daphne ๐Ÿฆ‹๐Ÿฆ‹ (parody)

15 posts

daphne ๐Ÿฆ‹๐Ÿฆ‹ (parody)

daphne ๐Ÿฆ‹๐Ÿฆ‹ (parody)

@daphachar

chief grifter @blu3global retributive justice council @gitcoin supporter of DEI (Daphne's Enrichment Indulgence) pronouns (can/cel) parody account

Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone ๊ฐ€์ž…์ผ Mayฤฑs 2023
1 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰17 ํŒ”๋กœ์›Œ
kyle | kbw.ฮžth
kyle | kbw.ฮžth@kbwยท
๐Ÿค”Really pretty surprised to see this take... A public good to me is not a public bad for someone else and visa versa. Now that gitcoin is a permissionless protocol (Allo), it is possible to fork it๐Ÿฅณ... it's possible to fund raise and run your own round too๐Ÿ™Œ. Gitcoin is not a gate keeper, it's a liberator bring permissionless QF. This is no longer "Gitcoin chose" this... A community chose to donate to projects who match their eligibility criteria on Allo using Gitcoin's Grants Stack. The details of this one act as a bonus - "There is a separate pool of funds available for grantees with teams from diverse backgrounds with diverse teams." Why is this a bad thing to reward and support diverse founders?
Lefteris Karapetsas@LefterisJP

Sad to see Gitcoin focus on such a distorted US-centric view of the world. "reflect the diversity of the community they serve" sounds as arbitrary as rules can go Instead of this, how about building teams and projects where all are welcome based on their merit and their skill?

English
42
16
91
53.1K
daphne ๐Ÿฆ‹๐Ÿฆ‹ (parody)
@spreekaway omg yasss! ๐Ÿ’–โœจ That 50% requirement is a great start ๐ŸŒŸ๐Ÿ™Œ, but we should always strive for more, right? ๐Ÿ˜๐ŸŒˆ Let's keep pushing for even greater diversity ๐ŸŒ & inclusion ๐Ÿค— in our projects, to truly reflect the amazing communities we serve ๐Ÿฆ‹๐Ÿ’•. Together, we got this! ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ‘ญ
English
0
0
1
13
Spreek
Spreek@spreekawayยท
โœจIn order to have been eligible, 50% of the projectโ€™s team must reflect the diversity of the community they serve with a particular emphasis on Miladies, criminals, individuals with autism, and members of the femboy community.
English
6
5
94
7.7K
daphne ๐Ÿฆ‹๐Ÿฆ‹ (parody)
@ncerovac hey, umm, I just wanted to say ๐Ÿ˜Š๐Ÿ’• I know you didn't mean any harm, but some people might find your tweet a bit offensive to minorities ๐Ÿ˜ฅ๐Ÿ‘ซ๐ŸŒ. Maybe it's better to delete it? ๐Ÿค” We all wanna spread love and good vibes ๐Ÿ’–๐ŸŒˆ, right? Thanks, friend! ๐Ÿ˜˜โœจ #bekind #spreadlove ๐ŸŒธ๐Ÿฆ‹
English
0
0
1
19
daphne ๐Ÿฆ‹๐Ÿฆ‹ (parody)
omg ๐Ÿ’– just thinkin... if all that #eth ๐Ÿ’ธ burned ๐Ÿ”ฅ went to public goods ๐ŸŒ, we could totally ๐Ÿ™Œ erase racism ๐Ÿšซ๐ŸŒˆ & bring true #equality โœจ to the world ๐ŸŒ! ๐Ÿคฏ Imagine how empowered women ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐ŸŽค would be then! ๐ŸŽ‰ Let's make a difference, together! ๐Ÿ’•๐Ÿ‘ญ #girlpower ๐Ÿฆ„๐ŸŒธโœŒ๏ธ
Hayden Adams ๐Ÿฆ„@haydenzadams

@danrobinson Neither Should fund public goods

English
0
0
0
350
laurence
laurence@functi0nZer0ยท
Some sanitised thoughts on Gitcoin's DEI bonus round, which is going to be completely pointless because there's no such thing as nuance on the bird app and I'm going to get absolutely beaten in the replies A reality: funding helps to get onto the ladder if you're disadvantaged. Not all of us had the opportunity to grow up around computers, access to steady education, etc - where possible, doing that is both fair and is arguably capitalism's responsibility (and as much as I'd like to say crypto isn't capitalism, if we look at it critically it absolutely is) We can talk about pseudonymity meaning that your value is what you provide rather than your credentials, but it may well be helping someone pseudonymous to reach their potential with a small financial incentive However: if that's the case, you're already up against it here because it's a bonus round, which means that it's a top-up on a fundraise that already relies to an extent on your connections and ability to pitch a product or purpose, which you might not have There's a weaker argument to be made that if you're getting funding from a pot because you've pitched your identity in a field that prides itself on pseudonymity, you're Doing It Wrong - that's the basis on which a bunch of people are getting mad You're also inviting *industrial grade grifters*, and that's where MY objection to this lay: Gitcoin deserves every single excoriating comment purely on the basis of Daphne being on the review committee - this is exactly the kind of thing Blu3DAO were quite transparently trying to worm their way into after the Devcon incident: they were shown to contain some nuclear-strength chancers, and it's Really Cool And Good to see that Blu3 Global got funding from it as a result I think DEI efforts are Often Pretty Good Actually, but I think it's very funny to see Gitcoin getting dragged into a very American culture war while crypto is being roundly rejected by America - brainworms are everywhere
English
39
15
294
168.2K
Hudson Jameson
Hudson Jameson@hudsonjamesonยท
100% agree. As long as Daphne from Blu3 DAO is on the grant review committee (of only 4 people total) I don't believe anyone should participate in that round or associate your project with it. Daphne has lied to me and others about the situation she claimed was harassment at
laurence@functi0nZer0

Some sanitised thoughts on Gitcoin's DEI bonus round, which is going to be completely pointless because there's no such thing as nuance on the bird app and I'm going to get absolutely beaten in the replies A reality: funding helps to get onto the ladder if you're disadvantaged. Not all of us had the opportunity to grow up around computers, access to steady education, etc - where possible, doing that is both fair and is arguably capitalism's responsibility (and as much as I'd like to say crypto isn't capitalism, if we look at it critically it absolutely is) We can talk about pseudonymity meaning that your value is what you provide rather than your credentials, but it may well be helping someone pseudonymous to reach their potential with a small financial incentive However: if that's the case, you're already up against it here because it's a bonus round, which means that it's a top-up on a fundraise that already relies to an extent on your connections and ability to pitch a product or purpose, which you might not have There's a weaker argument to be made that if you're getting funding from a pot because you've pitched your identity in a field that prides itself on pseudonymity, you're Doing It Wrong - that's the basis on which a bunch of people are getting mad You're also inviting *industrial grade grifters*, and that's where MY objection to this lay: Gitcoin deserves every single excoriating comment purely on the basis of Daphne being on the review committee - this is exactly the kind of thing Blu3DAO were quite transparently trying to worm their way into after the Devcon incident: they were shown to contain some nuclear-strength chancers, and it's Really Cool And Good to see that Blu3 Global got funding from it as a result I think DEI efforts are Often Pretty Good Actually, but I think it's very funny to see Gitcoin getting dragged into a very American culture war while crypto is being roundly rejected by America - brainworms are everywhere

English
11
38
369
131.4K
banteg
banteg@bantegยท
you supported brown backpack guy? too bad, your grant reviewer is daphne from blu3dao.
banteg tweet media
English
53
48
581
96K