Alexander Furman

315 posts

Alexander Furman banner
Alexander Furman

Alexander Furman

@fav83com

Software engineer

Warsaw, Poland 가입일 Haziran 2024
257 팔로잉76 팔로워
Alexander Furman
Alexander Furman@fav83com·
@spion People are having a serious conversation about the tab-closing strategy. I love this app so much 😂
English
1
0
0
14
Alexander Furman
Alexander Furman@fav83com·
@arvidkahl Quite interesting that I recently made a skill that does the opposite. It goes through the whole test suite and looks for useless tests or tests that can be consolidated.
English
2
0
0
128
Arvid Kahl
Arvid Kahl@arvidkahl·
Okay this might be totally obvious but you can just tell Claude Code to double your test coverage and it will actually do it. Will need a lot of review, but if you’re just getting started with adding tests to your code, have the AI take a shot. Highest impact overnight task.
English
43
6
62
6.5K
Alexander Furman
Alexander Furman@fav83com·
This totally resonates with me. I can’t bring myself to use coderabbit or greptile consistently, even though I like how they handle reviews. The whole branch-push-PR workflow is slow and requires too many clicks. At the same time, it’s so easy to write a prompt or create a command or skill to get a decent code review instead.
dax@thdxr

i still don't get why we need to push code up to get an LLM review via awkward github ui hacks opencode has /review which can also do things like run your code to check things but a full time team focused on this would do it better, i just don't like the workflow they offer

English
0
0
0
24
Alexander Furman
Alexander Furman@fav83com·
I use Mac and Windows interchangeably every day. When I paste something into Claude’s TUI, I’m often convinced I’m pasting the right thing. But in reality, I frequently mix up Mac and Windows shortcuts (Cmd+C/Cmd+V and Ctrl+C/Ctrl+V). When you add prompt templates to the mix, it becomes difficult to spot the error.
English
0
0
0
69
Alexander Furman
Alexander Furman@fav83com·
@trq212 I use Claude for hours every single day, and I’m still probably only using 5% of what this article recommends. The paradox is that I still think I’m at the top of my Claude game.
English
0
0
0
303
Alexander Furman
Alexander Furman@fav83com·
I think @EnoReyes had a point when he spoke about the importance of automated validation. We will all be spending a lot of time this year thinking about it and working on every aspect of it. And if any technology we currently use does not easily allow for automated validation, it will soon fade away. youtube.com/watch?v=ShuJ_C…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
0
1
78
Alexander Furman
Alexander Furman@fav83com·
@curiouswavefn I’ve seen it only with opus, and in my case, it often happens right after I stop it mid-implementation and start yelling, “STOP!!! Why would you even do X? I’ve never asked for X!”. I take it as a sign that I failed to explain what I wanted clearly enough in the first place.
English
1
0
0
32
Ash Jogalekar
Ash Jogalekar@curiouswavefn·
Perhaps the most fascinating part of my LLM experience is when the model says "I am overthinking this". I then see it going back, rethinking and settling on the right strategy. Doesn't happen too often, but when it does it feels like a door that I thought was locked just opened.
English
2
0
18
1.6K
Dmytro Krasun
Dmytro Krasun@DmytroKrasun·
@yongfook To stop doomscrolling at all, try to reduce the refresh rate to 0Hz.
English
2
0
22
1K
Alexander Furman
Alexander Furman@fav83com·
@shopqit @0xSero I normally ask the $20 Codex plan to review PRs written by Claude. To be honest, I prefer that approach to coderabbit because it’s faster and more flexible.
English
0
0
0
39
Heritage American
Heritage American@shopqit·
One key thing: tell the ai to do 2 rounds of code review on whatever it just coded, it will find most of the bugs right away. Also use coderabbit tool. I made a custom script to do it locally and track what has been scanned using git hashes of the files, run by AI during the workflow.
English
1
0
1
31
0xSero
0xSero@0xSero·
"Take screenshots and videos of everything you've built, then review it." The amount of time this saves is wild, add onto it automated QA and you have yourself a semi-autonomous system. I was given this advice by Leo from Factory on my podcast. youtu.be/hP5kBYbM9hU?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
0xSero tweet media
English
12
9
261
12.6K
Alexander Furman
Alexander Furman@fav83com·
I hit the limits much faster when I have a task that Claude can naturally scale across multiple subagents (10 or more). For example, localizing a large, old codebase or manipulating the contents of a large database. I almost never hit the limits when I work on the new code (in my case it is usually C# and Typescript)
English
1
0
1
33
Marcin Krzyzanowski
Marcin Krzyzanowski@krzyzanowskim·
tension intensifies as I keep prompting something I would fix by hand in 10 minutes.
Marcin Krzyzanowski tweet media
English
5
0
11
1.6K
Marcin Krzyzanowski
Marcin Krzyzanowski@krzyzanowskim·
if you ask me, this thing is AGI. God give me strength, because I have no more patience
Marcin Krzyzanowski tweet media
English
2
0
25
6.1K
Alexander Furman
Alexander Furman@fav83com·
@GregorySchier Using Yaak after Postman is like a breath of fresh air. It would be incredibly sad if this product disappeared.
English
1
0
8
437
Greg Schier 👨🏼‍💻🇨🇦
Agentic coding will kill Yaak eventually. I saw the first proof of this today. I've been spinning on this thought for a while. I love the project but it's extremely demotivating to work on something you know is in a shrinking market.
Greg Schier 👨🏼‍💻🇨🇦 tweet media
English
18
1
49
9.5K
AK
AK@aiwithak·
@fav83com @GergelyOrosz Might be more of a phase than an era. Hard to imagine the problem not being solved by 2027
English
2
0
4
325
Gergely Orosz
Gergely Orosz@GergelyOrosz·
On one end, the Anthropic team is a massive user of AI to write code (80%+ of all code deployed is written by Claude Code). They ship amazingly fast. On the other hand, seeing these beyond terrible reliability numbers suggests there might be a downside to all this speed:
Gergely Orosz tweet media
English
307
268
4.9K
562.2K
GigaHiveDigital
GigaHiveDigital@GigaHiveDigital·
@fav83com @GergelyOrosz This is probably the next shift. We spent years ensuring PROD was “never broken”. Now it seems PROD issues are normailzed because Business and Product are fine with reliability issues as long as Eng can react with patches. Who knows where this goes….
English
2
0
2
294
Ben Sammons
Ben Sammons@BenSammons·
@fav83com @GergelyOrosz I think the 9’s are providing diminishing returns in comparison to shipping. Hate it but I think the math works out. Only core providers with tons of quality guardrails will keep any semblance of reliability.
English
1
0
1
223