and rejected the appeal in less time than it would take to view the video itself) claiming it was *promoting* medical misinformation. @TeamYouTube 1/3
Greg Tucker-Kellogg (gtuckerkellogg.bsky.social) tweet media
English
23
15
69
24.8K