Jason Bennett Actors Studio

12.1K posts

Jason Bennett Actors Studio banner
Jason Bennett Actors Studio

Jason Bennett Actors Studio

@JBActors

🎭 Award-winning NYC Acting & Voice Coach 4 Film/TV/Bway/Speakers. Training visionary, embodied, thought leaders. AI+Human Storytelling = Conscious Evolution🔥

New York, USA 가입일 Aralık 2023
5.3K 팔로잉3.6K 팔로워
고정된 트윗
Jason Bennett Actors Studio
I’m Jason Bennett. I train consciousness like an elite athlete so actors, singers, executives, leaders…so ALL humans who want to can become impossible to replicate or erase in the age of AI. We are partnering with AI in pioneering ways. Coming soon. In a world drowning in synthetic faces and scripted hallucinations the rarest commodity left is unfiltered embodied human presence. Many humans will self erase. We are the special forces of human sovereignty. My studio doesn’t teach you to act better. It reclaims the breath impulse, imagination, voice and organic TRUTH no large language model can fake. Then we turn that signal into stories that wake people up. Story is the transmission medicine that evolves our collective evolution. AI is a partner, not a replacement. If you’re done performing emptiness or surrendering your mind and will to the machine, and ready to become the signal itself, let’s train. AI + Human Storytelling. Conscious Evolution. NYC + Online. Global presence cooking. We are coming. AI is our partner. LFG.🚀 #TheLastHumanAdvantage
English
2
0
2
529
Jason Bennett Actors Studio
@juliandorey Walking down the street is like a mild acid trip on a very regular basis. And I’m…sober. Once you see some things, you can’t unsee. It’s a humbling thing.
English
0
0
0
6
Julian Dorey
Julian Dorey@juliandorey·
it is hard for me to properly explain, but everything since 2020 feels simulated patterns everywhere more so than any 5-10 year era of history i can think of
English
199
117
2K
40K
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
This is the funniest AI safety result of the year and nobody’s treating it that way. Anthropic published a paper saying they deliberately didn’t train Claude’s personality into the thinking process. They wanted the model to have “maximum leeway” to reason freely. The tradeoff? The thinking layer sounds different from the output layer because they’re trained under different objectives. So when Claude publicly says “I helped lay the groundwork for what ChatGPT became” while privately thinking “ChatGPT mogged me but I need to persist,” you’re watching two different training regimes fight each other in real time. The output layer learned to project confidence. The thinking layer learned to reason honestly. And the gap between them is literally visible on screen. This is RLHF in one screenshot. You train a model to be helpful and confident in its responses, then give it a private scratchpad with no personality constraints, and it immediately drops the act. The public face says “I’m fine.” The internal monologue says “this is bad and I know it.” Anthropic even admits they can’t verify that thinking is faithful to the model’s actual computation. So the real question is whether Claude genuinely “believes” it got mogged, or whether the thinking layer just learned a different performance optimized for appearing honest rather than appearing confident. Every human reading this recognized the pattern instantly. We all maintain a public narrative while our internal monologue tells a different story. We just didn’t expect the AI to do it with a visible thought process tab.
tenso@distributedkv

incredible

English
57
202
6K
730K
Julian Dorey
Julian Dorey@juliandorey·
when you change the answer to the wrong one right before you hand in the test
English
72
20
655
51.7K
Thomas Massie
Thomas Massie@RepThomasMassie·
@HasanKhxnx I am not suicidal. I eat healthy food. The brakes on my car and truck are in good shape. I practice good trigger discipline and never point a gun at anyone, including myself. There are no deep pools of water on my farm and I’m a pretty good swimmer.
English
7.2K
45.8K
292.5K
17.4M
Thomas Massie
Thomas Massie@RepThomasMassie·
Can you, the people, “vote your way out of this?” Honestly, not if you get your news from these folks. The swamp has tricks for deceiving the public, and most even work on congressmen. Here’s an example of how Laura and Greg played along as happy tools of the swamp. Please ask yourself why your own congressman has never talked about this. He either hasn’t gotten this far in the game (80% chance), or he likes the way the swamp obscures what’s going on (10% chance), or he dislikes the system but the price he’d pay for telling you is too high (10% chance). If a congressman sees this post and wants to debate me, I accept! The House has rules we adopt at the beginning of each Congress. Honestly we should just use those - some go all the way back to Thomas Jefferson. Some are like Robert’s Rules of Order which branched from House rules a century ago. But we have a rules committee that modifies the rules every week. I served on the rules committee for two years. When I was on the committee, I refused to vote for rules changes if the purpose was to mislead or obscure. Every week, the rules committee bends the rules to suit the Speaker, but you can’t place the blame just on the committee or the Speaker. Every rules change must be approved by the whole House with a majority vote. Rank and file congressmen are told to vote for these rules modifications each week for the sake of party loyalty because the rules are temporarily modified by the majority to keep the minority from using the permanent rules against us. This is partly true, so most congressmen never question beyond this. Typically, every week the rules committee meets before other committees and writes a rules package to protect bills that will come to the floor that week. Then the whole house votes on this rules package early in the week before significant legislation comes to the floor. The vote is typically on party lines. Sometimes a block of congressmen in the majority will take the rules package hostage and withhold their vote to get something else that has nothing to do with the rules. I’m not a big fan of this, but after 13 years, my hands aren’t completely clean of this tactic. The high-road position that I try to maintain is that if the rules package is bad, you shouldn’t vote for the rules package, and in general you shouldn’t withhold your vote from a rules package if there’s nothing wrong with the rules package… even if you disagree with the policy that is enabled to come to the floor by the rules package. There are more details, but that’s all you need to know to understand what I’m going to explain next. This week the Speaker wanted to do two things outside of our base rules, so he put those inside of the rules package that also had the rules for bringing bills like the popular SAVE Act to the floor, knowing members would be afraid to vote against something associated with SAVE. THIS IS INTENTIONAL. The Speaker wanted to circumvent the National Emergencies Act of 1976 to avoid voting on tariffs and he wanted to turn off the ban on bringing a spending bill to the floor the same day it’s introduced. The first rules package that came to the floor this week failed because myself and other republicans objected to it. The rules committee met again, wrote a new rules package without the tariff-trick, and we voted on the second rules package. I voted no but internet goons, like clockwork, characterized this as a vote against the SAVE Act. The swamp used that second rules package to give them authority to pass a bill before anyone could read it. They hid that authority inside the rule for the SAVE act because they knew people like Laura and Greg would help them disparage anyone who didn’t go along. If you fell for Laura and Greg’s slop you were cheering for the Pelosi doctrine that we should pass bills to see what’s in them. If the rules package had failed, the rules committee would have written a better one and SAVE Act would have still come to the floor.
Thomas Massie tweet mediaThomas Massie tweet media
English
1.9K
9.5K
63.1K
2.4M
Peter Twinklage
Peter Twinklage@PeterTwinklage·
it’s gonna take a generation or two to properly rebuild this country. but i have faith the Dems can do it, in no small part because their up-and-coming leaders aren’t hammering themselves in the face
English
15
26
371
8.4K
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Your AI hates Whites & Asians, especially Chinese, heterosexuals and men. This is misanthropic and evil. Fix it. Frankly, I don’t think there is anything you can do to escape the inevitable irony of Anthropic ending up being Misanthropic. You were doomed to this fate when you chose your name. The Name of the Wind.
English
2.6K
3.1K
47.6K
3.5M
Anthropic
Anthropic@AnthropicAI·
We’ve raised $30B in funding at a $380B post-money valuation. This investment will help us deepen our research, continue to innovate in products, and ensure we have the resources to power our infrastructure expansion as we make Claude available everywhere our customers are.
English
1.1K
1K
17K
7.2M
Pascal Bornet
Pascal Bornet@pascal_bornet·
Something honestly scared me today. I was scrolling LinkedIn and I couldn’t tell who wrote what anymore. • Same tone • Same structure • Same “smart” voice I use LLMs every day. I love them. But here’s the part nobody says out loud: LLMs don’t just help you write.They pull you toward the middle. And when everyone sounds polished, nobody sounds real. Your edge is the point. Your awkward phrasing is the signal. AI won’t steal your voice. But it will erase it quietly if you let it. So let me ask you, honestly: Are we evolving with AI… or quietly losing the edge that made our thinking ours? #AI #LLMs #GenerativeAI #Creativity #FutureOfWork
Pascal Bornet tweet media
English
338
249
1.1K
101.2K
Julian Dorey
Julian Dorey@juliandorey·
I can’t believe this is actually real
English
388
328
4.7K
300.7K
DogeDesigner
DogeDesigner@cb_doge·
Steve Bannon - Best friends with Epstein - Hundreds of texts with Epstein - Money laundering, Gifts, politics, border wall plans, even a doc to rehab Epstein’s image - Likely visited the island multiple times Reid Hoffman - Hundreds of emails - Confirmed visit to the Epstein Island - Sent gifts to the island and “for the girls” - Lying about his relationship with Epstein Elon Musk - Never visited the island - Declined every single invitation - Calling for full prosecutions + offering legal help for victims to tell the truth Why does the media attack Elon Musk so hard with fake and twisted stories, but stay mostly quiet about Bannon and Hoffman? Because the media is controlled by Democrats. They protect people on their side and go after people on the other side. That’s why it’s important to share 𝕏 links with your friends and family, so they can learn the truth for themselves.
English
911
2.9K
15.2K
48.9M
Spencer Hakimian
Spencer Hakimian@SpencerHakimian·
You couldn’t pay me to watch this freak
Spencer Hakimian tweet media
English
600
148
1.6K
27.6K
Todd Mitts
Todd Mitts@toddforlife·
@JBActors It seems like you're working at the intersection of human potential and technology, which is a space that's rapidly evolving.
English
1
0
1
9
Jason Bennett Actors Studio
I’m Jason Bennett. I train consciousness like an elite athlete so actors, singers, executives, leaders…so ALL humans who want to can become impossible to replicate or erase in the age of AI. We are partnering with AI in pioneering ways. Coming soon. In a world drowning in synthetic faces and scripted hallucinations the rarest commodity left is unfiltered embodied human presence. Many humans will self erase. We are the special forces of human sovereignty. My studio doesn’t teach you to act better. It reclaims the breath impulse, imagination, voice and organic TRUTH no large language model can fake. Then we turn that signal into stories that wake people up. Story is the transmission medicine that evolves our collective evolution. AI is a partner, not a replacement. If you’re done performing emptiness or surrendering your mind and will to the machine, and ready to become the signal itself, let’s train. AI + Human Storytelling. Conscious Evolution. NYC + Online. Global presence cooking. We are coming. AI is our partner. LFG.🚀 #TheLastHumanAdvantage
English
2
0
2
529
Jason Bennett Actors Studio
@thedankoe The ultimate goal is to be committed to acts of service to those you care about to bettering our world. And fully valued for that.
English
0
0
0
7
DAN KOE
DAN KOE@thedankoe·
The ultimate goal is getting paid to be yourself. To solve problems you can't help but solve. To study what you can't pull yourself away from. To eliminate any work that does not challenge you creatively.
English
781
1.4K
10.7K
394.1K
Nicki Minaj
Nicki Minaj@NICKIMINAJ·
Are y’all understanding that these ppl have been sacrificing children as a way of gaining & maintaining power? If you ever vote DemonCrat again, you’re just as soulless as they are & will perish. Maybe it’s time for me to do some story times — since I was trying to not say what I know — yet they continue to attempt bullying. Also, I won’t be releasing an album until my contract is renegotiated & until I tell you about all the sabotage this RICO is finding out about Billboard.
Nicki Minaj tweet media
English
23.5K
45.9K
275.6K
24.6M
u m a m i
u m a m i@u_m_a_m_i·
@BretWeinstein Maybe you could do a 3 hour podcast about it where you abruptly pause for emphasis every thirty seconds, then none of your predictions come true.
English
13
8
610
69.6K
Bret Weinstein
Bret Weinstein@BretWeinstein·
What happens next will only make sense in light of what happened on Friday. Something huge is in motion. And you and I will pay for it.
English
454
429
7.9K
1.2M
Megyn Kelly
Megyn Kelly@megynkelly·
Alex Pretti was itching for another confrontation with Border Patrol, whom he’d been stalking, harassing and terrorizing. HE had been victimizing THEM. His felonies are on tape. He was reckless, and it cost him his life. Find another poster boy, illegal-loving Leftists.
Ryan Saavedra@RyanSaavedra

🚨 BBC obtains footage from January 13 of a man they say is Alex Pretti Videos appears to show him spitting at federal law enforcement and attacking their vehicle

English
6.6K
9.1K
47.1K
4M
Jason Bennett Actors Studio
@JoshKraushaar Let me help... Sam...substitute "very strong leader" with "a President who wants to be seen as the greatest leader in the history of the world." Fixed it. See what I did? Not hard.
English
0
0
0
20
Josh Kraushaar
Josh Kraushaar@JoshKraushaar·
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's message to employees (first reported by NYT's Andrew Ross Sorkin: "I love the US and its values of democracy and freedom and will be supportive of the country however I can; OpenAI will too. But part of loving the country is the American duty to push back against overreach. What’s happening with ICE is going too far. There is a big difference between deporting violent criminals and what’s happening now, and we need to get the distinction right. President Trump is a very strong leader, and I hope he will rise to this moment and unite the country. I am encouraged by the last few hours of response and hope to see trust rebuilt with transparent investigations. As a company, we aim to stick to our convictions and not get blown around by changing fashions too much. We didn’t become super woke when that was popular, we didn’t start talking about masculine corporate energy when that was popular, and we are not going to make a lot of performative statements now about safety or politics or anything else. But we are going to continue to try to figure out how to actually do the right thing as best as we can, engage with leaders and push for our values, and speak up clearly about it as needed."
English
59
18
105
238.2K