David Davidoff 🇩🇪🇮🇱🇺🇦

Since end of 1930th USSR leadership knew it was dangerous for birth rates, and reversed the policy. At the beginning of the Soviet era 1917-1935, special campaigns were organized for women to master 'unwomanly' professions. This included work in agriculture, for instance the 'Everyone to the tractor' campaign, in industrial production, and even in the mining business, There was an unprecedented involvement of women in male professions, specifically in the field of heavy industry. All of this led to a situation in the 1930s where, on average, there was less than 1 child per woman. (discontinuation of contraceptive production, prohibition of abortions, increase in financial assistance to young mothers, etc.). The growing Soviet state perceived this as a critical situation. A rollback began towards 'traditional values'. At the same time, end of 1930 when the movement was recognized as harmful and dangerous, it was decided to promotre those ideas in the West, to give USSR an edge. It was done In the form of consequent support to the Marxist Feminism movements. Mao Zedoung have left Moscow 1920-1935 before that, and did not catch the change. Quick Fact: Due to West beinf cought in "" current birth rates in USA and Europe are plummering and are will inevitably lead to collapse of the pension system. and now close to the numbers of USSR 1930. 1.7 in US, 1.2 in Europe.

@EGoldstein_06 @uxm1ke @superchelich @KobarLeaflen16 @BohuslavskaKate That's a movie you retard. Goolden Horde was 300 years later than any of those.

Anna Yaroslavna — Queen of France — was from Kyiv. Daughter of Yaroslav the Wise, Prince of Kyiv. She was not "Russian" because "Russia" as we know it did not exist. Her father ruled (Kyivan) Rus, not Moscovia, and definitely not "Russia." Let’s clean this up: ✅ Her title was "Anna of Rus’" — Rus’ means Kyivan Rus, the state with its capital in Kyiv. ✅ In French sources: "Reine de Russie" is a later translation error. Medieval sources used "de Rus'," not "Russia." ✅ Moscow was an unknown swamp in her time. Moscow first mentioned: 1147, Anna’s reign: 1051–1075. Moscow didn’t even exist. ✅ "Russia" as a political term was invented 600 years later, by Peter I in 1721. ✅ Her church books, signatures, and letters are in Old Ruthenian (proto-Ukrainian), not Muscovite dialect. ✅ Her father Yaroslav the Wise signed diplomatic treaties as ruler of Ruthenians, not "Russians." Conclusion: Anna of Kyiv, Princess of Ruthenia, daughter of Kyivan Rus. Zero connection to "Russia," because Russia did not exist. This is stolen history propaganda. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruthenians

Because at that time, Russia (or Russiae) on old European maps referred to Ruthenia, the Latin name for the Kyivan Rus' lands — not Moscovia. helmink.com/zoom/18761 The term "Ruthenia" (Latinized form of Rus) was used in medieval and early modern Europe to describe the East Slavic lands, particularly those under the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, corresponding to modern Ukraine and Belarus (Wikipedia: Ruthenia). Meanwhile, "Muscovy" referred specifically to the Grand Duchy of Moscow, a distinct political entity by the 16th century. There was inconsistent use of terminology. But quality sources or instance, Abraham Ortelius's 1570 map, "Russiae, Moscoviae et Tartariae Descriptio," based on Anthony Jenkinson's 1562 map, is titled "Description of Russia, Muscovy, and Tartary," suggesting a categorization (Library of Congress: Ortelius Atlas). Jenkinson's map, covering from the Gulf of Finland to Central Asia, included regions like Lithuania, Latvia, and parts of modern Ukraine, likely labeled as part of "Lithuania" or "Ruthenia" due to their political control by the Grand Duchy of Lithuania at the time (Anthony Jenkinson’s unique wall map of Russia (1562)). Further, maps like Gerard Mercator's 1638 map (technically 17th century but close to the period) labeled parts of Ukraine with toponyms like "Taurica Chersonesus," "Tartaria Przecopensis," "Kioff" (Kyiv), and "Podolia," indicating specific regional names rather than a unified "Russia" (KBR: Ukraine's Geopolitical History in 10 Old Maps). 15th–16th century European cartographers wrote Russiae or Ruthenia for Kyiv, Galicia, Volhynia. Moscovia was always marked separately. Even Venetian and German maps clearly differentiate: Moscovia is northeast, Russiae (Ruthenia) is centered around Kyiv. Only after Moscovia expanded and conquered Ruthenian lands did they start calling themselves "Rus" to absorb the legacy. They never called themselves "Russia" untill 1721. And it was eacactly because there was a misconception on how to call them now in the west, they named themselves "Russia" in the 1721. In short: on old european maps, "Russiae" = Kyiv-centered Rus'; Self name = Rus. not Russia. "Moscovia" = separate Muscovite state hijacked the name Rus, and then renamed it to Russia oicially.

@uxm1ke @superchelich @KobarLeaflen16 @BohuslavskaKate

This post is russian cultural appropriation in a nutshell. Anna, the daughter of Yaroslav the Wise, was Ukrainian. She lived in an era when the area now called russia was an uninhabited swamp. Yet, after appropriating the name of Kyivan Rus, russians now appropriate historical figures too.

@MuellerOnyx @uxm1ke @welt Das klingt fast danach, als würde man ins lauwarme Wasser furzen. Und riecht wahrscheinlich genau so. 😂 Null, nichts Argument. x.com/MuellerOnyx/st…

@uxm1ke @welt Langweilen sie nicht mit ihrem Floskelgelaber. Die eingeübten Sprüchlein haben schon tausend Andere vor ihnen aufgesagt.

„Spannend ist die Frage, warum Trump genau jetzt eingestiegen ist“ to.welt.de/DyVMkqu

@visegrad24 That's stupid @McDonalds last I checked, Germany was not a Muslim nation. 5.5% of the total population. So, why would the American fast-food chain remove food images from its outdoor advertising during the daylight hours if your food isn't even halal in Germany to begin with?

🇩🇪 McDonald's in Germany has removed food images from its billboards during daylight hours for Ramadan. What do you think about this?

@visegrad24 Which one of them is british?

Demographic distribution of Child Sexual Abuse and Exploitation suspects in Operation Stovewood: 64% — 🇵🇰 Pakistanis 22% — 🇬🇧 British 9% — 🌍 Other 2% — 🇾🇪 Yemenis 2% — ❓Unknown 1% — 🇸🇰 Slovaks Source: British Home Office

@TheJasonNichols @ConceptualJames 1D, not 2D. (Another mathematician here)

@ConceptualJames lol, yeah. I was thinking '2 directions' but yes, lines are 2D. :)

Yes, Woke Right is on the Left, kinda like this. That's why I've been calling it the "Right Hand of the Left" for a lot longer than I have been calling it the "Woke Right."

@SiggiKrey @Starlink Ey du Heuchler, dich juckt die Umwelt null Komma null – sonst würdest du jetzt mit ’nem Plakat vor der chinesischen Botschaft stehen und „Fick Xi“ brüllen. Du hasst die Reichen einfach, weil dein eigener Kontostand aussieht wie ’ne Obdachlosen-Sammeldose nach ’nem Bankraub.

@Starlink Musk hat mittlerweile 9 Tasusend Satteliten im All!Eindach so .weil Er das kann!Mit Dinald ging alles !Verdienen.Orbit vermüllen .Umwelt schädigen mit Fracking ihne Suflagen Bürger in den USA sind entsetzt . Eine Umwelt wird vernichtet auf Jahre !und die Bewohner sind arm dran!

Sorgen Sie für eine schnelle zuverlässige Internetverbindung für Streaming, Videoanrufe, Online-Gaming und vieles mehr. In wenigen Minuten online bestellen.

@AegeritalMike1 @uxm1ke @chico_ray @DeedleFake None of it is true.

My geopolitical sanity check: —You stand with Israel against Hamas. —You stand with Ukraine against Russian aggression. —You stand with the people of Iran against the Islamic regime. I don’t even mind if you’re agnostic about these, to a point. But once you start siding with Hamas, Russia and the Islamic regime purposely… I genuinely think you’re insane.

Vienna city councilor Aslıhan Bozatemur from the ruling social democrats says her party will keep blocking the construction of a once promised statue to King John III Sobieski who led the forces that defeated the Ottoman siege of Vienna in 1683. On Instagram, she wrote: “There’s no place in Vienna for a monument that encourages xenophobia, Islamophobia and anti-Turkish sentiment”. 🇦🇹🇹🇷🇵🇱

#noDigitalID #BundID und #EUDigitalIdentityWallet haben nur einen Zweck. Viele Vorwände, aber nur ein Zweck. Kontrolle. Es ist dafür gebaut, dich zu erfassen, zu sortieren, zu filtern und am Ende zentral zu steuern. Wir brauchen keine DigitalID. Wir brauchen Freiheit.

@PIRATEN_Saar Seid ihr Piraten oder die Linken? Statt persönlicher Verantwortung wollt ihr BigTech politisch kontrollieren. Das ist die gleiche linksglobalistische #DigitalID Zensur-Scheiße wie immer.

Statt Jugendlichen mit einem Social Media Verbot den Zugang zu digitalen Räumen zu nehmen, müssen wir BigTech in die Verantwortung nehmen. Man trifft die Nutzer, nicht Konzerne, die mit manipulativen Algorithmen & Datenhunger die Plattformen steuern. #PIRATEN #Presseclub

@HillelNeuer ".‘But Nazi, Nazi, Nazi’ - I don't think people have any idea what Nazi is. Nazi built schools, autobahn, hospitals. It's critical you understand, when you think of Nazi, do not think of throat cutters, armed to the teeth, fighters. It's not like that.."💀

“People say ‘But Hamas, Hamas, Hamas’ — I don't think people have any idea what Hamas is. Hamas built schools, public facilities, hospitals. It's critical you understand, when you think of Hamas, do not think of throat cutters, armed to the teeth, fighters. It's not like that...”

@uxm1ke @JosephCaruth @forallcurious They say it when they're unable to articulate their problem with factual reality.

@JosephCaruth @forallcurious

🚨: A man was discovered with 90% of his brain mass missing, and yet he was living a perfectly normal life.

🚨⚡️ Skandalös. 🚨⚡️ Die ÖRR @tagesschau „berichtet“ über die #MSC2026 Rede von US-Staatssekretär Marco Rubio. Die Videoberichterstattung dauert 8 Minuten und 19 Sekunden, davon wird von der eigentlichen 20-minütigen Rede nur 1 Minute gezeigt. In dieser Minute schafft es der ÖRR, ein unzufriedenes Gesicht aus dem Publikum einzublenden. Anstelle Rubio selbst sprechen zu lassen, schwadroniert Reporter Stephan Stuchlik weitere 7 Minuten lang und erfindet frei irgendwelche „zwischen den Zeilen“ gelesenen Märchen, die Marco Rubio nie gesagt hat. „Er wollte das Wohlwollen des Saals haben, das hat er aber nicht bekommen.“ (In Wirklichkeit gab es für Rubio am Ende stehende Ovationen. Siehe das Video.) „Europa – ohne die USA – das wäre zwischen den Zeilen zu lesen – ausgeschmissen.“ frei erfunden. „Ohne die USA wäre die Welt ausgeschmissen“, sagt eine weitere frei erfundene Unsinns-Aussage des Reporters. „Europa und die USA haben unterschiedliche Blickwinkel auf die Politik“ – hat Rubio nie gesagt. „Er hat noch mal aufgezählt, was die USA alles an Konflikten erledigt hätten, er hat gesagt, den Krieg in der Ukraine hätten andere beenden können, das war mit Sicherheit der Fingerzeig auf die Europäer.“ In Wirklichkeit hat Marco Rubio über die UNO gesprochen. O-Ton Marco Rubio: „Zum Beispiel haben die Vereinten Nationen weiterhin ein enormes Potenzial, ein Werkzeug zum Guten in der Welt zu sein. Aber wir können nicht ignorieren, dass sie heute bei den drängendsten Fragen vor uns keine Antworten hat und praktisch keine Rolle gespielt hat. Sie konnte den Krieg in Gaza nicht lösen. Stattdessen war es amerikanische Führung, die Geiseln aus den Händen von Barbaren befreite und einen fragilen Waffenstillstand ermöglichte. Sie hat den Krieg in der Ukraine nicht gelöst.“ Dann macht Stuchlik weiter: „Es ging bis zu Venezuela, und dann hat man schon den kleinen Zucken im Saal gemerkt.“ Vor oder nach den stehenden Ovationen hatte Herr Stuchlik enen Zuken? „Dann hat er gesagt, was Donald Trump vorhin gesagt hat … Die USA fühlen sich von Europäern betrogen.“ Einfach frei erfunden. „was Multietnizismus bedeutet von USA abgelehnt werden“ – frei erfunden, nie gesagt. Da tauscht der Reporter auch bewusst „Multikulturalismus“ ein. Die USA sind selbst multiethnisch, aber multikulturell heißt etwas komplett anderes. „hat man Anspannung gemerkt“ – frei erfunden „gesagt wie unabhängig sich die USA fühlen“ – frei erfunden „er hat kein einziges Mal NATO erwähnt“ – Rubio sprach explizit von transatlantischen Bündniss (NATO), starken Partnern und Militärausgaben. „US could lead alone, das hat er gesagt und das haben viele im Saal als Drohung gefunden“. Hat er natürlich nie gesagt. Was er gesagt hat, war (4:50): „Under President Trump, the United States of America will once again take on the task of renewal and restoration, driven by a vision of a future as proud, as sovereign, and as vital as our civilization's past. And while we are prepared, if necessary, to do this alone, it is our preference and it is our hope to do this together with you, our friends here in Europe.“ „es hätte nicht die Möglichkeit bestanden, dass ein Nato-Partner möglicherweise das Territorium des anderen Nato-Partners beanspruchen will“ – Türkei-Griechenland, hallo? „wer sind die Partner von USA … da hat es keine Verklärung gegeben, sondern mehrere Fragezeichen“ Ist es eine Berichterstattung, oder Missinformation und Meinungsmanipulation? ÖRR Journalismus. @OERRBlog Bitte Teilen.

@xavimunty064599 @uxm1ke fee.org.es/articulos/no-s…

@uxm1ke En España tenemos mucha experiencia con esta BASURA, los hemos soportado demasiado tiempo. Tú dile a alguno de estos que son de "izquierda"... te arrancarían la cabeza

The premise collapses because it assumes that ideological labels function like mutually exclusive technical categories. They do not. Political movements fight inside the same ideological family all the time. In Germany, the conflict between the National Socialist German Workers' Party and parties like the Social Democratic Party of Germany or the Communist Party of Germany was not a debate over whether socialism should exist. It was a fight over what the groups/classes will be, who controlled it, and how power should be organized. National Socialism kept core socialist elements: Rejection of liberal capitalism Subordination of private property to the state Central economic direction Primacy of the collective over the individual It rejected Marxist internationalism and replaced class struggle with racial struggle. That does not make it non socialist. It makes it a nationalist, racial variant of socialism. The Bolshevik versus Menshevik split shows the same pattern. Bolsheviks vs Mensheviks Both factions came out of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party. Both read Marx. Both aimed at socialism. Their disagreement was strategic and structural: Mensheviks wanted a broad mass party and gradual development Bolsheviks under Vladimir Lenin wanted a disciplined vanguard party and immediate seizure of power Both were socialist. One believed history would mature into socialism. The other believed it had to be accepted. Internal conflict does not disprove ideological identity. It proves power struggles inside an ideological framework. After reading various Socialist from Engsoc to Maoists, from Marx to Marcuse you find that socialism adopted with recurring themes: History is class conflict Capitalism must be abolished Private control of the means of production is illegitimate, State should do it. The individual is secondary to historical necessity From that foundation, multiple interpretations emerge: 1. International revolutionary socialism 2. Nationally socialism 3. Slow (Democratic) socialism 4. Authoritarian vanguard socialism They share the collectivist premise. They diverge on method, identity framing, and timing. Ideological movements fracture because once the individual is subordinated to an abstract collective, the decisive question becomes: who defines the collective and who wields power in its name? That is why socialist factions fight each other. The same happened with Jacobins versus other revolutionaries in the French Revolution. Shared ideology does not prevent internal purges. It often intensifies them. The contradiction is not that one side was not socialist. The contradiction is built into revolutionary collectivism itself: if history is moving toward a single necessary outcome, whoever claims to interpret that necessity will eliminate rivals as traitors. That pattern repeats. Different branches. Same collectivist root. Read Hayek about it.

@xavimunty064599 @uxm1ke Ignoramus. fee.org.es/articulos/no-s…

@uxm1ke Mejor edúcate tu, analfabeto fascistoide, en mi país ya vivimos esto y sabemos que lo que hablamos

@xavimunty064599 @uxm1ke x.com/ConceptualJame…

@xavimunty064599 @uxm1ke That's bullshit. Both National Socialists and Soviet Bolsheviks were initially sponsored by big industrialists. 😂 Before WW2, the National Socialists were also sponsored by the Union of Soviet Socialist Reublics. The FACT is secret protocols to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.