Michael Surber 리트윗함
The math behind this is actually really fascinating, and it explains why the Left has to rely so much on institutional capture and mass migration to remain alive.
The children of Liberals adopt their worldview 89% of the time, while Conservatives see their kids adopt theirs 81% of the time.
But this advantage on the Left is dwarfed by the fact that they’re essentially an anti-catalyst movement.
We know that women have kids at a higher rate than men across the board, but Conservative men have kids at a higher rate than even Liberal women.
This means that ~59% of Conservatives become parents, while just ~31% of Liberals do.
That’s almost a 2X fertility advantage.
And when you multiply those numbers by the ideological detainment rate on both sides, you see that:
59% x .81 = 47.8
31% x .89 = 27.6
So that rounds to a minimum of 48 Conservative-aligned children per 100 Conservative adults, compared to a minimum of just 28 Liberal-aligned children per 100 Liberal adults.
Conservatives are reproducing their worldview at ~70% higher rate per adult than liberals.
And this is a minimum estimate because all our math here assumes that both the Conservable and Liberal families had only one kid, but we know Conservatives on average have much larger families.
The Left can’t compete with this organically, so they have to essentially steal the children of Conservatives through the education and media system (which they’ve all ideologically hijacked) and import new voters who will make up for their own collapsing birthrates.
If you ended all immigration and dismantled their dominance over education, the Left would be extinct in 20 years.
English
