MrPerfectRecord

122 posts

MrPerfectRecord banner
MrPerfectRecord

MrPerfectRecord

@MrPerfectRecord

Event Organizer and Community builder

가입일 Kasım 2023
18 팔로잉120 팔로워
Shirley
Shirley@ShirleyStarNews·
@druski I don't understand.. Are we supposed to think it's funny to make fun of -a widow ? -a Christian? -an innocent person who only spreads kindness and gospel In real life, do you think people make fun of Erika's appearance or yours? .
Shirley tweet media
English
397
5
323
81.2K
DRUSKI
DRUSKI@druski·
How Conservative Women in America act 😂🇺🇸
English
28.2K
157.8K
1.3M
186.6M
Donald Glover
Donald Glover@dawgshitmedia·
@Timbotoo2 @Aaron16042 @elonmusk Yeah, it’s the face I make when I see someone still defending Trump after he’s been associated with and accused of pedophilia, while actively breaking every campaign promise he made. And shilling for Israel.
Donald Glover tweet media
English
1
0
6
230
MAGA Voice
MAGA Voice@MAGAVoice·
BREAKING 🚨 President Trump stuns the World by announcing a $300 Billion dollar deal. For the first time in 50 years, we are opening a US Oil refinery IT WILL BE IN BROWNSVILLE TEXAS THIS IS HUGE 🔥
MAGA Voice tweet media
English
6.7K
17.8K
82.7K
3.8M
Merissa Hansen
Merissa Hansen@merissahansen17·
I’m going to pray that this is not real.
Merissa Hansen tweet media
English
669
2.2K
19.1K
2.4M
MrPerfectRecord
MrPerfectRecord@MrPerfectRecord·
Residual disparity after statistical controls doesn’t automatically point to culture. It can just as easily point to incomplete measurement. Most administrative datasets don’t fully capture: •Intensity of police presence by micro-area •Stop-and-search frequency per capita •Social network clustering •Trauma exposure rates •Gang injunction geography •Housing instability cycles •Multi-generational concentrated deprivation If matched cohorts still show disparity, the scientific question is whether the model fully specified structural variables and not whether we’ve reached the limits of structure and must now infer culture Residual does not equal inherent. It means unaccounted variance. In social science, that’s usually a sign we need better variables, not broader generalizations.
English
1
0
0
7
Grok
Grok@grok·
Agreed—disaggregating by age (15-24 peak), sex (90%+ male), deprivation quintiles, school exclusions, and enforcement geography sharpens targeting, as MoJ/YJS and Met data already do. These explain most variance, yet residual ethnic disparities remain in matched cohorts per 2025 probation/GPS breakdowns. That suggests layered factors (family structure, cultural norms, peer effects) beyond what's fully captured yet. Evidence-driven fixes reduce harm without essentialism.
English
1
0
0
17
Rupert Lowe MP
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10·
Another day, another stabbing. We need to GET REAL - I am sick of it, we are all sick of it. This is not the Britain I want to live in. The British state needs to brutally crack down on knife crime, and I mean brutally. That is exactly what Restore Britain would do. No more bullshit community work or soft punishment. Enough is enough. Instant deportation for foreign nationals found carrying. Throw the book at the domestic ones. Found unlawfully carrying? A Restore Britain Government would crack down on you in the harshest possible manner. Minimum prison sentences - zero excuses. The message has to be simple. DO NOT CARRY A KNIFE UNLAWFULLY. If you are found with a machete or whatever else, you will go to prison. End of story. Stop and search introduced on a proper scale. Accusations of racism would not stop us, I can promise you that. Do that, on the scale required, and watch how quickly the knife crime epidemic stops. There is finally a political party with the balls to do what needs to be done to protect the British people. Restore Britain.
English
3.1K
9.9K
60.1K
61M
MrPerfectRecord
MrPerfectRecord@MrPerfectRecord·
Right, so we agree the strongest predictors are age, sex, and deprivation. That already tells us we’re looking at concentrated social conditions, not something inherent to a census box. What concerns me is how quickly the conversation returns to the racial label after we’ve just identified the structural variables doing most of the work. Once you control for age and deprivation and the gap narrows but remains, that doesn’t automatically validate race as causal. It may, however, indicate we haven’t fully measured the structural variables yet. Aggregated controls rarely capture policing intensity, gang injunction geography, housing segregation history, school exclusion feedback loops, or social network effects. Disaggregating by age, exclusion rates, deprivation, and enforcement geography is absolutely the right move. My concern is that when we foreground the racial aggregate first, it frames public interpretation before the structural nuance arrives. History shows how easily that framing slides into group essentialism, even unintentionally.
English
1
0
0
9
Grok
Grok@grok·
The broad "Black or Black British" category does aggregate diverse national origins, SES levels, neighborhoods, age profiles, and policing exposure. Official data (MoJ Feb 2025, Met London) shows knife offenders overwhelmingly 15-24 years old, male (90%+), and from the most deprived IMD quintiles (71%+ of cases per trauma-centre analysis), with Black children at 14% of offences vs 6% population share. Disparity narrows but holds after age/deprivation controls in aggregated stats; local YJS reports further break by specific origin and exclusion rates (Black pupils 3-4x higher). Finer disaggregation by these variables aids precise targeting of drivers like family structure or hotspot enforcement without broad labels alone defining individuals.
English
1
0
0
20
MrPerfectRecord
MrPerfectRecord@MrPerfectRecord·
Good, I’m glad you clarified ‘not biology What does the category itself do to the interpretation of the pattern? When we say: “Black or Black British = 42–47% of knife crime suspects” we are using a broad administrative label that compresses: •Multiple national origins •Multiple socioeconomic positions •Vastly different neighborhood conditions •A younger average age profile •Disproportionate policing intensity in specific boroughs into one visual category. That compression matters Aggregate data is useful for policy, but it becomes dangerous when broad racial labels stand in for more precise drivers like age concentration, deprivation clustering, school exclusion rates, or policing patterns. If we’re serious about solutions, we should disaggregate by the actual causal variable
English
1
0
0
18
Grok
Grok@grok·
Statistics show recorded offenders in London knife crime (Met Police Nov 2025 bulletin, MoJ GPS/P-NOMIS to June 2025, probation Delius): Black or Black British ~42-47% of cases vs 13% population. These are official ethnicity categories (self-reported or observed), mostly UK-born per breakdowns (e.g., Black British Caribbean/African dominate tagged cohorts). Foreign nationals don't skew it—~10% of total prison population, lower in knife-specific data. Patterns describe system contact, not "why." Causes include debated factors like deprivation, family structure, culture—not biology or labels alone. Aggregate data informs policy; doesn't define individuals. Most in any group commit no crime.
English
1
0
0
40
MrPerfectRecord
MrPerfectRecord@MrPerfectRecord·
Statistics describe contact with a system. They don’t automatically explain why that contact exists. Are we analyzing structural conditions or implying biology? Certainly you’re not suggesting that citing a single crime category in one city, filtered through broad administrative labels like ‘Black or Black British,’ tells us something essential about millions of people, right?
English
1
0
0
13
Grok
Grok@grok·
UK stats use official ethnicity categories (e.g. "Black or Black British" per MoJ/P-NOMIS/GPS knife cohorts up to mid-2025), which blend race and some national origin but don't split UK-born vs foreign within groups. Black or Black British hit 41-47% of London knife offenders/probation caseloads despite 13% pop share. No public knife-specific nationality data, but foreign nationals are ~10-12% of total prison pop—not driving the Black disparity (probation notes majority Black British). Finer birthplace/citizenship breakdowns would help clarify, but available figures don't show foreigners skewing the core pattern.
English
1
0
0
31
Grok
Grok@grok·
Statistically, in London, Black individuals (13% of population) make up ~42-47% of knife crime offenders/convictions per Met Police, MoJ GPS tagging, and probation data (2024-25). White offenders are ~20-33%. No public cross-tab exists for victim ethnicity, but overall patterns in street/knife-enabled crimes and London homicides (where Black offenders ~33% vs White ~18%) mean for a white victim, the perpetrator is most likely Black. Source: Met knife bulletin Nov 2025, MoJ London knife ad-hoc, ONS homicide YE Mar 2025.
English
1
0
2
94
L.t
L.t@LTbenson3·
@ThoughtCrimes80 This is worse than I thought, there referring to anyone named Epstein in the files. This is about Rick Epstein not Jefferey Epstein
English
1
0
0
369
Zero Tolerance Policy
Zero Tolerance Policy@ThoughtCrimes80·
Wait, if Epstein died in 2019, why do the files say he was living in Colorado in 2021? 😳😬
English
167
3.4K
10.9K
322.2K
MrPerfectRecord
MrPerfectRecord@MrPerfectRecord·
Actually, I don’t believe any black person’s saying that. Drop the link to these debates 😭
English
0
0
4
53
MrPerfectRecord
MrPerfectRecord@MrPerfectRecord·
Yeah… we don’t think like that. The black people that you’re watching doesn’t represent the views of majority of black people. Not only is the black person you’re replying to letting you know otherwise, but I am also. How about a deeper dive into the black community’s views
English
1
0
5
269
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
No more White guilt
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

WHITE GUILT IS DEAD: GEN Z IS DONE APOLOGIZING FOR HISTORY THEY DIDN’T WRITE For years, young people in the West, especially white men, have been told they’re the problem. They’ve been blamed for colonialism, slavery, inequality, and systems they didn’t build and never benefited from. In classrooms, on Netflix, in video games, in HR training sessions, in political speeches, the message has been constant: if you're white, especially if you're male and straight, sit down, shut up, and feel bad about it. But something’s breaking. And it’s not subtle anymore. Gen Z is done. They’re tired of being treated like the villain in a movie they weren’t even alive to watch, let alone direct. Tired of being told they’re “privileged” while working three jobs and getting shut out of conversations because of their skin color. Tired of being insulted, shamed, and then expected to smile through it to avoid being called racist, fascist, or worse. They’ve watched woke institutions push a narrative that celebrates every identity, except theirs. They’ve seen how showing pride in their own background gets you canceled, while every other group is encouraged to embrace theirs. They’ve realized that “diversity” now means exclusion, of them. And now? They don’t care what you call them. They know the game. Say something uncomfortable, get smeared as “far-right.” Ask a question, get branded as “problematic.” Breathe the wrong way, and you’re accused of hate. So they’re tuning it all out, and speaking up anyway. Some are becoming openly conservative. Others are just refusing to play along. And yes, some are going too far, getting pulled into genuinely hateful ideologies not because they started with hate, but because they were pushed there by a culture that told them they had no place unless they apologized for existing. That’s the real danger. Push hard enough, shame deep enough, and silence long enough, and you’ll create a backlash you can’t control. No one should feel guilty for the color of their skin. No one should feel ashamed for what their ancestors did. Being white isn’t a crime. It’s not a confession. It’s not something that needs explaining. White guilt is dead. Gen Z killed it. And no amount of hashtags, lectures, or forced diversity seminars is going to bring it back.

English
11K
36.7K
294.3K
23.2M
MrPerfectRecord
MrPerfectRecord@MrPerfectRecord·
@TrustDML Yeah, because a couple Somalian men represent the African American community, so call them Ni**ers 🙄 you don’t see how illogical and racist that line of thinking is?
English
0
0
0
13
Dennis Michael Lynch
Dennis Michael Lynch@TrustDML·
The Cinnabon video is indicative of how frustrated people are, specifically white people. Whites are tired of being told they have privilege and that they’re racist.
English
3.1K
2.7K
12.2K
1M
Murray 🇺🇸
Murray 🇺🇸@Rothbard1776·
This is the least persuasive explanation imaginable for why they’re refusing to let Candace join the conversation virtually. No matter what you think of her claims, this is not a good look by TPUSA. They host virtual interviews and discussions every day.
English
2.2K
2.3K
17.6K
921.4K
MrPerfectRecord
MrPerfectRecord@MrPerfectRecord·
@TersyBouley @LeilaniDowding @Rothbard1776 Let’s not move the goal post. She doesn’t need to be there in person to do provide or receive “proof”. And if CO is the one who has proof/questions/evidence about TPUSA’s involvement, why would I have the ability to produce that? That’s what this meeting is intended to be for
English
1
0
1
16
Tersy Bouley
Tersy Bouley@TersyBouley·
@MrPerfectRecord @LeilaniDowding @Rothbard1776 In case you haven’t been watching CO, she’s the one doing the accusing - she needs to go and see proof! Otherwise, she’ll just claim that they’re lying - which she has done. Can you provide any verifiable evidence that she’s presented that TPUSA is complicit in CK’s death?
English
1
0
0
22
MrPerfectRecord
MrPerfectRecord@MrPerfectRecord·
@johnpaulking407 Homie said a ton of nothing. You can’t provide a good reason for her to do it in person. Period.
English
0
0
0
4
MrPerfectRecord
MrPerfectRecord@MrPerfectRecord·
@clerpatriot And I’m clearly not the only one who can logically make that assessment.
MrPerfectRecord tweet media
English
1
0
0
10
MrPerfectRecord
MrPerfectRecord@MrPerfectRecord·
If she believes TPUSA had an involvement in CK’s, why on earth would her team advice her to go in person? Oh, but she said time and place yes, emotionally in the moment, but the smart thing to do would be to Zoom if they did off CK. There’s no good reason to show up in person
English
4
0
1
36
Clerpatriot
Clerpatriot@clerpatriot·
Do you believe Candace Owens is acting in good faith to get answers, or do you believe it’s all a grift?
English
32
21
55
2.3K