رائد 💯💯💯

Islam is not a religion. It’s an ideology of hate and conquest. If someone tried to initiate a similar movement today it wouldn’t be allowed on hate grounds.

Kafirs can be mocked (Koran 83:34 86) disgraced (Koran 37:18 56) punished (Koran 25:77 42) plotted against (Koran 86:15-17 36) terrorized (Koran 8:12-14 88) made war on (Koran 9:29, 9:123 113) beheaded (Koran 47:495) mutilated (Koran 2:191 87) annihilated (Koran 6:45 55) killed (Koran 4:91 92) crucified (Koran 5:33 112) murdered (Koran 33:61 90) Read the verses yourself. So much for the religion of peace.

Probably true !!

עם הסכם, בלי הסכם - כל עוד אני ראש ממשלת ישראל, לאיראן לא יהיה נשק גרעיני.

@BingoAndBongo @realMaalouf In Quran nothing gets abrogated and please give reference of taquiyya

@MariSilverstein @realMaalouf Early mecca verses are abrogated by later violent medina verses. The prime role model in the religion, a murderous pedophile named moHAMmud, was completely morally bankrupt and wants all muslims to know the christians and the jews are the lowest of creatures. Nice try @ taquiyya

Islamic iman with a gun inside a mosque: “There is no better way of worshipping Allah than by killing an infidel.” I don’t know about you, but I’ve never seen a preacher of any other religion act this way!

A throwback to 2013 when a CNN reporter interviewed an Islamist who told her boldly how they intend to impose SHARIA LAW here, in Europe and the US. Permitting this rhetoric is what allowed the MUSLIM RAPE GANGS to operate for so long, STILL to this day. Wake up, they’re here!

When Muslims claim the bible has been corrupted, it’s just a cheap way of dodging the Islamic dilemma. Unlike the Quran, the bible is detailed and trustworthy.

The Islamic dilemma is the end of all arguments, allah inspired the dilemma himself.

@My3Jazmine @John316apologia @korrathetaymi @GodLogic_GL Please can you define what god is ?

@MariSilverstein @John316apologia @korrathetaymi @GodLogic_GL What made you think an eternal being became non-eternal temporarily?

The False DICHOTOMY of this Arabian Ninja 🥷 @korrathetaymi gets obliterated by Christian Apologist. @korrathetaymi you, Mohammed, Allah ans Islam can’t stop JESUS for being GOD. He was God, he’s God and he’ll always be God. Stay away from lies now. @GodLogic_GL

@DeenRatio x.com/iamufohunter/s…

It is strange that a religion now needs to be divided into violent Islam and peaceful Islam. The real question is simple: which Islam matches the Quran? Many Muslims grow up hearing only the peaceful parts, while the difficult verses are ignored, explained away, or never discussed at all. If someone wants to know whether violence has any basis in Islam, they should not start with terrorists or apologists. They should start with the Quran itself. The debate is not about what individual Muslims choose to practice. The debate is about what the Islamic texts actually teach.

@harrypotte3wte Sharia law is the only salvation of America

Do you agree with him??? Yes No

Islam means to submit Either you submit willingly or by force!

Muslims: Who was Allah before Muhammad? Allah was already known in Arabia before Muhammad. The Kaaba existed before Muhammad. The Black Stone existed before Muhammad. Pilgrimage to Mecca existed before Muhammad. Circumambulation of the Kaaba existed before Muhammad. So what changed? Muhammad removed the idols, but he kept the sanctuary. He kept the pilgrimage. He kept the Black Stone. He kept the circumambulation. He kept the destination. He kept the name Allah. If Islam is the restoration of Abraham's religion, where are these practices in the Torah? Where do Abraham, Moses, David, Isaiah, John the Baptist, or Jesus circle a shrine seven times? Where do they kiss a sacred stone? Where do they perform pilgrimage to Mecca? Where do they venerate the Kaaba? You won't find it. What you do find is that the core location, the core rituals, and even the name Allah all predate Islam. So the question remains: Did Muhammad restore Abraham's religion? Or did he take an existing Arabian pagan framework, remove the idols, and give the old practices a new theological explanation? 🤔🤔🤔

Islam is 1,400 years. It is the youngest of major faith traditions. Delusional 🙄

@John316apologia @GodLogic_GL

This Muslim couldn’t defend his prompt on JESUS is a Muslim VS @GodLogic_GL He tried his best to force @GodLogic_GL into his weird unsubstantiated ideology, calling Godlogic names and freaking out. Y’all are gonna enjoy how Godlogic puts him in his place. Dawah is deception.

“Believing in one God is monotheism, Islam is a package deal.”

No more arguments Everyone must decide who they will follow. Who is your King? Comment below. #خان_کو_قوم_کے_سامنے_لاؤ #christian

Jesus is just a prophet, so why do you say he is the Son of GOD? Are you saying GOD had a wife and had sex with Mary? You say Mary is the Mother of GOD. So goes the accusations - here is the response! We refer to Jesus as the ‘Son of GOD’ for three reasons: Firstly Jesus refers to himself as the Son of GOD: •John 10: 15 – Jesus refers to GOD as His Father •Mark 14: 36 – Jesus refers to GOD as His Father If GOD is His Father, then He is GOD’s Son! Secondly, others refer to Jesus as the Son of GOD: •Mathew 16: 13 – 17: Peter calls Jesus the Son of GOD. •John 20: 30 – 31: the author of John declares Jesus the Son of GOD It seems fair to assume they are repeating the claims of The Christ Jesus. Thirdly, GOD refers to Jesus as His Son Matthew 3: 13 – 17 – GOD [The Father] refers to Jesus as His son This is an ultimate stamp; that this title is appropriate. The title therefore is beyond dispute, however, we want to note an important point here: in each of these three examples, the term ‘GOD’; in ‘Son of GOD’ is a referent to the Father. We are not saying that Jesus is the Son of Jesus; or that ‘God (read as Father) is His own Son’ , we are saying GOD the Son is the Son of GOD the Father. Nor are we saying, as erroneously taught in the Quran, that Allah needs a wife to have a son; consider this Quranic blunder: To Him is due the primal origin of the heavens and the earth: How can He have a son when He hath no consort? He created all things, and He hath full knowledge of all things. Surah 6: 101 We do not believe that the sonship of Christ is connected to any physical union between GOD and any other - we find this idea as repellent and offensive as Muslims do- therefore we ask sincere Muslims not to lay this at our door (as to the insincere they are beyond our help). Christians teach that the divine Logos (The Word) was begotten (came from) of the Father, before Mary herself was created. Mary, who was named the ‘GOD bearer’ or ‘Theotokos’ at the Council of Ephesus, was called this to show that Christ was divine from the moment of conception; in attempt to steer Christians away from heresy. It was to show that the Christ was truly divine from the moment of conception that she had this title bestowed upon her; by the church. The history of this is lost on many; who speak on this title without knowing its historical context. This is not saying that Mary, is ‘mother of the Trinity’; but that she is the Mother of the incarnate Jesus Christ, because of and via His humanity. Note well; all Christians believe that the divine Logos created Mary! A man may be called the ‘son of the road’ because he has a certain relationship with the road if he is a traveller. Likewise, the Logos (The Word) is called the Son of the Father (GOD) because He is begotten (generated) of the Father’s substance; and because He (Jesus) calls Him (The Father) His Father on earth. We affirm, as Muslims do, that Mary was a virgin and the birth of Jesus was a miracle, therefore, the question of any sexual intercourse is out of the question for sincere students of truth. This begs however, the question – how the Quran could; given it is said to be from GOD almighty, get this so completely wrong! Furthermore, the Quran acknowledges that Allah could have had a son by adoption: ‘Had Allah wished to take to Himself a son, He could have chosen whom He pleased out of those whom He doth created: but Glory be to Him! (He is above such things.) He is Allah, the One, the Irresistible.’ Surah 39: 4 Therefore, we want you to note that, had Allah had a son, the Quran teaches that he would be worthy of worship: "Say: If (Allah) Most Gracious had a son, I would be the first to worship." Surah 43: 81 We are perplexed though as to why adoption by GOD would make a creature worthy of worship - why does Allah teach shirk? Are not adopted creatures still creatures! Surely no one would be worthy of worship except the uncreated creator! Why would Muhammad bow in worship to a creature, just because Allah adopts one as his son? Why does Allah say this through his Prophet! This makes no sense at all. Thankfully, we Christians do not say that the Christ is the Son of the Father because of adoption, but because He comes from the Father Himself as the divine Word that was with Him in the beginning; in the same way that fire begets fire – the two flames being distinguishable but the same in their properties and attributes: 28 I came from the Father and have come into the world, and now I am leaving the world and going to the Father.” 29 His disciples said, “Ah, now you are speaking plainly and not using figurative speech! 30 Now we know that you know all things and do not need anyone to question you; this is why we believe that you came from God.” John 16: 28 – 30 Christ is the unique Son of the Father as described by the term ‘monogenes’, a word used to refer to a special or unique ‘only child’ as in Luke 7: 12; 8: 42 and . Isaac is also described as ‘monogenes’ in Heb 11: 17 because he is the only son of the promise. And so we see that when Christ is described as ‘monogenes’, it is because He is a unique Son of the Father. This is clearly not by adoption as GOD has those kinds of ‘sons by the tons’, but rather in a unique way as the Word that springs from the Father in eternity past. The Church describes this uniqueness – in its sacred creeds and ‘begotten’; which in some translations of scripture went onto influence how the very term was translated; (though this was back to front thinking); thus when this was corrected in later translations by more culturally and historically aware scholars was often used by equally uneducated critics as some kind of reversal of doctrine which of course it was not. In conclusion, we call Jesus the Son of GOD because GOD does so, The Christ Jesus himself does so, and the Apostles do so. But we do not mean by this term anything as blasphemous as saying that GOD had a wife or had sex with a women. Nor do we mean anything as silly as the idea that the Father becomes His own Son. The relation in which the Son is of the Father; is spiritual, non-material, eternal, and from before all ages; a generation of being outside of time; in which all attributes and qualities are shared, bar the one distinction of begotten and source.