Roberto Carlos d ́Ávila

Dia 1193 Todos os dias desses 4 anos irei postar a lista dos covardes que entregaram o nosso país a comunistas! As FFAA só irão servir para pintar meio fio e bater continência a bandidos VERGONHA COVARDES -Freire Gomes -Baptista Júnior -Hamilton Mourão -Gustavo H. Dutra

Try to understand one thing. NATO is not an extension of US foreign policy—and never has been. The idea that the United States should have automatic access to allied countries' bases reveals a dangerous misconception: an alliance is not submission. NATO is based on a simple principle of the North Atlantic Treaty: collective defense, not automatic obedience. Each country maintains its sovereignty. Every decision requires consensus. If an ally does not authorize the use of bases, this is not a "NATO failure." It is the normal functioning of an alliance between free states. Moreover, when the objective is common, NATO responds—as happened after the September 11, 2001 attacks. The real problem is not NATO. It is the expectation that all allies will align themselves, without question, with any US foreign operation. If this were the rule, NATO would no longer be an alliance— and would become a unilateral instrument. And that would destroy its purpose. — Statements like Marco Rubio's do not expose a weakness in NATO. They expose a misunderstanding—or an attempt to redefine the alliance on terms that were never its own.