David Lindeque

313 posts

David Lindeque banner
David Lindeque

David Lindeque

@LindequeDavid

Tech + Markets. Opinion, not advice.

Los Angeles, CA 가입일 Mayıs 2022
301 팔로잉48 팔로워
Adaptive
Adaptive@adaptiveai·
Introducing Adaptive Computer. We put AI inside of an always-on personal computer that it uses to get work done. Schedule agents. Create software. Automate anything. As part of the launch, we’re giving one free month of Adaptive to users. Retweet, like, and comment ‘Adaptive’ to get it.
English
1.9K
1.4K
4.6K
1.2M
David Lindeque
David Lindeque@LindequeDavid·
Shorting RGTI, after sitting in a six digit profit then watching it whip away on these upsides, I’m taking a seat and avoiding this trade. While this company is truly worthless, too many retail bozos and institutional grifters pump the price. Look at the quantum ETF many large asset managers (eg Northwestern Mutual) are pushing in their model portfolio and on to their boomer clients - $RGTI is the biggest allocation in the ETF. Prices do not and will not follow any logical sense.
English
2
0
2
151
Common Sense Investor (CSI)
Common Sense Investor (CSI)@commonsenseplay·
Breaking: Rigetti $RGTI provides update on its failure to meet key technology hardware timeline! Rigetti's CEO publicly stated in their second quarter 2025 release that it was" “on track to deliver our 100+ qubit chiplet‑based quantum system with an anticipated 99.5% median two‑qubit gate fidelity by the end of 2025.” Today they just announced general availability of its 108-qubit Cepheus-1 system is delayed to the end of Q1 2026 to "further optimize performance". The missed tech milestones keep piling up! investors.rigetti.com/news-releases/…
Common Sense Investor (CSI)@commonsenseplay

BREAKING: Rigetti $RGTI fails to meet key technology hardware timeline! 1. Rigetti's CEO publicly stated in their second quarter 2025 release (link below) that it was “on track to deliver our 100+ qubit chiplet‑based quantum system with an anticipated 99.5% median two‑qubit gate fidelity by the end of 2025.” 2. In mid‑2025 the company achieved 99.5% two‑qubit gate fidelity on a 36‑qubit system, a milestone toward larger systems. 3.But as of today, Jan 1  2026 there’s no press release or official product announcement confirming delivery of the promised 100+ qubit system by year‑end 2025. They failed to meet their promised timeline, no communication or management - complete disregard for their investors - this completely erodes trust! Meanwhile, financials show continued operating losses and abysmal revenue in 2025, along with now key failed milestones. So: the 100+ qubit system has not been confirmed as delivered on schedule, despite repeated roadmap restatements and mid‑year fidelity achievements! The stock has dropped over 60% over the last few months but still remains a GENERATIONAL SHORT OPPORTUNITY, single digits incoming! investors.rigetti.com/news-releases/…

English
8
1
24
4.5K
David Lindeque
David Lindeque@LindequeDavid·
@MartinShkreli Listed quantum companies exist for the sole purpose of enriching insiders. Nothing else. Private markets are sufficient. Made evident by nonstop insider selling.
English
1
0
7
836
Martin Shkreli
Martin Shkreli@MartinShkreli·
quantum will continue to sink as $NVDA buys Groq, showing no interest in QC. but the need for compute is still real. i think we have to think about a path past transistor-based computing, or we will actually cover the world (and space?) in data centers
English
64
18
535
110.5K
David Lindeque
David Lindeque@LindequeDavid·
@BallerBrand88 @commonsenseplay It’s at least a decade from anything material. Once you dive deeper into it, you see it’s a field of wildly hopeful dreams that are much, much further away than people think.
English
0
0
2
64
Common Sense Investor (CSI)
Common Sense Investor (CSI)@commonsenseplay·
Quantum up across the board. $IONQ $RGTI $QUBT $QBTS Yes, I’m still short and no, my price targets for covering haven’t changed. Short term fluctuations don’t bother me - you shouldn’t be shorting if they bother you. Shorting is not for everyone - conviction and patience are key.
Common Sense Investor (CSI) tweet media
English
58
4
72
12.6K
Common Sense Investor (CSI)
Common Sense Investor (CSI)@commonsenseplay·
Continued strength from Sarepta $SRPT - hopefully you didn’t get shaken out on any dips. This will go back to $50.
Common Sense Investor (CSI) tweet media
English
10
1
29
4.8K
黒川@投資初心者🔰
黒川@投資初心者🔰@kurokawaakito48·
量子コンピューターを色々調べてるんだけどRGTIが他と違って頭1つ抜けてるんだよね。 自社で開発から製造まで全部手掛けてるから将来的には強そうなんだけど、 財務が全然ダメだから厳しいなぁ😇 やっぱり今、量子買っとくとしたらIONQになるのは頷ける。うん。
日本語
7
2
155
16.6K
Calum
Calum@bitcalumm·
Officially in my first LEAP: $RGTI Jan 2027 $55 calls @ $5.00 average Paired it with a chunk of shares - $500 worth 2 years for quantum to go mainstream? Count me in 🚀 Let’s see how this ages...
English
1
1
1
341
The Intelligence Investor
The Intelligence Investor@NCrossette·
people not buying up quantum computer and nuclear power stocks right now are making a mistake. Super cheap prices on stocks like $RGTI and $SMR
English
2
0
0
213
Lukevol
Lukevol@luke_vol·
$RGTI just bellow the key 27 level. Stock seems to have bottomed in the short term. With some volume we can see a pretty large and quick retracement into 30 and then potentially 40.
Lukevol tweet media
English
4
1
8
1K
Walley 💱
Walley 💱@walley_1·
$RGTI Expected scenario for the next few days 👀🪄 The structure is turning more constructive, and momentum is gradually building. If we get a clean reaction from this zone, a solid move could develop in the coming sessions. NFA ❗️ #السوق_الامريكي #السوق_الامريكي_بالعربي
Walley 💱 tweet media
English
7
3
11
4.2K
Oliver
Oliver@xyzdkfe·
Shorting $QBTS and $RGTI now makes sense because the momentum is broken and they’re crashing. So risk profile on that is favorable. After volatility the market is wising up, and will try to separate the garbage from the “quality” IONQ is just as garbage, but I would see it as a positive when the correlation between the quantum names break, because the market IQ goes up and isn’t melting up everything quantum. The diversification strategy of IONQ is such a slimy strategy. Bundle a lot of imaginary lines of business and making it seem like they’re real and legit. Quantum networking is BS, so is quantum space and drones and aviation surely comes. Quantum sensing may be ok, but the TAM is small.
English
2
1
5
610
Dr. Hugh Bitt
Dr. Hugh Bitt@Cat_States·
Two quantum zombies 🧟 $RGTI (Rigetti) and $QBTS (D-Wave) are trading at $8B+ market caps. These companies are dead ends. Unscalable architectures. No sensing or networking businesses for fallback or upside. Zero logical qubits between them. Meanwhile, two SPAC merger candidates - $CCCX (Infleqtion) and $CHAC (Xanadu) - are trading at implied valuations of HALF these zombie companies 🤷‍♂️ Infleqtion has a legitimate compute business with strong sensing capabilities. Diversified revenue, real customers. Xanadu is betting on photonics - requires incredible engineering execution, but could leapfrog the whole industry if they pull it off. Some like @commonsenseplay have advocated shorting $RGTI. That's risky as meme momentum can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent. It's not a good risk profile either - your maximum return is 100%, but your maximum loss is unlimited. I've come at this from the other angle: strategic positions in $CCCX and $CHAC, with downside protection from the SPAC merger mechanics. The market is pricing quantum hype, not quantum capability. That gap won't last forever.
Dr. Hugh Bitt tweet media
English
13
12
86
12.9K
Musa
Musa@Musadamoor·
@LindequeDavid Any stocks u wish to share fam i have made money both ways on rgti thats why I mentioned it
English
1
0
0
34
Izabela Melamed
Izabela Melamed@IzabelaMelamed·
IonQ is actually part of the Genesis Mission. TVA was named, and TVA’s quantum program is built through EPB’s partnership with IonQ. The White House lists the agency nodes, not every private partner. If TVA is in, the companies working with TVA are included $IONQ
Martin Shkreli@MartinShkreli

everyone but Quantinuum (private) was left out of Project Genesis. $IONQ $QBTS $RGTI $QUBT $BTQ that's because AI doesn't intersect with quantum, at all

English
6
3
36
6K