deepak choudhary 리트윗함
deepak choudhary
74 posts


@PriyamvadaGopal @KanishkaNarayan Yes u grew up in pre hindutva India , but how come u have a Hindu name that too North Indian . India is a Hindu rashtra from 10000 years . Pls don't be confused
English

@KanishkaNarayan PS I grew up and studied in pre-Hindutva India. I won't be taking lectures in syncretism from anyone, ta.
English

Just to be clear, Holi is a very regionally specific North Indian festival. Celebrate it but don't make it about 'British Hindus', still less 'British Indians.'
Kanishka Narayan MP@KanishkaNarayan
Last night, the Speaker’s House was full of the light and colour of Holi! 🎨🌸 As a British Hindu MP, it was an honour to co-host the first-of-its-kind celebration, so generously hosted by Mr Speaker. A celebration of spring, of good over evil, and of the remarkable contribution of British Indians in every walk of British life.
English

@PriyamvadaGopal PRIYAMVADA GOPAL IS A PURELY SHUDDH 100 % NORTH INDIAN NAME . FOR ALL BRITISHERS ND OTHERS WHO ARE UNAWARE ..
English

@PriyamvadaGopal PRIYAMVADA UR NAME IS NORTH INDIA . ENTIRE NAME . OR IS IT REGIONAL OR IS IT INDIAN OR IS IT HINDU . I AS A NORTH INDIAN AM ALLOWING U TO USE OUR GIFT . FREE HAI MAM . JAI SHREE RAM
English

@AbhishBanerj Please send her to heaven so she can enjoy full benefits of Islam
English
deepak choudhary 리트윗함

Most people are living someone else's life. Not because they were forced to, but because they never stopped to ask whose voice was making their choices.
Martin Heidegger spent his entire life diagnosing this problem and building a way out.
Since Descartes in the 1600s, Western philosophy told us the same story: you are a mind, the world is "out there," and your job is to observe and control it from a safe distance.
Heidegger called this a catastrophic mistake.
He replaced the word "subject" with a single term - Dasein, meaning "being-there." You are not an inner self watching an external world through a window. You are already inside it, tangled in projects, relationships, and history you didn't fully choose.
The moment you accept that, everything changes.
Most of your choices aren't really yours.
Heidegger identified a force he called das Man, "the they." It's the invisible voice that whispers what success looks like, which paths are acceptable, and how a respectable life should be built. It doesn't announce itself. It sounds exactly like your own thinking.
He called the result fallenness: losing yourself so completely in anonymous social norms that you forget you were ever a self to begin with. The career chosen for its respectability. The opinions held because they're safe. The life built on an inherited script nobody handed you directly but everyone silently agreed to follow.
Most people never escape it because they never see it.
But two things can wake you up ↓
The first is what Heidegger called angst. Not fear. Fear always has an object, a threat you can name. Angst is the moment the world loses its familiar meaning and you find yourself face-to-face with your own raw existence. No role to hide behind. No script to follow.
Most people treat this as a problem to fix. Heidegger saw it as the only mood that wrenches you out of "the they" and forces a genuine confrontation with your own life.
Don't suppress it. Read it.
The second is death not as a distant event, but as a present structure shaping every choice you make. Heidegger called this being-towards-death. When you face your finitude honestly, the question stops being "what should I do?" It becomes: what actually deserves my finite time?
Heidegger published "Being and Time" in 1927 and permanently altered the course of philosophy.
But his most urgent insight was never academic.
You are already here. Already thrown into a life you didn't design. Already finite in ways you'd rather not think about.
The only question is whether you'll live like it, or keep waiting for someone else's permission.
—
Thanks for reading!
Enjoyed this post?
Follow @BigBrainPhiloso for more content like this.


English
deepak choudhary 리트윗함

@khanumarfa Shiv aroor didn't say that but ur prophet was actually a blood drinking beast . That's why the Jews give it back to u . Njoy .
English

The glee, the bloodlust, the ecstasy for violence- it’s chilling.
To casually fantasize about ‘erasing the whole Earth’ reveals more about your moral decay than any grasp of military or journalistic credibility.
Shiv Aroor@ShivAroor
I don’t wish for this at all, but literally the whole Earth can be erased by a squadron of B-2s, forget about 7,000-year-old civilisations.
English

Day 5 of @RoyalNavy F-35 still on ground at Thiruvananthapuram airport.
My show last night: youtu.be/BQMsZdKvCME?si…

YouTube

English
deepak choudhary 리트윗함

@Schandillia Is ghonchu ko sab kuch pata hai. Kaha se ikta gyaan ikatha Kiya re tu . Baua Patna me tumko patak patak ke kutenge
हिन्दी

QUICK PRIMER ON WHY FORDOW IS THE HOLY GRAIL
You need uranium to make nukes, but only U235, not U238. Naturally occurring uranium is scarce in U235, so it must be “enriched” to be useful. Different enrichment levels satisfy different needs. Nukes need ~90%, but anything above 60% (classified Highly Enriched Uranium or HEU) is proliferation-value and a major problem.
Enrichment is done by machines called centrifuges. The goal is to belt out as much high concentration U235 as possible, as quickly as possible. Iran has mainly 2 kinds, IR-1 and IR-6. In-betweens exist too, but they’re not as crucial. IR-6 yields 10x more than IR-1.
But one isn’t enough. So you have “cascades” of many—a cascade of IR-1 and a cascade of IR-6. Iran’s cascades are typically 174 centrifuges each, but numbers can vary a bit. Both IR-1 and IR-6 can produce HEU, but the latter can do it much quicker.
Since enrichment is such a crucial part of the whole nuclear process, countries typically have more than one, just in case. Iran has 2. One in Natanz and the other in Fordow.
Natanz has 2 facilities, an above-ground Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant or PFEP and an underground Fuel Enrichment Plant or FEP.
Fordow has only one, the underground Fordow Enrichment Plant or FFEP.
Natanz has more IR-6 than Fordow (10 vs. 6), but only 3 of Natanz are into HEU compared to all 6 at Fordow, which makes Fordow a more critical target than Natanz.
The good news about Natanz is that all 3 of its HEU cascades are above ground at PFEP. The Israeli strike yesterday is claimed to have significantly destroyed this bit. So there goes a big part of Khamenei’s mojo. But Fordow remains untouched. Buried at least 80 meters into a mountain, there’s no bunker buster on earth that can penetrate that far in.
Other than GBU-57, that is.
And there’s no aircraft on earth that can carry it while also maintaining stealth.
Other than a B2 Spirit (I mean, there is a Tupolev that can, but we all know what happened to those).
Israel has neither.
Even America does not have an unlimited supply of those. From publicly available data, they say, fewer than 20 GBU-57s (also called Massive Ordnance Penetrator or MOP) exist.
And THAT’S why Israel is so keen on involving America as quickly as possible in its campaign. Every passing day, Fordow is inching closer to enough weapons-grade material for a nuke.
By the way, Fordow isn’t a cakewalk even for the MOP. The FFEP sits close to 300 feet underground while a GBU-57 is known to top out at 200 feet.
But all hopes are not lost. If you can hit the exact same spot multiple times in a row, it’s theoretically possible to pierce through any thickness with even a low penetration munition. Israel could pull this off with 4-5 GBU-28 hits. GBU-28 is what it has and once used in Gaza to bust a tunnel network under the al-Aqsa Hospital.
Under normal circumstances, multiple hits at the same spot in hostile territory is unthinkable. But with the adversary’s AD decimated beyond repair, who knows what’s possible now?
Israel badly depends on America.
But not as badly as many are tempted to think.
For now, keep an eye on Fordow. An unearthly number of equations stand to change the day it’s hit.
English

@Schandillia Abe ghonchu Amit Chandaliya freearket market means trust not making a fool of people . DUCATI ND DIOR ARENOT LYING .. JYADA PADH LIYA HAI KYA TU . Chutiya Chaman. GHONCHU TERA BAAP MAKHANCHOR
Filipino

Why not? If Kishori can tote a Dior and Jaggi can ride a Ducati, why can’t others do the same? Free market offers everyone upward mobility. Including babas.
Roshan Rai@RoshanKrRaii
Desh ka Vikaas nahi hua apr is aadmi ka khoob ho gaya 🫡
English
deepak choudhary 리트윗함
deepak choudhary 리트윗함
deepak choudhary 리트윗함
deepak choudhary 리트윗함











