고정된 트윗
“Sharing my SMC journey openly.
If you are into:
• Smart Money Concepts
• Prop Firm Funding
• Daily Bias
• Chart Psychology
Follow this account.
I share what I learn—no fluff, only real experience.
Let’s grow together. 🚀🔥”
English
Trusted Prop News
3.4K posts
Trusted Prop News
@TrustedPropNews
The home of Independent Prop firm news News | Reviews | Investigations Payout Cases •Industry Updates Follow to know what's happening
UAE 가입일 Kasım 2025
80 팔로잉6.2K 팔로워
🚨 30 DAYS. 30 PROP FIRM CASES.
Day 2: QtFunded
A trader has publicly alleged that @QtFunded rejected their payout after they posted about a pending payout on social media.
If that's an accurate representation of what happened, it raises some important questions.
Should traders be discouraged from speaking publicly about delayed payouts?
Can raising concerns on social media influence the outcome of a payout review?
Or is there additional context behind the firm's decision that hasn't yet been shared?
At this stage, we've only seen the trader's side of the story.
TrustedPropNews invites @QtFunded to respond publicly so the community can hear both perspectives before reaching conclusions.
Our goal isn't to attack any prop firm.
It's to document real trader experiences, seek answers, and provide fair updates as new information becomes available.
If QtFunded provides further context, we'll publish it with the same visibility.
Transparency requires accountability from everyone involved.
#PropTrading #PropFirms #Forex #FundedTrader
English
Hey! Hope you're doing well.
I've been following PropFirmScores and really like the work you're doing with the website and firm rankings. It's a useful resource for the prop trading community.
I think there could be some interesting opportunities for us to exchange ideas and explore ways to add even more value to traders.
Would you be open to a quick chat sometime? I'd love to hear more about your vision for PropFirmScores and share a few ideas I think could benefit both our platforms.
Looking forward to connecting!
English
Prop firm excuse bingo. Which one have you heard?
‘Under review’
‘Escalated to our risk team’
‘Awaiting compliance approval’
‘Please allow 3-5 additional business days’
Comment the one that’s happened to you 👇
English
🚨 TrustedPropNews Update: Why this case deserves a second look.
When we first covered this case, the information available publicly suggested the review was mainly about holding winning trades longer than losing trades. Naturally, that sparked concern among traders.
Today, after Hola Prime's public response, we have additional context—and it's important that we share it.
According to the firm, the review wasn't based on a few isolated trades. They say it considered the trader's overall behaviour, including high margin utilisation, repeated one-sided XAUUSD exposure, and a pattern of recovering losses through a small number of outsized winning trades.
Whether you agree with that assessment or not, it's information that wasn't available when the story first went viral.
Another key point: the payout has not been rejected. The account remains active after rebalancing, and the payout is still pending according to Hola Prime.
At TrustedPropNews, our goal isn't to decide who's right before all the facts are available. It's to ensure traders hear both sides, ask the right questions, and follow cases until there's a clear outcome.
Credit to @HolaPrimeGlobal and @Somesh_HP for responding publicly instead of staying silent. Open dialogue and clearer policies help everyone in the industry.
We'll continue monitoring this case and report any further developments—whether they support the trader's position or the firm's.
Transparency isn't about taking sides.
It's about making sure the full story gets told.
Trusted Prop News@TrustedPropNews
🚨 30 DAYS. 30 PROP FIRM CASES. Day 1: Hola Prime According to @HolaPrimeGlobal, this trader's payout was denied because the trading behavior was classified as gambling. Here's what the trading record reportedly shows: • 5 trades between June 5–8 • 3 losing trades, each limited to roughly $500–700 • 2 winning trades • Overall profitable The key point of dispute is that the trader held the winning positions long enough to capture a larger market move. Hola Prime considers this a rule violation. The trader argues it was simply following a risk-managed strategy: cut losses and let winners run. This case raises an important question for the community: At what point does holding a winning trade become a violation rather than legitimate trading? Share your opinion below. 👇 Follow @Armaan83876 for Day 2 and more real prop firm cases. @trustedprophub @theproptimes @PropFirmMedia @usepropX @HolaPrimeGlobal @HolaPrimeAfrica
English
@trustedprophub @HolaPrimeGlobal Once again Hola Prime proves their credibility
English
🚨UPDATE: @HolaPrimeGlobal breaks silence on the viral payout case.
Context matters. That's why both sides should always be heard.
The initial post made it look like this case was only about holding winning trades longer than losing trades, which naturally raised concerns across the community.
But after Hola Prime's public clarification, it turns out there was much more to the story.
According to the firm, the review wasn't based on just a couple of winning trades. It was based on the overall trading behaviour, including:
• Around 80% margin utilisation
• Repeated one-sided XAUUSD positions
• A pattern of recovering profitability through a small number of large winning trades after multiple losses
That's a very different picture from what was initially presented.
Also, one important fact: the payout hasn't even been denied. The payout date is still pending, and the account remains active after rebalancing.
Credit to @HolaPrimeGlobal @Somesh_HP for responding publicly, explaining their reasoning, and even acknowledging that some of their rules need clearer wording. Updating the FAQs and policies is a positive step for trader transparency.
As for media pages (including us), this is a good reminder that whenever a case goes public, it's always better to wait for both sides before forming a conclusion. That's how trust is built in this industry.
Trusted Prop News@TrustedPropNews
🚨 30 DAYS. 30 PROP FIRM CASES. Day 1: Hola Prime According to @HolaPrimeGlobal, this trader's payout was denied because the trading behavior was classified as gambling. Here's what the trading record reportedly shows: • 5 trades between June 5–8 • 3 losing trades, each limited to roughly $500–700 • 2 winning trades • Overall profitable The key point of dispute is that the trader held the winning positions long enough to capture a larger market move. Hola Prime considers this a rule violation. The trader argues it was simply following a risk-managed strategy: cut losses and let winners run. This case raises an important question for the community: At what point does holding a winning trade become a violation rather than legitimate trading? Share your opinion below. 👇 Follow @Armaan83876 for Day 2 and more real prop firm cases. @trustedprophub @theproptimes @PropFirmMedia @usepropX @HolaPrimeGlobal @HolaPrimeAfrica
English
BOGO40 is back. 🚨
For traders considering an instant funding option, this offer is worth a closer look.
Here's what it means:
✅ 40% OFF the Instant Goat Plan with code BOGO40
✅ If your first account reaches a reward, you receive a second account FREE
For example:
💰 25K Instant Plan
$318 → $190
At TrustedPropNews, we always encourage traders to look beyond the discount.
Before purchasing, review:
• Profit split & payout rules
• Consistency requirements (if any)
• Drawdown limits
• Reward eligibility terms for the free account
A good promotion can reduce your upfront cost—but understanding the rules is what protects your capital.
Trade smart, not just cheap.
English
Curious: What’s the MAIN reason you want a prop firm account?
A) More capital
B) Validation
C) Faster growth
D) Other (comment)
English
🚨 30 DAYS. 30 PROP FIRM CASES.
Day 2: Nexora Trades vs. NovaXTrade
A dispute has emerged within the prop trading community involving @NexoraTrades and @NovaXTrade (@risers343).
According to @NexoraTrades, account access was provided for a promotional collaboration.
They allege that during this period:
• The payout wallet was changed.
• Multiple prop accounts were accessed.
• Attempts were made to log into their email, X account, and Discord.
• Several password reset requests were triggered.
In a separate public post, @props_connect has also alleged unauthorized access to their account.
At this stage, these are allegations, and the full facts have not been established.
The key questions are:
• Was there unauthorized access?
• Was the payout wallet changed without permission?
• What evidence supports either side's claims?
If the allegations are inaccurate, this is an opportunity for @NovaXTrade to share their side and any supporting evidence.
The community deserves clarity before reaching conclusions.
Share your thoughts below. 👇
Follow @Armaan83876 for Day 3 and more real prop firm cases.
English
🚨 GIVEAWAY ANNOUNCEMENT 🚨
Lucid's new account is officially live! 🎉
If this post reaches 50 comments
we'll launch a giveaway for 10 FREE Lucid accounts.
Just comment "Lucid" below 👇
If we hit the target, the giveaway begins.
Let's see if the community can make it happen.
Lucid Trading@TradingLucid
No daily loss limit. Unlimited uses of 40% off. On new and reset LucidPro accounts. Twin (may I call you twin, perchance?) this promotion's gonna have some motion.
English
@stubbornmw @HolaPrimeGlobal That's what we want to protect your money before you traders spent on scam firms
English
@Armaan83876 @HolaPrimeGlobal Why unah like suffering? If the prop doesn’t worth it don’t go for it. Stop giving your money to these scammers
English
🚨 30 DAYS. 30 PROP FIRM CASES.
Day 1: Hola Prime
According to @HolaPrimeGlobal, this trader's payout was denied because the trading behavior was classified as gambling.
Here's what the trading record reportedly shows:
• 5 trades between June 5–8
• 3 losing trades, each limited to roughly $500–700
• 2 winning trades
• Overall profitable
The key point of dispute is that the trader held the winning positions long enough to capture a larger market move.
Hola Prime considers this a rule violation.
The trader argues it was simply following a risk-managed strategy: cut losses and let winners run.
This case raises an important question for the community:
At what point does holding a winning trade become a violation rather than legitimate trading?
Share your opinion below. 👇
Follow @Armaan83876 for Day 2 and more real prop firm cases.
@trustedprophub @theproptimes @PropFirmMedia @usepropX @HolaPrimeGlobal @HolaPrimeAfrica
English
English
🚨Seems There’s a ‘Hole’ in HolaPrime’s Transparency.
The trading community is demanding answers after a trader @kingposhi publicly alleged that @HolaPrimeGlobal rejected two separate payouts on a funded account.
According to the publicly shared evidence:
• The first payout was reportedly rejected over margin usage.
• After adjusting his approach, the trader says he reduced risk and traded more conservatively.
• A second payout was then rejected, this time under allegations of “gambling” and “bad risk management.”
🚨 $41,000 in Profits. Two Payout Rejections. One Growing Controversy.
So then, the obvious question is:
What exactly does HolaPrimeGlobal consider acceptable trading?
How does a trader receive a warning, adapt to it, and still end up with another payout denied under a different justification?
If firms can reinterpret profitable trading after the fact, traders deserve to know where the line is—and how it’s being applied.
This isn’t simply about one trader.
It’s about every funded trader placing trust in a firm’s rulebook.
Rules should be transparent.
Enforcement should be consistent.
Payout decisions should be backed by objective evidence—not uncertainty.
HolaPrimeGlobal now has an opportunity to address the concerns publicly.
If the trader breached the rules, explain precisely how.
If the decision is justified, publish the evidence supporting it.
The industry doesn’t benefit from silence.
It benefits from accountability.
Because once trust in payouts begins to erode, every trader starts asking the same question:
“If this happened here… could it happen to me?”
The community is watching.
So is PropWatch.
Facts. Accountability. Transparency.
@HolaPrimeGlobal @Somesh_HP @PropFirmMatch
Blacklion@kingposhi
Guys pls I need your help I don't know what to do again @HolaPrimeGlobal @Somesh_HP just rejected my payout again on my 300k account before payout date and reset my account again saying I made to much profit on a trade and flagging it as gambling and bad risk management. My first payout of $20k was rejected and my account was reset due to high margin use I than traded again using low margin and less risk after making $21k again with 3trades 1loss 2wins this people are telling me that I am gambling and over risking below is the video evidence of all the trade I took on gold @CableAnalyst @pips_daily @Temidire_right @UGOOOTWEETS @AU79executioner @ighotrades @B_trader__ @QueenTea__ @The_4thMan @SayLessFX @lex_consults @trustedprophub @PropFirmMedia @PropFirmMatch
English
@Jaro4x I can see why some people would react that way.
That's exactly why I shared the case—to encourage discussion. Everyone is welcome to share their perspective, and if Hola Prime provides additional context or clarification, I'm happy to include that as well.
English
What sort of joke is this?🤦🏽♂️
Trusted Prop News@TrustedPropNews
🚨 30 DAYS. 30 PROP FIRM CASES. Day 1: Hola Prime According to @HolaPrimeGlobal, this trader's payout was denied because the trading behavior was classified as gambling. Here's what the trading record reportedly shows: • 5 trades between June 5–8 • 3 losing trades, each limited to roughly $500–700 • 2 winning trades • Overall profitable The key point of dispute is that the trader held the winning positions long enough to capture a larger market move. Hola Prime considers this a rule violation. The trader argues it was simply following a risk-managed strategy: cut losses and let winners run. This case raises an important question for the community: At what point does holding a winning trade become a violation rather than legitimate trading? Share your opinion below. 👇 Follow @Armaan83876 for Day 2 and more real prop firm cases. @trustedprophub @theproptimes @PropFirmMedia @usepropX @HolaPrimeGlobal @HolaPrimeAfrica
English
@One_Gozietrades @dozie_Thetrader @HolaPrimeGlobal It's possible there are cases that never get shared publicly, but it's also important not to assume that's the case without evidence.
The purpose of this series is to discuss documented cases and hear different perspectives. If there are more verified cases, I'll cover them too.
English
@dozie_Thetrader @Armaan83876 @HolaPrimeGlobal Na mumu fo buy from them be that😂
Imagine all the other people they've denied that didn't bring it up online.
English
That's exactly why I'm starting this series.
The goal isn't to label any firm as good or bad—it's to look at real cases, compare them with the published rules, and let the community discuss them.
If similar cases keep appearing, they'll be covered. If firms resolve issues fairly, I'll cover those too.
Transparency benefits both traders and prop firms.
English
@Armaan83876 @HolaPrimeGlobal I've heard so much hype about Hola Prime, but when I go through their rules, I am surprised I don't hear about payout rejections on the timeline, cos those rules are simply ridiculous.
I'm not surprised, I've been waiting for this, and I expect to see more of such complaints
English
🚨 Beginner traders, let's settle this.
If you had to start your prop firm journey in 2026, which one would you choose?
1️⃣ GFT
2️⃣ FundingPips
3️⃣ Blueberry Funded
4️⃣ Blue Guardian
Vote with the number 👇
And more importantly...
Why?
Let's see how much you know?
English
@Armaan83876 @HolaPrimeGlobal This is a scam behavior if the firm doesn't pay
English
@Armaan83876 @HolaPrimeGlobal Come to futures mate, these CFD’s firm robbing people
English
@CyberMaster0x @dozie_Thetrader @HolaPrimeGlobal Let's see if they can help pr solve this issue @HolaPrimeGlobal
English
@dozie_Thetrader @Armaan83876 @HolaPrimeGlobal fr, this isn't backlion.
this is a different person with same issue.
@HolaPrimeGlobal is a scam firma and no one should buy from them
English