๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค”

224 posts

๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค” banner
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค”

๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค”

@JakeLaperruque

@cendemtech Deputy Director on Surveillance. Tweeting about tech, privacy, and surveillance policyโ€ฆAlso lots of posts on cats, movies, and baseball

Washington DC ๊ฐ€์ž…์ผ Nisan 2009
213 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰3.2K ํŒ”๋กœ์›Œ
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค”
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค”@JakeLaperruqueยท
I spent over 10 years trying to show how FISA 702 means sacrificing your rights and creating serious dangers of surveillance abuse, and he .... just tweeted it out?
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค” tweet media๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค” tweet media
English
0
1
1
20
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค”
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค”@JakeLaperruqueยท
To borrow a brilliant summary from @LizaGoitein If this law was a new proposal not a renewal and Trump was demandingโ€ฆ Warrantless surveillance. That swept up Americans. That the FBI could use to query Americans comms. With no court approval Not a single Dem would vote for it
Anthony Adragna@AnthonyAdragna

House Armed Services Committee top Democrat @RepAdamSmith says heโ€™s โ€œundecidedโ€ on a clean FISA extension and โ€œdeeply concernedโ€ about giving Trump powers.

English
0
1
1
176
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค” ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Jake Sherman
Jake Sherman@JakeShermanยท
JAMIE RASKIN, top Democrat on House Judiciary, says at the House Rules Committee that he will oppose a clean extension of FISA. He said "FISA needs independent guardrails" from Trump admin.
English
2
29
151
17.4K
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค” ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Jordain Carney
Jordain Carney@jordaincยท
Big swath of House Dems -- including CHC, CAPAC and CPC -- sending a letter to leadership outlining changes they want to a 702 bill Comes as GOP leadership pushing forward w/ 18-month clean extension even as they don't currently appear to have the votes
Jordain Carney tweet mediaJordain Carney tweet mediaJordain Carney tweet mediaJordain Carney tweet media
English
1
15
24
4.6K
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค” ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Jordain Carney
Jordain Carney@jordaincยท
Johnson's comments come as there's some frustration from his right flank who feel like leadership/WH just wants them to swallow clean 18-month extension House Dems as @meredithllee and I scooped working on possible back up plan Rs also eyeing shorter clean extension
Cami Mondeaux@cami_mondeaux

Speaker Johnson this morning on what FISA bill vote will look like this week: โ€œItโ€™s going to be a clean extension. If we put amendments on it, it jeopardizes its passage, and it's far too important.โ€

English
0
3
2
2.6K
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค” ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Rep. Warren Davidson
Rep. Warren Davidson@Rep_Davidsonยท
Reauthorizing FISA Section 702 without any reforms to protect privacy would be a major disservice to the American people. I urge Congress to consider my amendment to close the data broker loophole and restore Americansโ€™ Fourth Amendment protections. politico.com/live-updates/2โ€ฆ
English
30
49
139
2.9K
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค” ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Thomas Massie
Thomas Massie@RepThomasMassieยท
I vote with GOP 91% of the time, but thatโ€™s about to go to 90%. I wonโ€™t vote to let feds spy on you without a warrant. FISA 702 allows the government to search for your information in vast databases compiled while targeting foreigners. The White House sent me this email today:
Thomas Massie tweet media
English
1.3K
6.9K
36.4K
900.4K
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค”
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค”@JakeLaperruqueยท
The simple answer is because his claim is false. Congress does not have the ability to audit FISA 702 queries for propriety. They depend on the DOJ for oversight, and even if that review is trustworthy it does not occur in "real time"
English
1
0
3
221
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค”
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค”@JakeLaperruqueยท
If @jahimes actually had ability to detect FISA 702 abuse in real-time, why didn't he alert the public when it was abused to query BLM protesters, or lawmakers, or Congressional staff, or 19,000 campaign donors, or a judge reporting civil rights violations?
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค” tweet media
English
1
3
5
245
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค”
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค”@JakeLaperruqueยท
After 3 days stranded by @AmericanAir โ€” with cancelled flights, no help, & reclassifying missing crew to avoid responsibility โ€” we had to buy tickets on another airline just to get home. Hoping leadership see this, make it right, and treats others better #AmericanAirlines
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค” tweet media
English
3
1
17
2.5K
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค”
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค”@JakeLaperruqueยท
Clearview AI runs a sponsored piece in Police1 saying critics push facial recognition "myths" and "debunks" false claims, such as notion that you can scan images of any quality Hmm, wonder where folks got that wild idea from? (They got it from Clearview AI marketing materials)
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค” tweet media๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค” tweet media๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค” tweet media
English
0
0
2
329
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค”
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค”@JakeLaperruqueยท
In 2017, just one state (Oregon) restricted facial recognition, and only did so in a very limited way. By the end of 2024, FIFTEEN states now have laws limiting police use of facial recognition, and these limits involve increasingly strong guardrails
English
0
0
0
101
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค”
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค”@JakeLaperruqueยท
Overall, weโ€™ve seen ongoing trend and encouraging momentum for limiting facial recognition surveillance at the state level, with a growing set of states enacting increasingly strong regulations for police use of this AI surveillance technology
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค” tweet media
English
1
0
1
131
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค” ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค”
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค”@JakeLaperruqueยท
@OrinKerr I think the case that Upstream + "Abouts" collection (or, since its FISA 702, a domestic version with a warrant obtained for the targets) complies with the Fourth Amendment is *very* hard to make
English
0
0
0
43
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค”
๐Ÿ™ƒ Jake Laperruque ๐Ÿค”@JakeLaperruqueยท
@OrinKerr This strikes me as best email comparison (maybe best comparison in general) to geofence: 1) Non-govt entity with access scans 4A protected content per govt order 2) The content itself is what determines responsiveness 3) The content may be totally disconnected from criminality
English
1
0
0
56