Richard

158 posts

Richard

Richard

@coexist4better

가입일 Mart 2026
1 팔로잉45 팔로워
Richard
Richard@coexist4better·
The above post is a great example of political prejudice. The statement that Republicans cannot solve all your problems is probably true with high statistical reliability. The next statement about Democrats being mostly the cause to all of your problems is what Ellis would define as a cognitive distortion. Republicans have added $3-5 trillion to the debt this term. Democrats have been just as irresponsible with the debt historically. Neither party has balanced the budget since the Clinton Administration. Both parties have made their mistakes domestically and with foreign policy. They continue to blame each other with toxic uncivil language, to the point they avoid compromise, seemingly out of spite. Voters can and need to do better. More Americans benefit whenever the parties compromise. To do that, we need to elect open minded people. On a personal level, if someone is unhappy in life, it is best to look at ones own choices first, before looking to blame others.
English
0
0
0
2
Sassafrass84
Sassafrass84@Sassafrass_84·
This is true. We need America First Conservatives.
Sassafrass84 tweet media
English
115
442
1.4K
9.5K
Richard
Richard@coexist4better·
@smerconish @JohnFetterman Unfortunately, both political parties are financial liabilities when you consider they have not balanced the budget since the Clinton administration, and we're now $38+ trillion in debt. We are paying a $ trillion just in interest on our loans.
English
0
0
0
5
Richard
Richard@coexist4better·
The earth needs a break from human population growth which continues to use up more resources than it replenishes. The Earth also needs a break from continued human pollution. If the human birth rate maintains 1.5 for the next 6 generations, human population will drop below 1 billion. This will give the oceans and other wilderness areas time to rebound with wildlife. It will give humans time to clean up their pollution and find and build better clean energy infrastructure. Because of our warming trend with climate change, some agriculture lands will continue to be lost to deserts. With less people on the planet (compared to 8 billion), food distribution won't be the emergency as it is now in some parts of the world. Having said that, economies will struggle with aging populations and fewer workers paying taxes for services. Humans will have to adopt to a healthy mix of capitalism and socialist programs to care for the elderly and disabled.
English
0
0
0
9
Richard
Richard@coexist4better·
Use gum rubber first and push it into the hole. Then use an adhesive tire patch on the inside. You have to rub the patch very smooth. Best use a rolling tool on the patch. From the picture given, a plug will not work because it is in the sidewall. Gum rubber is a not a permanent fix but it will buy you some time.
English
0
0
1
5K
Richard
Richard@coexist4better·
It is about services. Property taxes are a wealth tax. We can do away with them, but governments will have to find another way to replace the lost revenue in order to pay for services like police, courts, fire, streets, utilities, schools, etc. What do you suggest governments tax instead to balance their budget and pay for those services?
English
1
0
0
14
Renee
Renee@TexasCowgrl1111·
Hypothetically…….. I’m being taxed on money I never made. Let that sink in. If I bought my property outright for $60,000 in 2009 Now the county says it’s worth $246,000. Did I sell it? No. Did I make a profit? No. Did I get a check for $246,000? No. But my taxes jumped like I did. That’s the problem. This isn’t income. This isn’t cash. This is a number someone decided on paper — and now I’m being billed for it. If my stock portfolio doubles, I don’t pay taxes until I sell. If my income doesn’t increase, I don’t magically owe more income tax. So why does owning a home work differently? Why am I being taxed on unrealized gains? A house isn’t just an investment — it’s where people live. And this system means you can do everything right, pay off your home, and still get squeezed harder every year because of a number you never turned into money. You don’t truly own something if you can be taxed out of it. This isn’t about “services” or “inflation.” It’s about being charged for value you never received. And people are starting to notice. This needs to be on everyone’s mind✔️
English
1.9K
12.8K
37.8K
776.6K
Richard
Richard@coexist4better·
Sidetracking questions, denial, projection of blame, lying, exaggerating, minimizing harm, are all manipulations used by common criminals to escape responsibility. Trump is not the only elected official who uses these. As voters we need to do better and elect ethical people to office.
English
0
0
1
612
James Tate
James Tate@JamesTate121·
I cannot unsee this. I've been watching Trump answer questions for years. The confidence. The certainty. The way he shuts down a room. I genuinely thought he was one of the sharpest communicators alive. Then one day I caught myself finishing his sentence before he said it. Not guessing. Knowing. Word for word. Before he said it. So I pulled the transcripts. Press conferences. Interviews. Sprays. Egg prices. Greenland. January 6th. Military strikes. Different years. Different reporters. Completely different topics. Same thing every time. Every single time Trump is asked a question — any question — he runs the exact same 7 steps. In the exact same order. Without exception. This is not personality. This is not confidence. This is not charisma. This is a deliberate repeatable formula. And I can prove it. His actual words. Public record. Verify every single one yourself. 📷 STEP 1 — KILL THE QUESTION (First thing every time — make the question itself the problem.) 📷 "That's a stupid question." / "Fake news." 📷 STEP 2 — KILL WHO ASKED IT (Destroy the source so the question has nowhere to stand.) 📷 "Your ratings are terrible. Nobody watches your network." 📷 STEP 3 — INSERT HIMSELF (Every topic. Every time. Without fail. It always lands here.) 📷 "Nobody has ever done what I've done." 📷 STEP 4 — SCALE IT TO THE BIGGEST CLAIM POSSIBLE (Not good. Not great. The greatest. Ever. In history. Every single time.) 📷 "More than any administration — by far." / "Nobody has ever had crowds like I've had — in history, for any country." 📷 STEP 5 — UNNAMED PEOPLE AGREE (Faceless. Countless. Unverifiable. Always there.) 📷 "Smart people are saying it. Great people. A lot of people." 📷 STEP 6 — VAGUE THREAT (Something bad will happen. Never specified. Always implied.) 📷 "All hell will break out." / "They know it. Believe me." 📷 STEP 7 — LOOP BACK TO HIMSELF (Different words. Same destination. Formula complete.) 📷 "It's been an amazing period of time. Page after page of accomplishments." The question was never answered. The formula just ran. Go back and watch any clip. Any year. Any topic. Any reporter. Count the steps. I'll wait. This is the part nobody wants to sit with: Real conviction engages with the actual question. It sometimes stumbles. Sometimes says I don't know. It changes shape based on what's in front of it. A formula runs the same 7 steps whether the topic is war or egg prices. Which means the response was never built for the question. It was built for you. To feel powerful. To feel certain. To stop you from noticing that nothing was actually answered. And it worked. For years it worked. Pull any transcript. Public record. Count the steps yourself. This isn't about politics. This is about what you were never supposed to notice. I've found the same deliberate pattern running in another major figure in this administration. Different slots. Same principle. Same effect. Next post I break it down. Follow or miss it. VIA~~ Jamie Hoo
James Tate tweet media
English
856
4.6K
10.9K
416.3K
Richard
Richard@coexist4better·
@travelingflying If immigrants uphold all the laws and become law abiding, does it matter?
English
1
0
0
634
Taya
Taya@travelingflying·
Andrew Tate: ”The average White family has a different approach towards their financial stability and their emotional investments towards children. Third worlders will just have kids; they won’t say, “Can I afford to have this kid?” They will just have kids. When you let them into a country you have to be prepared for them to have more children than the native population. They will outbreed the natives. If you let in 10% of third worlders it is 10% for a while but not for long. The only possible end result of this is the absolute replacement of the native population. Which then begs the question: is a country a place on the map and a name or is a country the people who live in it? I would argue that if you replace all the British people with people from somewhere else it doesn’t become Britain anymore. If you took all the Norwegians and replaced them with Indians, would it be Norway? I don’t think it would be.” He is right.
English
157
1K
9K
542.2K
Richard
Richard@coexist4better·
It might have started sooner than 1973. In 1953 our CIA and British MI6 engineered and pushed a coup that took out Iran's democratically elected president. As a result Britain regained BP that Iran had nationalized and America got some control of oil exports. The Sha, who had been the figure head Monarch in 1953, replaced the president and took absolute control. Although he modernized the country, in time he became a very repressive dictator, angered traditional clerics, which ultimately led to the 1979 revolution.
English
2
1
2
48
Richard
Richard@coexist4better·
@vlogging_sam @TheRabbitHole What ever the true numbers are does not really matter in the grand scheme of things. Slavery was inhumane.
English
1
0
0
546
Vlogging with Sam 🇮🇱🇵🇸
@coexist4better @TheRabbitHole This post is talking about the 13 colonies specifically. You’re talking about the americas as a whole of which Brazil received the most along with the Caribbean in second. I believe the US received around 300k-500k which is less than the number you showed
English
1
0
2
561
The Rabbit Hole
The Rabbit Hole@TheRabbitHole·
Thomas Sowell on the complicated history of slavery
The Rabbit Hole tweet media
English
657
2.8K
9.6K
26.8M
Richard
Richard@coexist4better·
Interesting. Some physicists believe our bodies continually exchange molecules and electrons with the clothes we ware, the chairs we sit in, the gardens we create, everything we come in contact with. When we leave a place, we leave a trail of molecules behind. If that is true, perhaps that explains why when something we spent time with gets ruined or dies, we also grieve spiritually, as part of ourselves dies with it.
English
0
0
1
1.2K
ゴッホ。
ゴッホ。@goho___·
知らなかった。妊娠すると、赤ちゃんの細胞が27年以上、母親の体の中に生き続けるらしい。                                                                                                    「マイクロキメリズム」と言って、妊娠中に胎盤を通じて赤ちゃんの細胞が母親の血液に入り込んで、臓器や脳にまで定着するそう。2012年のワシントン大学の研究では、調査した女性の約63%の脳から赤ちゃん由来の細胞が見つかってる。 しかもこの細胞、ただ残るだけじゃない。 母親の心臓や肝臓がダメージを受けたとき、赤ちゃんの細胞がそこに集まって、組織の修復を助けてくれる。 細胞レベルで母を守ってくれてる。 そしてもう一つ、流産や死産になった赤ちゃんの細胞も母親の体に残る。 妊娠って細胞レベルで、永遠にお母さんになる、我が子とのつながりは一生モノ。 親子の絆は細胞レベル、尊すぎる...
日本語
1.1K
15.9K
137.4K
20M
Richard
Richard@coexist4better·
@oelma__ June has just 30 days, not 31 or 37.
English
0
0
0
249
Elma
Elma@oelma__·
What is wrong in this picture?
Elma tweet media
English
1.1K
18
189
18.3K
Richard
Richard@coexist4better·
If negotiations fail, Congress has to make that authorization, so the military does not have its resources all tied up. We will have to clean up Trump's mess. A negotiated peace is really the best option, one similar to the previous treaty where Iran was permitted to have nuclear power for nonmilitary purposes under supervision and observation. Otherwise, we will be there for years, killing and dying. Unfortunately, our diplomats have questionable skills, when you consider how they speak to our trusted allies. Hopefully, they won't be as insulting.
English
0
0
1
24
Michael Smerconish
Michael Smerconish@smerconish·
Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Should Congress authorize the use of military force against Iran? As tensions escalate and a fragile ceasefire nears expiration, Michael Smerconish breaks down the legal, political, and strategic stakes behind a potential Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF). Download & Listen Now: link.podtrac.com/smerconishpod
English
34
0
13
3.4K
Richard
Richard@coexist4better·
@RepOgles Americans are in deep trouble if they elect people who can only see two options to a problem/situation. As voters we can and need to do better.
English
0
0
5
232
Rep. Andy Ogles
Rep. Andy Ogles@RepOgles·
America goes two ways. Option A: Muslims and globalists institute THEIR laws on our society. OPTION B: Christian men stand up and take their country back. I’m going with option B.
English
2.9K
7.1K
24.7K
270.9K
🌚
🌚@Wthmoni·
Don’t cheat… just answer 😤
🌚 tweet media
English
20.8K
519
8.4K
1.8M
Richard
Richard@coexist4better·
Many Americans are afraid of socialism because it brings on thoughts of communist countries who violated human rights. Socialism is not the same as communism. In the U.S. we are capitalists, but we have adopted many socialist programs without violating human rights. Those programs include Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, Veterans Administration, FEMA, public schools, and many more. With an aging population, declining birth rate, mass deportations with fewer tax paying workers and paying customers to our economy, we may need more socialist programs to care for the elderly and disabled. This is not saying we give up on capitalism. Free enterprise is crucial to a healthy economy and national human spirit. Unfortunately, capitalism is dependent upon population growth and expanding markets. With tax cuts, human services need to be cut to balance the budget, or we go further into debt. We are now $38+ trillion in debt. Over the last several decades, both Democrat and Republican administrations have put our children and grandchildren in the worst financial position. Our current administration has added $3-5 trillion to the debt and is asking for a trillion more for the military.
English
0
0
0
7
Richard
Richard@coexist4better·
@KeruboSk Probably most baby boomers have talked with someone born in the 1800s. My grandmother was born in 1889.
English
0
0
1
729
Sophia ❣️
Sophia ❣️@KeruboSk·
Just out of curiosity… who out there has actually talked to someone born in the 1800s during their lifetime?
English
10.2K
319
11K
975.6K
Richard
Richard@coexist4better·
@AveryDaye It appears you have a misunderstanding what most liberals want. Keep listening.
English
0
0
0
6
Avery Daye
Avery Daye@AveryDaye·
It’s so easy to be a liberal. Everything sounds nice in theory… “open borders, people just want a better life” “Tax the rich so things are less expensive” “Free healthcare for all” …but it falls apart in practice. The liberal way of thinking is lazy and lacks a greater understanding of how things actually work. It’s about virtue signaling instead of working to problem solve for the best idea.
English
407
1.1K
9.9K
145.9K