AdrianPK

Has the Amazon logo always looked like that? No, right? I had to open Alibaba in the tab next to it just to make sure I wasn't mixing them up.

Why do you think he left after 28 years? 👇

Not a personal policy, nor a thought-out one. I became a user of Apple and Anthropic products of my own accord, and I still use them mostly due to circumstantial reasons beyond my control. But no product or feat they promote sparks my curiosity enough to make me want to try it

@ZackKorman @AdamParsonz Honestly, I don't know how it's implemented. I only know it's provided to me that way, I've caught glimpses of a few dashboards, and it's clear that the harness occasionally requires re-authentication with new tokens.

@adrianpkstream @AdamParsonz If inference goes through bedrock you have the data, but as far as I’m aware it doesn’t do this analysis for you? I’ve never used it though so tell me if I’m wrong

As the cost of AI goes up, organizations are going to demand spyware levels of visibility. No one is handing you a $500k/year token budget without fully knowing what you’re doing with it and what the value is.

@ZackKorman @AdamParsonz Bedrock > CloudTrail. You probably don't need to beef up the MDM that's already installed on your corporate machine.

@AdamParsonz Spyware as a service

Seven or eight months ago, I wouldn't have said the same thing. Even with all my personal guardrails in place, it was often more frustrating to restructure code I hadn't written than to write it myself from scratch. That's no longer the case for me.

And for the record, I enjoy writing code by hand, and I still do it all the time in my learning and educational projects.

Imagine that you are a carpenter, blacksmith, artisan, or architect who has the ability to materialize a structure without having to go through the manual process of making it. Reluctantly, perhaps, I see that it is no different with code.

This is one of the things I hate most about modern luxury car interiors. Putting several separate display modules behind one giant black glass panel and pretending it is one seamless screen is not modern. It is the opposite. It is a workaround dressed up as innovation. Audi calls this kind of setup a panoramic display, but visually it still reads like multiple smaller screens packaged together. In a car priced like a flagship luxury SUV, that is not good enough. The digital interface should look expensive, integrated, and intentional. This looks like a cost-saving solution hidden under glossy black trim. Compare that with Cadillac’s newer interiors — the Vistiq and Escalade IQ — or Lucid Gravity. You can argue about the brands, but the screen architecture looks far more convincing: wide, clean, integrated, and actually designed as a central part of the cabin. That is what a modern luxury interior is supposed to feel like. German luxury brands need to stop assuming that old prestige will carry them forever. For decades, their interiors were the benchmark because the materials, ergonomics, engineering, and restraint all worked together. But the industry has moved into a digital era, and in that world, screens, software, UI, and visual integration matter as much as leather stitching and soft-touch plastics. Right now, some of these German interiors look caught between two worlds: too screen-heavy to feel classic, but not integrated enough to feel truly futuristic. And I am not even getting into the exterior design. The new Q7’s front end has the same nervous energy we are seeing across a lot of legacy brands: split headlights, overworked surfaces, and styling tricks that look less like confidence and more like panic. Some Japanese brands are conservative on purpose. They use older, proven technology because reliability is the selling point. You can criticize that, but at least it is a coherent strategy. What is harder to defend is charging luxury money while giving buyers digital design that already looks behind American, Korean, and Chinese competitors.

@slackerchef @TaraBull I don’t know, but it was an airbag explosion that caused that.

@TaraBull Since when is a Joker mouth attractive?

The line between rejuvenation and disfigurement is razor-thin. True beauty preserves identity not erases time through excess.

@VaibhavSisinty Without conduction or convection, getting rid of heat isn’t easier.

Okay this is genuinely insane. SpaceX just unveiled a satellite whose only job is to run AI. Not internet. Not GPS. Just compute, floating in orbit. It's called AI1, and the reason behind it breaks your brain. AI data centers on Earth are hitting a wall, not a chip wall, a physics wall. They need staggering amounts of power and water just to stay cool, and we're running out of grid and land to build them. So Musk's answer is: stop building them on Earth. In orbit, the sun never sets. Free power, 24/7. No water for cooling, you just radiate heat into the vacuum of space. The two things choking AI on the ground barely exist up there. And here's the wild part: Musk says it's easier to build than a Starlink satellite. Strip out the complex antennas and it's "a lot of solar cells, a radiator, and some laser links." One AI1 carries the compute of an Nvidia GB300 rack, the same hardware data centers fight over down here. AI1 is just the first one. The plan is a constellation of up to a million of them. And the timing isn't an accident, SpaceX goes public this week at a ~$1.75 trillion target. This isn't a rocket company anymore. It's positioning itself as the power grid for AI, in space. The race for AI compute just left the planet. Literally. @SpaceX

Solid observation. If the AI was as good as claimed, being twice the cost of a human would be a bargain. A tractor is more expensive than unskilled labor. You don’t see farmers backing away from their tractors.

@LittleKnownPL If the rain doesn’t ruin them tonight, I’ll post a picture later of the field behind my house. It looks like that too: yellow from the rapeseed, then red from the poppies.

I think the cool kids call this #polandmaxxing