Tim Tim

The problem with being "civically" English is it isn't a stable state. A nation of mostly Ghanians and Pakistanis and so on will within a few generations cease to have a civic connection to the old England. We've already seen the beginnings of this process as even ethnically English people have begun adopting foreign cultures. English cultural works from Tolkien, C.S. Lewis and Huxley are now on a 'Terror watch list'. Young people of various races across Western countries are adopting "road men" style and language. Anyone who thinks that you can have England and English culture without an ethnic supermajority of English people is deeply delusional. Trying to split the issue between culture and ethnicity is simply a way to cope with the fact that Western nations are being genocided

💥REPORT: Immigration Canada denies a French national (who speaks fluent English) a work visa for failing an English exam — but Indians and Muslims who can't speak a lick of either official language are fast-tracked into the country. Tom Mandala has lived in Montreal for seven years, studying at UQAM, but his work visa was denied on the grounds that he didn’t include language proficiency in either French or English. Mandala had to pass an English equivalency test at UQAM to obtain his diploma, but it wasn't recognized as credible by Immigration Canada.

🚨 Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson says he's going to "double down" on protecting illegal aliens from ICE even after the murder of Sheridan Gorman: "This tragedy is not going to deter us from our work."

"There are some crazy Christians in the American military, in the American government, that want to use this war to end the world. To force Jesus to return." —— Jiang Xueqin, Tucker's latest guest

An open letter to current Harvard faculty, donors, and trustees: I know you hate me. I know you hate President Trump. I know you think the enforcement of federal law is actually a conspiracy to overhaul higher education. I know you think the multiple conclusions of religious discrimination against Jews is a lie. But I am genuinely struggling to understand, irrespective of antisemitism, how the current disastrous state of the University has not resulted in tangible, meaningful reform. I implore you to answer basic questions about how you continue to choose to run Harvard University: 1. Why do you insist on paying Claudine Gay, an actual serial plagiarist who was forced to resign, a salary of $900,000 a year? 2. Why specifically should Claudine Gay of all people be teaching a class on leadership, using Harvard as a case study? 3. What specific merits and talents does Chairwoman Penny Pritzker bring to the table? What is the specific justification for keeping her? 4. For what specific reason is the University refusing to comply with federal law by not sharing the criminal background history of your foreign students to DHS? 5. Does it bother you that 97% of the faculty identify with one particular political ideology? If yes, what are two specific actions you're willing to take to rectify the problem? 6. What specifically have you done to ensure that the few conservative students left on campus aren't self-censoring their work and opinions? 7. Does it bother you that multiple faculty members, such as Professor James Hankins, admitted they or their colleagues were told that white men, in the post George Floyd backlash would no longer be hired if there was a (less qualified) black or gay applicant? 8. Thousands of donors, representing billions of dollars, have refused to give anymore since 10/07. What specific policy overhauls have you implemented to win them back? Irrespective of antisemitism, I'm genuinely struggling to understand why Harvard refuses to get out of its own way. This entire controversy since Day 1 has been entirely self inflicted and avoidable. Poor leadership after poor leadership...