小鸟在歌唱

@IvanValente Hello professor, why don't you learn a little bit of history of Socialist Countries, instead of imagining a utopia out of thin air?

Tem algo muito errado no mundo e o nome é Capitalismo! Chegamos ao ponto de um só homem, Elon Musk, possuir UM TRILHÃO de dólares. Uma pessoa tem mais dinheiro que 46% da população mundial. O capitalismo só gera concentração de renda e violência. Socialismo, pense nisso!

@bbbrezenski You think you'll become a Robin Hood, but in reality, when you get the power to decide other people's wealth, you'll certainly turn into another Pol Pot, Stalin, Chairman Mao. Please read more about the history of Communist Countries.

O escarro do capitalismo. Um homem trilionário num mundo onde 700 milhões de pessoas passam fome. Se a gente pegasse 1 trilhão de dólares e desse para essas 700 milhões de pessoas, cada uma receberia 7 mil reais. Da pra comer né? Isso de um único homem. Um herdeiro com informação e contatos privilegiados do seu pai e que nunca nem estudar precisou, só continuar usando o privilégio e roubando os feitos dos seus funcionários. Elon Musk ao contrário de Bill Gates e Steve Jobs, não é um gênio, ele contrata gênios e fica com o crédito. É só mais um capitalista do fim do mundo que vive grudado nas tetas governamentais como todos os capitalistas fazem. Estado fraco para os pobres e forte para eles.

@whyyoutouzhele 粉蛆不在乎“家丑”，它们只在乎是否“外扬”

3元一瓶的绿茶竟然是盲人大叔的梦想 近日，一名博主在街头采访一位独居盲人老人。当被问及有什么梦想时，老人沉默片刻后表示，天气炎热，自己其实很想喝一瓶绿茶解暑，但觉得3元一瓶有些贵，平时舍不得买。 得知老人的心愿后，拍摄者专门购买了一整箱绿茶送给老人。

@silverfang88 “资本太坏了，人民太善良了，党已经尽力了。能不能不要资本，回到没有资本的幸福时代 😭。对了，交易加密货币请点我”

我已经完全不敢吃中国的街边摊了 大部分外卖也基本不敢吃了 北京那老太婆把变质鸭腿当鹅腿卖 这只是个缩影 大家还是觉得社会上的人太善良了 一旦发现现在已经是资本当道了 人为了200%利润都可以当畜生 一切也都变成PVP斗兽场了

@kujou_king 巨婴的养成：幼年时期觉得自己最牛逼，儿童时期觉得自己的爹最牛逼，认识字了觉得自己的国家最牛逼，然后一直停留在这个状态直到化成灰。总而言之，他们的心智只有小学生水平

我发现中国人真的从来不会思考一下别人为什么讨厌自己，而只会一味地认为这个辱华那个伤害中国人民情感，而自己乱开别人玩笑时就忘了，永远都只认为自己是对的，别人都是错的，巨婴思维

@SuisPasDaVinci 洼地至少80%的人是这个认知

都2026年了，为啥还有人认为普通人不交税？😅

@Ruters0615 五等奴才：你们出国了只能当二等公民，嘻嘻

不言而喻 一目了然

@nytchinese 纽约时报越来越像环球时报。明明反对的是大规模移民政策，却被简单曲解为反对移民。

北爱尔兰爆发反移民暴力骚乱，事件由一起残忍的持刀袭击事件引发。袭击嫌疑人的难民身份点燃了当地人长期酝酿的反移民情绪。极右翼人士呼吁民众走上街头，并声称英国应该驱逐数百万外国出生的人。这里是一份详细解读。cn.nytimes.com/world/20260611…

@MadreperlaB @quarktalksss 请看，这就是沉醉于集体主义的典型症状

@quarktalksss 結果中國上下一心 成為最好的社會 中國經軍工科天下第一

我极度厌恶集体主义的最重要原因之一，就是一个人一旦沉迷于某种集体主义，就会如中了毒瘾一样，拼了命地也要代表其他人：因为我是中国人，所以中国人应该如何如何，因为我是黑人，所以黑人应该如何如何，因为我是女人，所以女人就应该如何如何，因为我是共产党，自称代表了工人，所以工人就应该如何如何，不如何你就是工贼、叛徒。 这就是集体主义最恶臭的思维方式，也就是，它不承认个体是有独立意志的，我和你，你和他，只是恰好共享了某个八竿子打不着的标签，除此以外，没有任何关系。 你会因为一个人跟你是同一个钓鱼俱乐部的会员，就觉得他应该事事都跟你想法相同、步调一致，你就有权对他指手画脚，干涉他的决定吗？ 如果不能，就收起你那套令人作呕的爹味，下次只说你自己要如何如何，就行了。

@Pages__Lily @runningnobody 出卖灵魂的肉喇叭！枉顾事实，信口雌黄。无耻下作

@runningnobody 谁为中国发声过呢？困难的时候帮助过中国的国家中国不会忘记，但是背刺中国的国家也铭记在心

我仔细想了想中国有没有为弱者发声的时候….. 好像从来没有过

@cuichenghao 这同学不是挺好吗

中国最好的高中之一北京人大附中的尖子生一出考场，就被围住采访，记者问，几十年后你最不希望成为什么样的人？他答，不希望成为残忍的人，对遭受虐待的弱势群体，尤其中国的动物福利、动物权利方面提供帮助。有网友不解地问，“他说的动物是指我们吗？”😄🤣

@kenw_2 牛马们好好看看，这才是 真·社会主义接班人

北京人大附中一位亲民高考生走红 大家都说这是未来的书记当年参加高考的珍贵记录

@Asterscabe @dearemon 不给你个年级中队长当一当真是委屈你这觉悟了

我其实不太理解 取消调休 取消基建燃油费 这样的话是从一个还未真正踏入社会的学生口中喊出来的 我更不理解 真正的民意和心声 居然只有在高考生嘴里能够传达出去

@lijinxinglvshi 中国人只信仰钱、权、力量。其他所有价值都是点缀。

海外朋友们，你认为中国社会转型的最大难度是什么呢？

@TangS87821 @satireorcry1 太监普及性知识😂

@satireorcry1 能说出这个B话的一看就知道没有参加过选举。有工作人员会问你是不是不会填写，或者需要什么帮助。不指导这边B，能给你画个猫出来。

回顾“俄式民主” 士兵还可以进去看看选民选的对不对，很贴心的服务！

@wangrizhiying 你也说了你是共情能力强。而粉蛆单纯的就是各方面能力低下，共情能力低、逻辑能力差、求真欲望几乎没有。而他们所谓的“爱国”实则是在维护自己的自尊。

@vegakoto Japan is not the enemy. China's enemy is those who make us believe that Japan is the enemy.

中国は敵ではない。 日本の敵は、中国を敵だと思い込ませてくる奴ら。

@HuangFuping @enx4nr “没想到你文化程度这么低”

@enx4nr 哪怕是大跃进时期，中国的生活水平也好于蒋介石时代的任何一年

もし中国が国民党政府によって統治されていたら 今よりもはるかに経済発展していたのか、 はたまた国内の分断や格差を抑えられず 衰退していたのか わからん ただ少なくとも北朝鮮は負けてた

@whyyoutouzhele 一代人有一代人的红卫兵

@commiepommie Your words are as cheap as your soul.

🇨🇳 The West loves to lecture China about “democracy” while their own voters get more fed up with every election. Politicians come and go, campaigns make all kinds of amazing promises. But once the votes are in, nothing really changes. The same groups stay in control and regular people are left waiting. Is that really what they call freedom of choice? China operates on a completely different model. One that can be hard to understand and easy to misinterpret. President Xi Jinping didn’t gain power through inheritance or wealth. He worked his way up for over forty years, serving at every tier: villages, counties, cities and provinces. He has spent his life governing, not just running for office. Top leadership is elected by the National People’s Congress, while local residents choose their community representatives, with the entire system built from the grassroots up. The Communist Party of China is the world’s largest political organisation, with almost 100 million members rooted in communities nationwide. Its five-year plans aren’t just empty promises either; they get delivered. This is how China pulled hundreds of millions out of poverty, built the planet’s most extensive high-speed rail network and now takes the lead in electric vehicles, renewable energy and key cutting-edge technologies. The country’s leadership has a clear mission: to rejuvenate the nation and work for the Chinese people. When people see real progress being made, the system stays stable, rather than cycling through one disappointment after another. This is supported by the polls. Long-running research from Harvard Kennedy School shows Chinese public satisfaction with the government consistently sits above 90 percent. Edelman’s global trust surveys record government trust at 89 to 91 percent among the highest worldwide. National happiness scores range from 70 to 79 out of 100. Considering everything, it’s reasonable to argue he’s among the most effective national leaders in the world right now. It’s understandable why the critics target this; after all, China keeps achieving things their nations simply cannot. If you witness this steady progress firsthand while living here in China, the reality is simply astonishing. At the end of the day, I have to wonder: does that so-called Western freedom of choice truly deliver better lives for ordinary people, or is it just better marketing?