

WePlanet Denmark
1.7K posts

@WePlanetDenmark
Danish chapter of @weplanetint environmental movement working to liberate nature and elevate humanity






Die Branche der Erneuerbaren ist erwachsen geworden und muss jetzt Verantwortung übernehmen – systemisch und finanziell. Das schreibt Ministerin Reiche im Gastbeitrag in der @FAZ_NET. Wind und Sonne schicken keine Rechnung. Das Gesamtsystem aber wohl. faz.net/aktuell/wirtsc…










Sweden could freeze new power interconnections with the EU if the bloc does not change its proposed rules on congestion revenue and grids planning, its energy minister said on Monday. montelnews.com/news/7b1a7c5b-…








New OECD study: Nuclear + onshore wind is the cheapest path for Sweden The brand new @OECD_NEA system-cost study looks at how Sweden can meet rapidly growing electricity demand while reaching net zero. The conclusion is quite straightforward: "It is incontrovertible that both nuclear energy, including long-term operations and new build, and onshore wind will play the leading roles in any future least-cost capacity mix”, the NEA said in the report. In the base case for 2050, the lowest-cost system includes roughly: ⚛️ 13 GW nuclear 💨 30 GW onshore wind The base case for 2050 is supported by 20 additional sensitivity scenarios testing different assumptions about costs, nuclear construction risks, renewable output (including good and bad weather years), demand growth, trade and interconnections, system flexibility, and residual emissions. These scenarios expand the analysis and explore a wide range of uncertainties, but they do not fundamentally change the overall picture of Sweden’s future electricity system What’s interesting is that the total system cost stays similar across a fairly wide range of outcomes, roughly 8-19 GW nuclear and 10-55 GW onshore wind. In other words, there isn’t a single perfect mix, but most cost-effective pathways include a substantial amount of both technologies. The study complements a growing number of analyses pointing in the same direction. The most cost-effective way to decarbonize Sweden’s electricity system toward 2050 is likely a combination of nuclear power and wind energy.






