Wilk

SHOCK FOOTAGE: Israel Has Now Set Their Sights On Villages In Lebanon, Leveling Them To The Ground With Gaza-Style Bombing Runs 🔴WATCH LIVE: x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

Today, Israeli settlers planted Israeli flags on the sides of the road leading to the Christian town of Beit Sahour in the West Bank from the Ush Ghurab area— a declaration of takeover. Israeli settlers have launched a campaign to ethnically cleanse Christians from Bethlehem and Beit Sahour, beginning with the establishment of an illegal outpost on Christian town land. Israeli officials and ministers attended the outpost's inauguration, praised the land theft, and promised more to come. This comes as Israel's finance minister declared last month that his plan for Palestinians (Christians and muslims) is ethnic cleansing, or what he called "voluntary migration." The Christian population in Palestine now makes up less than 1%, and many in the community warn that ongoing settler terrorism, land seizures, movement restrictions, and Israeli government policies are suffocating their lives and pushing their historic presence in the Holy Land to the brink. Christians in the Holy Land have been pleading with church leaders and Christian organizations around the world to act — so far, in vain. Following Israeli settlers' attacks on Christians in the West Bank since last year, only a few groups and individuals have stepped up to raise awareness about their plight, among them @Vulnerable_VPP and @JasonJonesVPP, who launched the Save West Bank Christians campaign and are doing vital work to bring their story to the world. But the ultimate goal remains: to stop the systematic plan to ethnically cleanse Christians from the Holy Land — and that demands action from world leaders, not just awareness. savewestbankchristians.com

Community note all you want, ironically the community note verified what I said, that the ATF report confirmed that the .30 caliber class bullet jacket fragment retrieved from Charlie’s body during autopsy is consistent with the .30-06 type of rifle used by Tyler Robinson, AND that the results of the ballistics analysis comparing the damaged bullet jacket fragment to a bullet test-fired by law enforcement from Tyler Robinson’s rifle was “inconclusive” in positively identifying OR excluding an exact match between the two because of how damaged the bullet jacket fragment is (typical in cases like this). I spent a whole episode two weeks ago explaining the “inconclusive” result and what it means, which can be found here: youtube.com/live/KP4wA0TpB… And my X post noted the updated info about the .30 caliber class bullet retrieved from Charlie’s body being consistent with the kind of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used to shoot Charlie Kirk. The question is, will YOU acknowledge what the ATF reports, that the .30 caliber class bullet retrieved from Charlie’s body is consistent with the kind of .30-06 rifle owned by Tyler Robinson?

It’s very important to note what tactic @RealCandaceO is using here, and why. She is deliberately misrepresenting my words, and for a reason. This is exactly what I posted: “The bullet jacket fragment recovered from Charlie Kirk’s body during autopsy matches a .30 caliber class bullet. The .30 caliber bullet matches the .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used to shoot Charlie Kirk. This per the ATF ballistics analysis. AND before anyone says “the ATF fabricated this”— This ATF report was filed by THE DEFENSE. Tyler Robinson’s lawyers aren’t denying this, they ADMITTED it by filing this report to the court themselves.” Let’s be very clear: the ATF report confirms the .30 caliber class bullet jacket fragment from Charlie’s body is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used to shoot Charlie. Which is what my original post was about. Candace claims my second sentence is claiming that the ballistics of the bullet jacket fragment retrieved from Charlie’s body during autopsy match the ballistics from the bullet that law enforcement test-fired from Tyler Robinson’s rifle. But that’s obviously NOT how anyone would interpret my words in the context of the entire post. (I also did an entire episode last week breaking down the “inconclusive” report and what it means). Which is why Candace selectively cherry-picked that sentence without the context to trick people into thinking I said something I didn’t. It’s the same tactic Media Matters uses to try to cancel conservatives. You’re familiar with it. The cherry-picked out-of-context quote that they portray to mean something entirely different. The only difference between Candace and Media Matters is Media Matters lies to trick advertisers to pull ad campaigns from their targets, while Candace is willfully twisting my words in order to distract YOU from the reality of the ATF report and how it devastates the entire house of cards Candace built by claiming Charlie couldn’t possibly have been killed by a bullet fired from a .30-06 rifle. But make no mistake, you SHOULD look at exactly what Candace doesn’t want you to see: The ATF report confirms the .30 caliber class bullet jacket fragment from Charlie’s body is consistent with the type of bullet fired by the kind of .30-06 rifle like Tyler Robinson’s rifle. And the DEFENSE filed this ATF report, which means Tyler Robinson’s attorneys aren’t denying this fact. Again, people are smart enough to recognize the nuance of the ATF report that finds that the bullet jacket fragment retrieved from Charlie’s body during autopsy is CONSISTENT with the kind of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used, while the “inconsistent” result refers to the inability of the analysts to positively identity or exclude specific ballistics markings on the damaged fragment with a bullet they test-fired from Tyler Robinson’s rifle.