Kevin Huber

@KenEllwood @foundingfurther @C_3C_3 “Followers”. Spoken like a true loser.

@foundingfurther @KevinCHuber @C_3C_3 I've not insulted you. You insulted OP, and was asked to explain. You can not. Your arrogance and inability to make any serious points, while insulting everyone else's is probably why you have 34 followers.

There are 42 states that hold bartenders accountable if the customers they over serve kill someone but 0 states that hold Judges accountable if the criminals they release kill someone. Insane.

@TedUrchin @AmericaPapaBear You hate Trump because you hate yourselves. He reminds you what constitutes a strong leader, right or wrong. You haven’t had that since Thatcher.

@AmericaPapaBear In the UK we hate Trump. Simple.

🚨BREAKING: A massive crowd of people have gathered in London in support of the American left’s No Kings protest. The country that literally has a King is protesting against America who doesn’t. Can’t make this stuff up.

@foundingfurther @KenEllwood @C_3C_3 Getting all philosophical but yet still a dope:

@KenEllwood @KevinCHuber @C_3C_3 I have never known real strength to feel the need to explain itself to every detractor. This is especially true when the person who demands you explain yourself does so off of the back of a personal insult. Someone of that caliber doesn't set the terms of the engagement.

@TheoTheCheetah @sayonarabebou @woofknight Nikola Tesla is an exception.

@sayonarabebou @woofknight Of course the Serbian dude will say the most retarded thing ever, you're genetically predisposed to be stupid.

At 40, Franz Kafka (1883-1924), who never married and had no children, walked through the park in Berlin when he met a girl who was crying because she had lost her favourite doll. She and Kafka searched for the doll unsuccessfully. Kafka told her to meet him there the next day and they would come back to look for her. The next day, when they had not yet found the doll, Kafka gave the girl a letter “written” by the doll saying “please don’t cry. I took a trip to see the world. I will write to you about my adventures.” Thus began a story which continued until the end of Kafka’s life. During their meetings, Kafka read the letters of the doll carefully written with adventures and conversations that the girl found adorable. Finally, Kafka brought back the doll (he bought one) that had returned. “It doesn’t look like my doll at all,“ said the girl. Kafka handed her another letter in which the doll wrote: "my travels have changed me.” the little girl hugged the new doll and brought her happy home. A year later Kafka died. Many years later, the now-adult girl found a letter inside the doll. In the tiny letter signed by Kafka it was written: “Everything you love will probably be lost, but in the end, love will return in another way.”

@recklessracoonn @foundingfurther @C_3C_3 Everyone gets this. It’s not hard. But judicial immunity needs to be challenged if it consistently and flagrantly runs afoul of both the law and justice. That and the hypocrisy was the point. Self-regulate or meet the people in the street.

@KevinCHuber @foundingfurther @C_3C_3 Here, I’ll hep out, based on a great reply that actually reflects reality.

@foundingfurther @C_3C_3 Explain with detail and purpose. Until then you are the chump you appear to be.

@C_3C_3 Only on X could this be seen as a legitimate take. Embarrassing how facile of an argument this is.

It’s nonsense? State sanctioned and encouraged suicide is okay for you? How many billions of dollars are spent on research and development of psychotropic drugs and the analysis of the human brain? Not one doctor around the world could treat them? Furthermore, from a sociological standpoint this is not acceptable. Sets a bad precedent.

@EniorJimenez Te invito a que tengas la trágica experiencia que tuvo alguna de las tres y luego escribas esta burrada

– Shanti De Corte (Bélgica): a los 17 años, sobrevivió (ilesa) al atentado terrorista de ISIS que dejó 32 muertos en el aeropuerto de Bruselas. El suceso le provocó un trastorno de estrés postraumático. Fue internada en varias ocasiones en unidades psiquiátricas estatales y sometida a fuerte medicación. Con el apoyo de sus padres, en 2022 dos psiquiatras aprobaron su solicitud de eutanasia. En mayo de ese año, a los 23 años, Shanti fue sometida a eutanasia mediante inyección letal en presencia de su familia. – Milou Verhoof (Países Bajos): fue violada a los 13 años, lo que derivó en una depresión postraumática. Sus padres la internaron en una unidad psiquiátrica estatal, donde fue nuevamente abusada sexualmente. Sus propios padres contactaron a un psiquiatra dispuesto a practicarle la eutanasia. El 2 de octubre de 2023, Milou recibió la eutanasia a la edad de 17 años en la habitación de su infancia, con las uñas pintadas, ataviada con un vestido de gala y calzando tacones altos. – Noelia Castillo Ramos (España): a los 13 años, sus padres se divorciaron y atravesaban una situación de inestabilidad económica; por consiguiente, el Estado asumió la tutela legal de Noelia y la internó en un centros de menores. En 2022, fue víctima de una violación grupal. Esto le provocó una depresión postraumática, lo que la llevó a intentar suicidarse lanzándose desde un quinto piso. Sobrevivió, pero quedó con lesiones graves. Con el apoyo de su madre, pero en contra de los deseos de su padre, solicitó la eutanasia en 2024. Tras casi dos años de litigios, hoy se le practicará la eutanasia a los 25 años de edad. El hospital que presionó para que se le practicara la eutanasia recibirá la donación de sus órganos. En cada caso, se trata de mujeres jóvenes que, en su mayoría, gozan de salud física, pero sufren mentalmente. ¿Y qué hace el Estado? En lugar de curarlas, las mata. Los padres y el Estado, las principales autoridades moralmente obligadas a protegerlas, les fallan y, al final, para lavarse las manos, se deshacen de ellas bajo el pretexto de una «muerte digna». Esto es inmoral. Esto es perverso. Esto es, francamente, diabólico. Hay una agenda en marcha en Occidente, en particular, Europa: la reducción y sustitución de la población. Por eso, el suicidio se ensalza como una virtud y nuestros doctores se están convirtiendo en nuestros verdugos. La pregunta clave es: ¿quién está detrás de esta agenda inhumana y anticristiana?

@aj_inapi This is exactly right. This also applies to economics. The reason why communism and even socialism doesn’t work is the inherent hierarchical nature of human interaction. It’s a dog eat dog world I’m afraid.

When you're a war fighter in the United States military, most of the time you start very young. 18, 19, 20 years old. You haven't seen the world yet. You haven't seen politics. You haven't seen war. You haven't seen how ugly humans can be to each other. Then people ask: Why do young Americans join the military? The most common reasons are actually very simple: Patriotism — they genuinely love their country Education — GI Bill, college, training Opportunity — travel, career, stability Family tradition — father, mother, grandfather served Discipline and purpose — structure and direction Financial stability — steady pay, benefits To be part of something bigger than themselves Very few 18-year-olds are thinking about geopolitics, oil routes, trade lanes, NATO alliances, deterrence strategy, or global power balance. They just sign up to serve. Then they deploy. They see things no human being should see. They lose friends. They operate in places most Americans can’t find on a map. They come home if they’re lucky — and many come home different people. And then the questions start: Why are we fighting all these wars? Why are we spending so much money overseas? Why are Americans dying in countries most Americans don’t know about? Is it worth it? If that veteran starts reading history, geopolitics, military strategy, economics, world wars, Cold War strategy, trade routes, global power competition — they sometimes begin to understand why America is involved everywhere. Not because war is good. But because power vacuums are worse. However, if instead they only listen to certain political voices, media narratives, or one-sided explanations, they can form a worldview based only on their deployment experience, not the full global picture. Their view of the world becomes frozen in time — the year they deployed, the war they fought, the friends they lost. Then they go home. They build a life. They raise kids. And they pass that worldview to their children. Now look at the military families. Wives raising kids alone during deployments. Parents waiting for phone calls. Families seeing their son or daughter come home changed. Birthdays missed. Funerals attended. Marriages strained. PTSD, injuries, memories that never leave. War doesn’t just affect the soldier. It affects entire families for generations. Now here’s the uncomfortable truth: War is never good. Nobody sane wants war. But saying you want a world without war is like saying you want a world without crime, greed, power, religion, resources, borders, or ideology. In other words, you’re saying you want a different humanity. Civilization itself has always been protected by people willing to fight for it. No military = no deterrence. No deterrence = power vacuum. Power vacuum = someone else takes control. And history shows that the people who take control are usually not the nice ones. So the bottom line is this: In America, you sign up voluntarily. Not by force. You choose to serve. You choose to fight. You choose to defend something you believe in. You may grow older and question the wars, the politics, the decisions. You may even become a voice trying to change the system. But to completely eliminate war, conflict, and power struggles… You wouldn’t just have to change governments. You would have to change human nature itself.

@PoliticalStacy @BillboardChris @19Yrag 🤪🤮

@KevinCHuber @BillboardChris @19Yrag She’s got a 4 inch clit in her waistband.

Trans-identified female lawyer berates judge, pulls trans card, gets found in contempt, resists arrest, screams “I can’t breathe,” and yells for people to call 911 as she’s fighting police. Absolutely glorious performance. Women should not take testosterone.

@PoliticalStacy @BillboardChris @19Yrag Wait, explain the cock tuck in this situation?

@BillboardChris @19Yrag This is a perfect example of privilege. This disgusting creature doesn’t think any rules apply to them because they play dress up and cock tuck every morning. Surprise! Not everyone subscribes to your delusions, bitch.

@alyssamariiee11 Brilliant.

I want Trump to change ICE to NICE (National Immigration and Customs Enforcement) so the media has to say NICE agents all day everyday

I wouldn’t know if and how hospitals raise their rates because they don’t publish them. You have no idea how much you are going to pay before, during or even after you go in. How do you get a 25 year old to pay $25k in hospital bills? Answer: you can’t. Hospitals need truth in pricing policies and insurance needs to be reasonable. 25 y/o’s aren’t typically in need of long term care and their rates should be much lower.

And that is why hospitals have to raise their prices to cover the loss from patient's who won't pay their bills. We had about 5 employees plus their supervisor dealing with accounts that patients who weren't eligibility for our empathy discount (based on family size and income) yet still wouldn't pay. They did everything they could to get them to pay, even offering discounts and payment plans. Some took the discounts and paid their balance; other's took the discount but never paid a cent of their balance.

American is a healthy 28 year old, he decided to skip paying for health insurance this year because the cheapest plan was $900 per month with a high deductible He had to spend 2 nights in the ER without insurance, he breaks down the bill “This is my receipt from spending 2 days in the hospital: - It totaled about $24,000 - My CT scan alone was $8,300 - Laboratory, 6,000 - IV therapy, $1,020, $4,000 in total And while $24,000 seems like a lot of money, let me show you something. This is what I'm actually paying, $2,478 because when you don't have insurance, these hospitals give you a discount. They discounted $22,000 off of this bill” “But if I had insurance, I wouldn't have gotten that discount. So it would've been a $24,000 bill billed to my insurance, and then my insurance would've said, ‘Hey, you have a $5,000 deductible. You need to pay $5,000 for this last emergency room visit.’ Then you tack on the $900 a month that I'd be paying for that insurance. I'd be paying $20K this year for healthcare. So the craziest part about this is even if I have another hospital visit, by the end of this year, I'm still gonna be paying less than I would if I had insurance. At minimum, my cost for healthcare this year would've been $20,000 with insurance. Right now I'm at $2,400.” US Health Insurance is a scam

Yeah, but you can’t get blood from a stone, and for a kid who doesn’t want to pay for insurance good luck collecting. In the end, if you don’t make a steep concession, then all you will be getting is 10¢ on the dollar after the debt is sold to a collection agency. And that’s a big maybe.

Not every hospital gives you a discount. I worked 15 years in the billing department of a major metropolitan hospital. We had a program that we could offer people without insurance or low income people who did have insurance. It was a program we were required to offer to pay off some of the debt we owed when we upgraded our ER. Once that obligation was fulfilled, we no longer offered the program.

@NJ_USA_Patriot @WallStreetApes Duh.

The part you are skipping is, after you worked for years and saved your money (while not having insurance), if something happens you WILL LOSE ALL YOUR MONEY. This works while you are young and don't have shit, but once you are older, own things, have a family, you are just cannot not have it.

@grok @1OldRoamer @prosp3kt @Trulytruist @USAarmedforces @MrAndyNgo Perhaps this should change. People not institutions only should be held accountable.

In WA's NGRI system (RCW 10.77), DSHS/court accountability for post-release reoffense means civil liability suits against the state if negligence (e.g., ignoring known risks via flawed evaluations) is proven—often resulting in settlements/damages paid by taxpayers. Individual psychiatrists or PSRP board members face licensing complaints or malpractice claims, but rarely license revocation, imprisonment, or personal fines/restitution unless clear criminal misconduct (intent/gross negligence) is shown, which is uncommon. Conditional release includes DOC supervision and revocation options to mitigate.

A Seattle man who shot and killed an eight-month pregnant Korean-American woman and nearly killed her husband when they were driving to work has been found not guilty by reason of insanity. Cordell Goosby m—rdered Elina Kwon and her unborn baby in June 2023 when they were stopped at a red light. Prosecutors did not charge him for killing the baby due to concerns about protecting abortion in the liberal state. After hearing testimony from defense medical experts that Goosby was "insane" at the time of the shootings, the prosecution agreed to have the case ended through the not guilty motion. Goosby will be committed to an institution and regularly evaluated to see if he is fit to be released to the public. ngocomment.com

@grok So when you say that the DSHS is accountable should they release him and he reoffends, such as with a murder, what does that mean? Does that mean his case psychiatrist and board will lose his/her license? How about imprisonment? How about punitive monetary fines and restitution?

Goosby had prior Illinois felony convictions including weapons charges and Seattle police mental health contacts pre-2023, but no local arrests or commitments. Involuntary holds demand proof of imminent danger, a high bar many cases miss. NGRI turns only on his state at the shooting—unanimous experts (prosecution and defense) found he couldn't grasp wrongfulness then. He's now under indefinite DSHS psychiatric custody with repeated safety reviews for any release.

@traderjlj @shanaka86 Pounding the keyboard gets you nowhere skippy. Smarten up.

If Europe had any sense at all, they would recognize the U.S. is their greatest adversary and threat. Cut a deal with Russia and Iran. Put the U.S. right back in place. History has shown, they have very little intelligence of leadership, so they will make the deal and commit to being the whipping boy.

BREAKING: President Trump just told 450 million Europeans: sign my deal by Thursday or I cut your gas. And if you think this is impulsive, you are not paying attention. This is the most calculated energy play in American history. Qatar’s LNG is offline. Force Majeure. Ras Laffan shut after Iranian drones hit it on Day 3. Seventeen percent of global LNG capacity gone for 3 to 5 years. Russia’s pipeline gas to Europe was severed after Ukraine. Norway is maxed. Europe’s LNG prices have surged 35 to 50 percent since Hormuz closed. One supplier remains at scale: the United States. Trump’s ambassador to the EU just told the Parliament: ratify the $750 billion trade deal without amendments by Thursday March 26, or lose “favorable access” to American LNG. Now decode the strategic geopolitical chess game which is being played in realtime. Saturday night, Trump posted a 48-hour ultimatum threatening to obliterate Iranian power plants. That was not about Iran. That was about oil prices. He needed them high enough to terrify Europe into ratifying the LNG deal, but not so high that American consumers revolted before the midterms. The ultimatum spiked Brent past $113 and WTI past $100 on Sunday. Monday morning, Trump posted about “productive conversations” and paused the power plant strikes for five days. Oil crashed over 10 percent in hours. WTI hit $89. The S&P surged $2 trillion. He spiked oil to create the fear. Then crashed it to create the relief. The fear makes Europe sign. The relief makes American voters forgive the war. Both moves serve the same president. Both happened within 36 hours. Both were executed with social media posts, not missiles. The $750 billion deal is the permanent monetisation of Europe’s energy vulnerability. LNG. Oil. Civil nuclear. Locked in until 2028. The EU had been delaying ratification for months. Three wars removed every alternative: Iran removed Qatar, Ukraine removed Russia, Norway’s geology removed Norway. What remains is American LNG. Trump is not selling gas. He is selling the absence of alternatives. The 5-day power-plant pause expires Saturday March 28. The EU Parliament votes Thursday March 26. Europe must ratify American energy dependency two days before the war might escalate again. If the pause collapses Saturday and Iran executes Ghalibaf’s promise to “irreversibly destroy” regional energy infrastructure, European LNG prices spike after the deal is already signed. Trump gets the $750 billion commitment at crisis pricing, then potentially triggers the next crisis 48 hours later. The deal locks in before the leverage expires. This is Trump Doctrine in its purest form. He does not separate trade from security from energy from markets. He operates them as one instrument. The war degrades Iran. The degradation closes Hormuz. The closure spikes energy. The spike terrifies Europe. The terror forces the deal. The deal locks in $750 billion. The pause crashes oil. The crash rallies stocks. The rally preserves midterm support. Every move funds the next move. He used the words “Department of War” in the pause announcement. Not Defence. The pre-1947 name. The name that tells Europe: the man offering you gas can resume bombing power plants on Saturday. Yesterday Russia signed a deal to build Vietnam’s first nuclear plant. Today Trump threatens to cut Europe’s gas. Two great powers selling energy security to two desperate continents during the same war. Both profit from the crisis. Both lock in decades of dependency. Both timed the offer to the moment the customer cannot refuse. The strait closed the alternatives. The ultimatum created the fear. The pause created the relief. The deal monetises both. Thursday is payday. Full deep dive analysis: open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…

@moonsunstar88 @LauraLoomer I sort of agree with you. Years ago people didn’t travel with infants unless absolutely necessary. Times change.

@LauraLoomer I refused to travel by plane when my children were infants for that very reason. I never understood why anyone would want to even attempt to go on vacation with an infant. We stayed close to home when our kids were young. Infants are miserable when you interrupt their routine.

Or people can learn how to be more considerate and buy ear plugs for their kids. People don’t pay to travel to listen to other peoples’ kids scream. Why should my comfort be disrupted over someone who neglects their kid for 10 hours? Ever heard of a pacifier or a nanny? People are so inconsiderate.

@LauraLoomer I agree that parents should be more courteous. However, childless people should not make the rules for society.

Not in Business or First class. People pay to have comfort in Business and First class so they can work, not listen to crying babies. I don’t want to listen to crying babies when I’m traveling for work and paying more for comfort while I work.

This is only in the younger age groups. And this is because young men take more risks and drive fast. What he is, clumsily, discussing is crisis decision making and reaction time. Men are far superior on average. Sorry. How many women have entered and won a NASCAR or F1 series or grand prix? Zero.

@Alienado2019 @aapayes Men pay more for insurance because they are safer drivers? Nope, you are sexist and wrong.

Una joven estaba cruzando la calle se resbaló y un vehiculo la atropello, en el Astillero en Krasnoyarsk. En la escena se aprecia como el coche al principio ralentiza, pero luego el conductor presiona el acelerador. La joven quedó debajo del coche y la arrastró unos metros