MemberoftheTribe

🚨 CHINA JUST GOT CAUGHT RED-HANDED The ship boarded by US Marines "was up to no good. The Touska was traveling from CHINA. The Washington Post says it was loaded with dual-use chemicals used to manufacture ballistic missiles." WATTERS: "Beijing just got caught doing us dirty, and Trump will make them pay."

CNN uses the "even his own officials" move. "Some Trump officials privately acknowledged the president's commentary has been detrimental." Anonymous and unverifiable. Perfectly placed to confirm the headline's premise. The article also mentions — one sentence, deep in the piece — that Iran may be "drawing out discussions as a play for time as it unearths some of its missile systems." Iran possibly re-arming during the ceasefire. One sentence. Trump's tweet timeline gets five paragraphs. 🤣 These people are sick in the head.

The whole story runs on anonymous sources. "Some Trump officials privately acknowledged..." "One person familiar with the talks..." "A source familiar with the discussions..." "People familiar with the plans..." This is how CNN builds a narrative. This is typical Anonymous Sources.

You don't hate CNN enough. Look what they did in this writeup. CNN: "A deal seemed close. Then Trump started posting." Translation: We're blaming tweets for Iran's behavior. CNN is siding with a terror regime. 🧵 I skimmed the article and it's loaded with malicious propaganda.

Want to hear something crazy? There is a NGO/nonprofit for every 175 people in California. There is $15,443 in NGO/nonprofit money handled per person in California. Imagine the fraud. Insane.

Food for thought. Iran Is Not Winning. It Is Unraveling. The prevailing narrative on Iran has it almost perfectly reversed. We are told that Tehran is winning a war of wills in the Gulf and that Donald Trump is gambling recklessly with the world’s most sensitive chokepoint. In reality, Iran is not consolidating strength; it is managing decline. And Trump’s play on the Strait of Hormuz has quietly forced energy markets to reprice security—tilting the balance decisively toward the Americas, and away from Europe, Asia and China. The Islamic Republic no longer resembles a confident revolutionary project. With the old clerical core leadership shattered, power has splintered between a camp that recognises a deal with the outside world as the only path to survival and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, a class of military dictators with guns, patronage networks and a rational fear that any genuine settlement will ultimately throw them overboard. This is not a unified strategy at work; it’s infighting, paranoia, a fragmented system in late-stage decay, crumbling under pressure. Into this fragmentation, the White House has introduced a form of calibrated coercion too often caricatured as impulsive. Around the Strait of Hormuz, Washington has threatened disruption without fully triggering it, forcing shipowners, insurers and policymakers to absorb a hard truth: dependence on vulnerable, seaborne Middle Eastern barrels is not a passing inconvenience but a structural risk. Iran can harass tankers and jolt day-to-day sentiment; it cannot rebuild a broken economy on sporadic shocks to global shipping. And the world must deal with the end of Pax Americana! The underlying playbook is anything but novel. Sun Tzu’s insistence that “all warfare is based on deception”, Machiavelli’s counsel that a ruler must manipulate appearances and exploit factionalism, and Alfred Thayer Mahan’s argument that sea power and control of chokepoints shape the fate of nations are not museum pieces. They are, in this case, the operating code. Trump’s opaque signalling, deliberate use of disinformation and visible but limited naval posture in and around Hormuz amount to a modern, Mahanian use of sea power as economic statecraft. Energy markets are already adjusting. Tankers are head to the Gulf of America. In a world where a single strait can a risk to economies is Europe and Asia, without ever being fully closed, assets tied to secure basins and diversified export routes deserve a premium. The Americas sit in an enviable position: vast, politically stable hydrocarbon resources, multiple pipelines and ports, and no dependence on a distant maritime chokepoint controlled by adversaries. By contrast, Europe, much of Asia and China find themselves downstream of vulnerabilities they do not control and regimes they cannot stabilise, exposed to shipping routes that can be threatened faster than alternative supply can be mobilised. All of this plays out against a domestic backdrop in Iran that looks less like revolutionary vigour and more like fear. A state that cannot safely keep its internet on, that must rely on public brutality to deter dissent, is not projecting confidence. It is signalling weakness, to its own citizens as much as to its rivals. Winston Churchill once remarked that “in war, resolution; in defeat, defiance; in victory, magnanimity; in peace, goodwill.” Iran’s leadership offers only defiance, without realistic prospects of victory or peace. The uncomfortable conclusion for those still insisting that Tehran is “winning” is that what they are observing is not the rise of a regional hegemon, but the protracted, strategically exploited unwinding of a brittle regime at the centre of an overexposed energy system.

BREAKING: New York banned fracking by executive order — then expanded the ban to every method of accessing natural gas. A father and son's 164-acre property sitting on a rich gas reserve, was rendered worthless overnight. We filed suit to stop this unconstitutional taking.

Iran is clearly employing a new comms strategy (ghostwriter?) targeting Wall St / investors. But he’s inadvertently conceding the key point: New York, not Tehran, is what matters. There's two embedded defeats in his own argument. 1) Yes, futures and spot markets diverge during crises. But the market will correct itself. And for that the pricing mechanism is more pivotal than actual supply. He also knows that the speed, cost, and direction of that convergence will be set in New York, not Tehran. 2) He’s saying that Treasury markets trade on pure vibes, whereas oil markets at least have benchmarks that refer to physical supply. But this is backwards: benchmarks are actually less data-heavy and less transparent, because they rely on editorial assessments from firms like Argus and Platts. By contrast, bond traders are the Wall Street equivalent of elite athletes, extremely data rather than narrative-driven, and operating amidst real data from transactions rather than editorial judgements, in markets that are at least 3-5 times bigger than the volumes traded in oil markets. If there’s one market that isn’t a house of cards, it’s U.S. Treasuries. Even if Iran can flex physical oil leverage, it cannot create a trusted, scalable alternative pricing or settlement system overnight. And unless that happens, pricing power and market direction will continue to come from New York, not Tehran, no matter how much of a house of cards it gets painted as.

This should be a national scandal. You can buy Mein Kampf on Amazon, but not an anti-immigration novel?

Every single time you see an anonymously sourced news article that is unflattering to a member of the Trump Administration, the anonymous “source” is someone in the government who is unhappy that a Trump appointee is pushing the agenda the American people elected Trump to push. 100% of the time, without exception. Also, the facts revealed by the anonymous “source” are always either lies, or gross exaggerations, or they leave out very significant facts that tell a different story. 100% of the time, without exception. Please keep this in mind when reading anonymously sourced articles.

When have they ever been first at attack their neighbors and when have they ever stolen land. That would be never. Not one war was started by Israel. Only terrorists and head choppers. Oh and they gave back land. Gaza, they willingly gave that away. They packed up their freaking dead. They literally took their buried out so that they could leave Gaza and greenhouses and $40 billion worth of international money so that they could prosper there and what did they do with that money? They elected Hamas. They spent all of it on rockets and weapons, and they proceeded to attack Israel nonstop. This is what happens when your entire view of geopolitics comes from Muslim brotherhood, propaganda, and Dugin.

Dear Candace Owens: We have the same lawyer. When I sued Harvard, we hired Mark Kasowitz. When you got sued by Macron, you too hired Kasowitz. Mark is a proud pro-Israel Zionist Jew. You are a low IQ demonic grifter who is too retarded to see the irony in this.

Q: "Which foreign country do you consider to be the US's "greatest adversary?" Kamala Harris in 2024: "I think there's an obvious one in mind which is Iran. Iran has American blood on their hands." Iran did not suddenly become not-a-threat.

Ben Shapiro eviscerates Megyn Kelly. “She was Pro-trans until the clicks changed. She was pro-Israel until the clicks changed. She was Erika’s “friend” until Candace’s audience mattered more.”

🚨 #BREAKING: The Supreme Court just ruled parents ARE allowed to opt their children out of being indoctrinated with LGBTQ+ propaganda HUGE WIN for religious liberty! Government Schools were attempting to EXPEL CHILDREN for this. FOLLOW AND SHARE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING

A scary datapoint on Ottoman genocide. If it weren't for the Assyrian Genocide, there would be 10-25 million Assyrians today. Today they are a scattered 2-4m. HALF their population was killed! It would have been a Christian Middle East. Not even counting Armenians & Greeks. - @AramaicWire

🚨 TRUMP HAS STUNNED THE "EXPERTS" AGAIN! US Steel is officially REOPENING its tin mill at Gary Works, Indiana — which got "indefinitely idled" under Biden due to foreign imports LFG! 🔥 US Steel CEO David Burritt: "This strengthens national security, economic security, job security...it's a WONDERFUL thing." TARIFFS WORK. @RapidResponse47

She really thought that when Charlie died they were going to come running to her and ask her to come back to TPUsa. That all she had done to them and Charlie was going to be forgiven. And that TRUMP was going to let HER have access to the FBI and all the evidence and work with HER on her conspiracies. She also explains here that since Erika became the CEO that she has the right to go through Erika’s entire life and pull it apart. No Candace you really shouldn’t have. You were just jealous they didn’t hire you back. She says “Alls fair in Love and War” What war Candace? Erika didn’t declare a war on you. You declared one on her. You really need help. Malignant Narcisst. She didn’t get invited back and Trump didn’t assign her to the FBI so now she’s decided to try and destroy Erika, Trump and TPUsa.

Candace Owens did her show today where she continued to harass @MrsErikaKirk. Notice anything from her show description today? No segment addressing how I totally destroyed her and exposed her?? No segment addressing how she hired Zionist lawyers after lying and saying Zionists are evil and they are “trying to kill her”? 🤡 Because she knows everything I said is true. What a cowardly woman. I hope Brigitte leaves Candace and her family homeless, shivering on the sidewalk in the cold.

Crazy story out of Qatar: A British couple honeymooned in Doha, where the wife was harassed at the Ritz-Carlton pool by two men who told her she'd "fall in love" after he slept with her. The hotel gaslit her, with management denying the CCTV backed her story despite their own WhatsApp messages saying the opposite. Her husband posted a TripAdvisor review calling the hotel "unsafe for women." The hotel got it pulled, then a hotel employee filed a defamation complaint against him under Qatar's cybercrime laws. Nearly a year later, when he returned to Qatar for work, he was detained, informed he'd been tried in absentia and fined, and then held for four nights in a deportation centre. The deportation order lasts five years, which severely hurts his career as a Middle East healthcare consultant. In other words, Marriott International, an American company, used Qatari law to silence a complaint about a woman being sexually harassed at their property.