奶油夹心兔

Hi everyone, welcome to take a look at what Korean readers in the original webtoon comment section really think about Kang Mincheol. These are all normal Korean readers who have actually read the webtoon~

我觉得全红婵被霸凌这件事至少说明一点，就是你是否被霸凌跟你是否优秀没有半毛钱关系，无论做得多好都没用的。 讨厌你的人永远能找到理由。你的优秀是你的罪证，你的缺点更是他们合理化自己行为的借口。 霸凌本质是一个逻辑封闭的系统，无论输入什么最后得出来的结论都是“你有问题”。寄希望于自己变得更好来摆脱霸凌，这种策略从根本上就是无效的。

我最该对自己确认的事，是我是否问心无愧，如果我做的是我认为对的事，至少我不该分出我的一部分站在指责我的对立面，又连同所有指责我的人一起对我本身实施一场围剿。如果我拿自己作为盾牌去抵挡飞来的刀，最后在刀飞向别人的那一刻，我该记住的是“刀在谁手里，谁就是凶手”，而不是“我的盾不够硬不够大保护不了所有人”，更不是“对方是个见人就乱砍的疯子所以我所做的是徒劳的也是牵连他人的” 人总是倾向于把愤怒发泄在“安全”的对象身上，因为直面真正的施暴者意味着要战斗、要承担风险、要承认自己也在恐惧中沉默了太久，一旦我会反思，会内疚，我将会是那个可以被扣帽子的人，安全、并且不需要任何代价 但反击是我的本能自卫，即便我迎下一击并扇了回去，这也不叫公平，因为我本没有想要争斗，主动去冒犯的不是我，我只是被迫需要挡下；换来对面更狠更卑劣的、甚至误伤队友的攻击，而之所以对面能这样疯狂加码，是因为被一次次还手时的“我不吃这一套”打痛了，这是他们选择的报复路径，不是我策划的误炸，更不该怪罪我的徒劳，因为哪怕在孤身一人的时候我也从未选择沉默 谁是麻烦的制造者，谁又是麻烦的发现者，站在暴风雪下点一束火，火灭了，我要说的是因为暴风雪太大了，还是因为火不够热，至少所有事情，问完自己以后我比谁都更清理 这说明我还没被暴徒所驯服，在还手的那一刻我不是想让结果变轻，而是在告诉自己我没有接受这个结果，是在过程中不断创造意义去否认那所谓的结果，哪怕暴徒在乱砍中因为伸手的阻挡而砍得更凶，亦或是不伸手他只是砍两下再走——我为什么要用正常人的思维去推算一个疯子的下一步，又为什么要因为赌输了一次去认定我当时不该伸手 是，没人要求我站出来，但别人求我去做的，那叫任务，而我看不下去、忍不了、觉得不该这样，于是去做了的，这叫良知。不是“被要求而行动”，而是“没人让我做，但我觉得不对，所以我做了” 我从来没有被压回过沉默里，所以我不会再听任何指责我的声音

Why some camera angles can make me feel uncomfortable: The clip from the first image is taken from Don't Talk to Strangers, exposing the brutality of domestic violence and its harm to victims. The camera is aimed almost entirely at the abuser, capturing his actions, expressions, and words, forming a complete and brutal portrait of him. What the audience remembers is the violence of the abuser. But when the camera focuses on the victim, all we see is a woman being humiliated—her pained face, exposed skin, her trembling in fear without the strength to resist. Everything is magnified by the lens, laid bare before the public eye. What the audience remembers is the suffering of the victim. The camera that could be directed at the cruelty of the perpetrator instead fixes on the vulnerability of the victim, transferring pain and a shaming gaze onto the woman, using close-ups to turn her into an object of humiliation for consumption. That is the source of the discomfort. The camera has its own language. Whoever the camera focuses on is whom the audience looks at. When the camera lingers on the victim’s pain, while the abuser is only briefly mentioned or not even in the frame, the camera itself is doing something cruel: turning the victim’s suffering into a consumable spectacle while allowing the abuser to remain invisible. Under such camera work, the audience’s attention is drawn mostly to “how much the victim suffers” rather than “how evil the abuser is.” This kind of focus on the victim is not a judgment of the perpetrator, but a gaze upon the victim. A reasonable portrayal of violence should focus on the abuser’s hands, expressions, and posture, making the audience feel that the sense of oppression and fear originates from the abuser—not merely making viewers feel the victim’s pain from across the screen. Of course, as some might say, other comics have even more of these tropes, yet I only mention this one. So let me ask you: if someone is beaten, would you say, “But others are killed in the world, so why are you crying over a beating?” If someone says, “The water here is dangerously deep,” would you step in and say, “The sea over there is deeper, and you’re ignoring it”? As long as something worse exists in the world, does that mean no one is allowed to complain about what’s right in front of them? As if pain is a competition, where you only get to speak if you win a medal. The reason I chose this particular work is that I’ve been a reader of it for a long time, and it’s the only one I know well. I am not obligated to rank all the comics in the world by “severity of harm” before I earn the right to speak. I don’t need to compare every other comic you tell me contains even worse elements just to conclude which one is more problematic. I only need to tell you: “I’ve only read this one, and it made me uncomfortable. Because I saw it, I spoke.” Moreover, in this comic, I probably don’t need to say much more—over nearly a hundred chapters, how many romanticized shots are focused on the ex-husband who humiliates this woman, showcasing his “savior” image from his student days? And how many people have even used that as a defense for his violent actions?

"Other comics have more scenes like this, but you don’t mention them."— that’s not reasoning. That’s using other people’s suffering to silence someone. As if, just because there’s something worse in the world, you don’t have the right to cry out about the bad thing right in front of you. Pain is not the Olympics. You don’t need a gold medal to be allowed to speak. As for the other comics you mentioned, I've never been their audience. But the one I'm talking about—I've been a legitimate reader of it for nearly a year, and I've made multiple paid purchases for merchandise and commissioned fan creations.

@MahjabinKh008 @scaraameow @taehassimp @akanegirly If you can't see that the majority of this webtoon's highlights are given to the male characters, while the female characters are always the ones being subjected to suffering and objectification, then suit yourself.

@scaraameow @taehassimp @akanegirly @chenluox Bro how can the post publisher even say tht,like its an 18+ manwah vruh

The worst thing about this manhwa is the author's constant narrative of putting female characters through suffering and the glorification of trashy characters. The camera of misery is always focused on women — that's what you should be concerned about, not her body shape.

@MahjabinKh008 @scaraameow @taehassimp @akanegirly In the so-called dark webtoons you're talking about, they clearly have the ability to show the ruthlessness and ruthlessness of the perpetrators, yet they choose to focus the camera on the female lead's suffering, portraying her humiliation and trembling.

@Shauryarahman65 You, who keep saying that even perpetrators have lives that need to be forgiven, and that victims must forgive their abusers to be truly kind—otherwise they're guilty—really are persistent, aren't you?

@chenluox No one thinking about her first husband suffering and situation in manhwa He also suffer definitely he done wrong but he make like that because society thinking make him like that.

@OneBleach54546 Are you asking about the third webtoon in the image from the original post? I don't know that one. You might need to ask under the original post.

@chenluox What's the third series in the picture?

@akanegirly @everythlngbws Yes, the author is a woman, and you — who disgustingly pretend to be a neutral, reasonable voice while constantly defending your trashy Kang — are more misogynistic than all of these people. Don't put on your act here with me.

@everythlngbws @chenluox It’s a woman and even if it was a man ? You’re criticizing men for being misogynistic but you guys aren’t better with your misandrist comments

@akanegirly @taehassimp Kang's fans really are just like Kang himself — always shifting the blame onto everything and everyone. The way you whitewash a trash person is by trying to find something even worse. You're the last group of people who have any right to act like neutral, reasonable voices.

@taehassimp @chenluox Meuf tu exagères. Mincheol a des fans et ? Mdrr. Vous etes trop hypocrite les fans de Tears. Vous kiffez le daron ou meme Taehee mais les fans de Mincheol vous les critiquez a gogo. Voir ses fans tomber ? Tu vas pas bien wesh. C’est pas la première fois qu’un antagoniste a des

@akanegirly @taehassimp Do you think I don’t remember the things you’ve said? Want to see the screenshots?Early on, you were making snide remarks about Taeha’s flaws, yet you kept feeling sorry for Kang and whitewashing everything he did. Do you really think people don’t know who you are?

@taehassimp @chenluox fans dans une histoire. Vous en faites bcp trop, a croire que vous vous croyez supérieur aux autres mais je tiens a te rappeler que Taeha est aussi toxique que Mincheol. Y’a pas de green f’ag dans cette histoire 💀 Faudrait redescendre un peu la

@akanegirly @taehassimp When did it become your turn, you most misogynistic group of fans, to speak here? I’ve cursed out those two trashy people you mentioned, and even more so, I’ve cursed out Kang, the worst one you defend the most. Don’t try to pin labels on me and put on an act here.

@akanegirly @taehassimp You, a fan of Kang, what are you pretending for? The reason you keep speaking ill of Taejoo and Taehee isn’t because you’re righteous, but to defend your favorite Kang. You’ve also been leaving comments under other people’s posts before—don’t act like I’ve lost my memory.

@ManakaYuuki0 没关系，你可以有你的观点，只是我不认同作者在叙事方式上的很多细节，不过只要你还喜欢这个漫画那就等待便好

@chenluox Sorry Chen 😭 I suddenly became really passionate about how much I want 🥕 to suffer and die while Haesoo flourishes

The reason you feel pain in your heart is because it's your karma. You've been harassing others for a whole year, even inciting your online followers and real-life friends to doxx and bully me three times. I will get back at you for everything you've done. You just wait, Koi❤️

@taehassimp Then good luck to you.

@chenluox L’auteur nous montre juste ce que HaeSoo a vécu avec ce connard. La fin de ce déchet est proche et l’auteur nous le montre dans ces derniers chapitres. Nous allons enfin le voir tomber. Lui, et ses fans.

这个小书雨明明自己也不是小太阳却还在努力发热把暖意分享给他人哎哟

@MouYu21612 @ImLRiDec 超绝钝感力，我前几个月就已经在骂了那时候我还是被踩的，回旋镖这一点😂

@chenluox @ImLRiDec 难得的是，韩网读者终于受不了在评论区开喷了😅

啥啊這是最新更新的一回嗎 好了就好了，為什麼常常特寫海秀因為渣男受苦的感覺物化的畫面⋯-.-

负分男与满分女